Who is more reliable, Buddhism or quantitology? Think of a person he will know?

The macrocosm is not the same as the microcosm. At present, the means of science and technology are not enough, and the two cannot be more closely linked.

Buddhism is the supreme school in the world, the Buddha has five eyes and six paths, and his heart is one of them, that is, he has his heart, that is, every sentient being knows and understands what he thinks and thinks.

The only common agreement between quantum science and Buddhism is that it can be studied as a science.

There is little consensus on the rest. Buddhism was known 3,000 years ago, and quantum science, as a new science, has not yet been fully understood by the general public.

Buddhism is the law of cause and effect, and its truth is the law of cause and effect. It is about great compassion and great compassion to help the suffering. Quantum science doesn't seem to have that.

No, quantum science is science, Buddhism is religion, one materialism and the other idealism, the theoretical basis between them is different, sometimes there may be an intersection, but it cannot be a system of truth.

November 8 "China Social Science News".

With the theme of "Cultivating High-quality Talents for Sustainable Development for BAI", the B03 special edition comprehensively introduces the achievements of the School of Humanities and Social Sciences in the past ten years from the aspects of ten-year history, DAO discipline construction and scientific research work, teaching work, and student work.

It is reported that "China Social Science Daily" is sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, published by the China Social Science Magazine, which is the frontier of national philosophy and social sciences, and is a large-scale theoretical and academic newspaper for the national theoretical and academic circles.

The author of this article is really a god, it's awesome. Explains the twin feints that I had been wondering about before.

Those who can figure out this topic are all gods.

Admit that there is. There are a lot of bodhisattva stories in this life. This mainly refers to Shakyamuni. There is also Maitreya Bodhisattva, who should come to become a Buddha. This is a common acknowledgement of the great and small vehicles. Only with bodhisattva behavior can we achieve Buddhahood, which is also recognized by both Mahayana and Hinayana.

There is a bodhisattva who says, but it is not focused, the bodhisattva can bless you here, bless you that...

There are ten bodhisattvas according to the level of practice:

Those who have attained enlightenment (i.e., enlightenment) are called arhats.

The bodhisattvas of the two places are generally called: Yuanjue Buddha.

From the first land to the glowing land, the flame land (six lands) is a stage.

Starting from the Bodhisattvas of the Seven Lands, they are all non-abdicating Bodhisattvas.

The Bodhisattvas of the Ten Lands are basically the same as the Buddhas. This depends on the bodhisattva's vow in the cause and place, whether he first becomes a Buddha for all beings, or whether he becomes a Buddha at the same time as all sentient beings, or whether he does not become a Buddha in hell like the Bodhisattva of Jizo. So when it comes to cause and effect, it's the same with becoming a Buddha.

Are there any bodhisattvas in the Hinayana scriptures?

An arhat is a bodhisattva who has attained the primordial land.