For the phenomenon of a small number of students not being disciplined, we can t ignore it and chang

Changed to a rhetorical question.

For: How can we ignore the undisciplined phenomenon of a small number of students?

The method of changing a declarative sentence to a rhetorical question

1. Formula 1: Change the affirmative words in the affirmative sentence (yes, can, will, have, like, should) to negative words (no, can't, won't, no, don't, don't, shouldn't).

2. Formula 2: Change the negative words in the negative sentence (not, can't, won't, no, not like, shouldn't) to affirmative words (yes, can, will, have, like, should).

3. Formula 3: Add rhetorical modal words such as "how, how, wouldn't, how" in front of affirmative or negative words.

4. Formula 4: Add the interrogative particle "what, what" at the end of the sentence, etc., and change the full stop at the end of the sentence to a question mark.

5. Mantra five: Naturally, there can be no problems behind.

The first thing to do is to add a rhetorical question....Is it? How....This? At the same time, the meaning of the sentence cannot be changed, so can we ignore the phenomenon of a small number of students not following discipline?

If this is an affirmative sentence and is changed to a rhetorical question, then it should be said that the phenomenon of a small number of students not observing discipline can we ignore it?

Can we turn a blind eye to the indiscipline of a small number of students? 2.Can't we turn a blind eye to the indiscipline of a small number of students? 3.How can we turn a blind eye to the indiscipline of a small number of students?

Can we ignore the undisciplined behavior of a small number of students? The changed sentence is consistent with the original sentence, but the rhetorical question has a strong tone and expresses stronger feelings than the declarative sentence.

Can we ignore the undisciplined behavior of a small number of students?

Original sentence: We must severely punish the phenomenon of violating law and discipline.

The sentence should be changed toRhetorical questionWhy: Don't we severely punish the phenomenon of violating law and discipline?

The method of changing the rhetorical question: change the affirmative word "must" in the original sentence to the negative word "do not be careful", then add the rhetorical question "is it" at the beginning of the sentence, add the interrogative particle "?" at the end of the sentence, and change the full stop at the end of the sentence to a question mark.

Features of rhetorical questions:1. Usually rhetorical questions are declarative sentences.

The revision is to emphasize the tone.

2. Some rhetorical questions should also have rhetorical questions, such as: is it, how, so ......In addition to rhetorical questions, add modal words at the end.

Such as: Well, ......And in order to show the difference from the declarative sentence, a question mark should be added after the middle of the sentence.

3. And usually the sentence (judgment sentence.

After the meaning is reversed, a rhetorical question is added.

Changed to a declarative sentence:

We are students and we are subject to school discipline.

We are students and follow the school rules.

Changed to a rhetorical question.

How can we do something that violates the rules of the school?

Can we do something that violates the rules of the school?

We are students, how can we not follow the discipline of the school?

Change the affirmative words (yes, can, would, etc.) in the affirmative sentence to negative words (not, can't, won't, etc.), or change the negative words in the negative sentence (no, can't, won't, etc.) to affirmative words (yes, can, would, etc.), add rhetorical modal words such as "how, how, wouldn't, wouldn't" in front of the affirmative or negative words, add the interrogative particle "what, what" at the end of the sentence, etc., and change the full stop at the end of the sentence to a question mark.