Which is the black hole, the white hole, or the wormhole

It can't be described in a powerful way, they are conceptually different things, except for the plausible discovery of black holes now, the other 2 have not been discovered and demonstrated. Black holes are all-purpose absorbers. Therefore, matter including light is absorbed, the white hole is the universal releaser, everything is thrown into the universe in an instant, and the wormhole is a short road to three-dimensional space, and it is a near-convenient passage to three-dimensional space.

It's not awesome or not. The black hole seizes material energy, the white hole releases material energy, and the wormhole transfers information without changing the totality of material energy. Therefore, specific problems are analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

In addition, it is also divided into size, energy density and transfer capacity, as well as longevity and discoverability and usability prospects. In short, with the current technology, it is better not to meet these three, and it is strange that they are not finished.

Wormholes are awesome! --Wormhole is the concept of negative time on the timeline, through which it is possible to travel to the distant outer space with negligible time. Judging from the research of aliens, aliens choose the entrance of the wormhole to travel through a fixed route - the space-time gate channel.

That is, the time reversal gate. In nuclear physics research, it was found in the particle collider that particles have symmetry in time reversal, that is, time reversal all physical laws are true.

Black holes have been confirmed, white holes have not been confirmed, and wormhole research has just been confirmed, and they are not powerful

I can't say it's amazing, but if I want to say it's convenient, it should be a wormhole.

Difference Between Wormhole and Black Hole:

1. The concept is different: a wormhole is a narrow tunnel that may exist in the universe connecting two different time and space. A black hole is a type of celestial body in the universe in modern general relativity. One is a tunnel and the other is a celestial body, two things that are completely different from each other.

2. Different properties: wormholes are described in the theory of relativity and are used as high-speed trains in the universe. The existence of wormholes depends on a strange nature and matter, and this strange nature is negative energy.

These are the two properties of wormholes. Black holes, however, hardly maintain any of the complex properties of the matter from which they were formed. All it retains is mass, angular momentum, and charge, and simplification is perhaps the most basic feature of a black hole.

In general, the ** of black holes, usually, forms a black hole by folding in a larger star, which astronomers say "super-Singapore**".

Failed supernovae, not all stars can successfully turn into black holes, like the red supergiants in the universe, and as they slowly rotate, the core ** could not escape the formation of the black hole, but disappeared.

The safe distance of a black hole, the place beyond the horizon is absolutely safe, as long as it is not in the vision of the black hole, the matter in the universe can be safe.

Summary. Pro, wormholes and black holes are both very mysterious and interesting celestial phenomena in the universe, but their properties and effects are different. A wormhole is a theoretical physical phenomenon, a kind of passage that connects two different space-times.

According to the existing theory, wormholes can be used to achieve faster-than-light travel or travel through time, but there is no evidence of their existence yet, so wormholes are still hypothetical. A black hole is a celestial phenomenon that has been proven to exist, and it is an extremely dense and gravitational object. Due to their extreme density, black holes can attract and engulf the matter around them, and not even light can escape the black hole's gravitational range.

As a result, black holes are the most powerful gravitational bodies in the universe and are capable of exerting great influence on surrounding galaxies and celestial bodies. In general, wormholes and black holes are wonderful phenomena in the universe, but the actual existence of black holes and their strong gravitational effect make them more mysterious and powerful than wormholes

<> which is more powerful, wormholes or black holes.

Hello dear, according to your question, I will now answer for you: black holes are more powerful than wormholes <> dear, wormholes and black holes are both very mysterious and interesting celestial phenomena in the universe, but their properties and effects are different. A wormhole is a theoretical physical phenomenon, a kind of passage that connects two different space-times.

According to the existing theory, wormholes can be used to achieve faster-than-light travel or travel through time, but there is no evidence of their existence, so wormholes are still hypothetical. A black hole is a celestial phenomenon that has been proven to exist, and it is an extremely dense and gravitational object. Due to their extreme density, black holes can attract and engulf the matter around them, and not even light can escape the black hole's gravitational range.

As a result, black holes are the most slow-shadowing and powerful gravitational bodies in the universe, capable of exerting galaxies and celestial bodies around them. In general, wormholes and black holes are wonderful phenomena in the universe, but the actual existence of black holes and their strong gravitational effect make them more mysterious and powerful than wormholes

Each black hole corresponds to a white hole, and the two are indispensable, closely related, complementary, transformative, and opposite, so it is impossible to compare who is more powerful.

Now, white holes are just mathematical derivations of some physicists, astronomy is the science of observation, if the universe always conforms to the symmetry of particle physics, assuming that there is a super white hole at the bottom of a super-large black hole, why haven't we observed the existence of a white hole until now? Or find any evidence of the existence of white holes, which is why many astrophysicists do not agree that white holes exist.

The white hole is raised by the process.

The white hole is actually the inversion of the black hole, and there is a channel of more than three dimensions between the black hole and the white hole, which enters from the black hole and comes out of the white hole, because these substances have a great velocity when they are sucked in from the black hole, so they also have a great velocity when they erupt from the white hole, but their velocities are generally equal.

As the ultimate development of things, black holes will inevitably lead to another end, which is white holes. In fact, in the theory of the expansive explosion cosmology, the singularity of the primordial fireball has long been encountered, and this problem has been bothering scientists. The maximum mass of this singularity is similar to the singularity of density and black holes, but the mechanism of their activity is quite the opposite.

There is no one more powerful celestial body in the universe, and white holes are only possible.

The power of black holes and white holes is actually incomparable, because there is no one more powerful celestial body, and the existence of white holes has not been scientifically confirmed. Black holes and white holes are two opposing concepts, black holes are absorbing matter, while white holes are emitting matter. And the white hole usually does not exist alone in empty space, it is mostly inside some radiation**.

Many scientists and physicists say that white holes and black holes are linked, and that black holes are inverted to be white holes, and their interpretation is based on Einstein's summary of the "mirror universe".

Physicist Stephen Hawking also said that turning a black hole upside down is a white hole, explaining that when a white hole and a black hole reach thermal equilibrium with their surroundings, the white hole and the black hole will absorb and emit the same amount of radiation, so the white hole and the black hole are interrelated.

Physicists at the University of Oregon in Oregon say that white holes are supposed to exist in the universe. He said that black holes will slowly disappear over time, and in the process of disappearing, they will release matter in the form of "Hawking radiation", but white holes will not absorb or release any matter when they disappear. More evidence is needed to prove whether white holes exist in the universe.