A philosophical explanation of good and evil in the heart and tongue?

The philosophical idea to explain things has two sides, which can be explained by the interaction between the heart and the tongue, good and evil, and the idea of mutual opposition and mutual support between them, the tongue and the heart are the two organs of the human body.

The philosophical explanation of good and evil in the heart and tongue is that the heart and tongue are both organs of our human body, which are mutually influencing and interconnected, and restricting each other, and perhaps what we think in our hearts is spoken through our mouths.

The philosophical interpretation of good and evil in the Shinkawa tongue is certainly not the same, because the heart and tongue express a person's thoughts and communication, while good and evil express the person's character.

It should be explained by the philosophical explanation that the tongue is good and evil, and the balance on the tongue is so small, these explanations are that the heart is good and the tongue is sharper.

In fact, there is no difference between good and evil in the heart and tongue, but it is the action of the brain that causes them to produce thinking activities and make them react in this regard.

The philosophical explanation of the heart and tongue is good and evil, but in fact, the words of the tongue are only one of his expressions.

How do you say the philosophy of good and evil in the tongue? A person with a good heart should also say it with his tongue, which should be better, and good and evil are also opposites.

I think March 2 is actually borderless, it's a very simple thing.

New and verbal good and bad facts. Show, or the heart and mouth do not go the same way. What he said in his heart was very good, and he was a real person in his heart, he didn't think so.

This tongue is good and evil, of course, it can be interpreted philosophically, because what you say can be regarded as a philosophical explanation.

Hello, what this friend means by this sentence is that people should do good deeds no matter what, do you have any other questions? Have a great day.

A philosophical explanation of the heart and tongue for good and evil. What does that mean? Philosophical explanations, you look them up on the Internet.

The original meaning of goodness is "auspicious", and the adjectives are used with meanings such as "intact, common satisfaction, auspiciousness, beauty, kindness, charity, promise, leadership, prudence, wisdom, familiarity", and verbs are used with meanings such as "good at, cultivation, envy, think good, praise, and friendliness".

It is used as a noun with the meaning of "good person", and it is also used as a surname. And "well; Many; Often; easy" and other meanings. In short, the concept of "goodness" needs to be experienced in terms of altruism, from which all meanings are derived. It has profound ethical, philosophical and Buddhist connotations.

evil is a Chinese word with a variety of pronunciations, each with different meanings. Such as è, which means bad, bad. Such as wù, which means to hate, and hatred, such as ě, which means the feeling of wanting to vomit, such as wū, is a literary interjection that means surprise.

Goodness, from the sheep from the word. Original meaning: to speak like a sheep. Talking like a sheep will prevent quarrels and fights, and there will be further possibilities for cooperation.

The sheep is the mascot of China, and the right side of the auspicious character is the sheep. In addition, beauty and righteousness are related to sheep. The biggest feature of sheep is that their horns are bent inward, and they will not kill each other when they fight. In addition, the sheep are docile. So, the sheep is a symbol of cooperation.

The sheep gas is out for the rice (the cow gas is out for the mu). The sheep takes its meaning of "everyone"; His words are the anger of everyone and the goodness.

The original meaning of "auspicious" is used as an adjective with the meaning of "intact, common satisfaction, auspiciousness, beauty, kindness, charity, promise, leadership, prudence, wisdom, familiarity", etc., and the verb is used with the meaning of "good at it, repair, envy, think good, praised, friendly", and the noun is used with the meaning of "good person", and it is also used as a surname.

And "well; Many; Often; easy" and other meanings. In short, the concept of "goodness" needs to be experienced in terms of altruism, from which all meanings are derived. It has profound ethical, philosophical and Buddhist connotations.

Traditional Chinese ethics has a wealth of persuasion content, such as "Taishang Induction Chapter" and so on. "Good surname" is a rare surname. The poem "My Thoughts of the Holy Sages" says:

If you think deeply, you will have a wonderful idea. Believe in teachers and practice teachers, and you can be famous teachers. Sacred learning is erudite, and it becomes a peerless study.

Knowing the good and doing the good is for the sake of the good. Don't be evil in nature, don't give up in form. Don't stop, don't break God.

evil is a Chinese word with a variety of pronunciations, each with different meanings. Such as è, which means bad, bad. Such as wù, which means to hate, and hatred, such as ě, which means the feeling of wanting to vomit, such as wū, is a literary interjection that means surprise.

Good and evil are like a scale with a mark in the middle, and that mark is the standard of your own heart. The mark is engraved in **, and you may not know it yourself.

Answer hello, the meaning of good is "auspicious", and the adjectives are used with the meaning of "intact, common satisfaction, auspiciousness, beauty, kindness, charity, promise, prudence, wisdom, familiarity", etc., and the verb is used with the meaning of "good at, cultivated, envied, thought good, praised, friendly", and used as a noun with the meaning of "good person", and also made a surname. And "well; Many; Often; easy" and other meanings. "Goodness" has profound ethical, philosophical, and Buddhist connotations.

evil is a Chinese word that means bad and bad.

According to the meaning of the fifth volume of the Theory of Enlightenment, it is good to be able to benefit the flaws and omissions of this life and other lives; On the other hand, in this life and in other lives, there is a violation of the law, and there is a leak in the law, which is evil. The distinction between good and evil is the difference between good and bad. And both good and evil must run through this life and other lives, otherwise it is unremembered.

For example, the happiness of man and heaven is beneficial in this life, but not in other worlds, so it is not good, but has no memory. And like the bitter fruit of evil pleasures, although it is a violation in this life, it is not a violation in other lives, so it is not evil, but has no memory.

Selflessness for others is goodness

Based on your ID, I think you tend to pick kindness. I don't agree that human nature is inherently evil, imagine that a person is born without understanding anything, how can it be evil? Evil is a later social influence. What evil thoughts can a 2 or 3 year old have?

You say that people become bad when they are not restrained, and I think you have come to this conclusion because your mind is still stuck in the present era.

If we believe in Marx's communism, then people's ideological quality is extremely high, there is no oppression, people are free, but people's lives will be much happier than they are now.

If it's not radicalized, how do you know that thing is evil?

Let's try to cherish some things that are true, good, and beautiful, because we have lost a lot in this regard, and we have lost even more. There are fewer people who come in, and many people who go out, and it will be terrible to face a kind of emptiness in life. If the true thought of our hearts is to seek good and avoid evil, then for the sake of such a meaningful pursuit, it is better to be bitter, at least in the dead of night my conscience can send a voice of encouragement and comfort to me, and I can bow down in the midst of troubled and complicated circumstances.

Choosing kindness will be very hard, and it is not right to lose one's life and affect others.

There are only two things in the world, one is man-made and the other is natural. Naturally occurring is certainly bad: tsunamis, droughts, floods, epidemics, etc.

Everything except natural occurrence is man-made. Is what happens man-made good or bad?

From the perspective of behavior, no matter what the purpose of man-made happens, it is to damage the environment and to be bad; From the point of view of survival, you can't survive without destroying the environment, so destroying the environment is necessary and a good thing. So both good and evil people destroy the environment, and good and evil cannot be judged by deeds, but only by purpose and psychology.

As I said earlier, destroying the environment is for the survival of human beings, so those who destroy the environment for the sake of human survival are good, and those who destroy the environment for personal gain are evil. But good and evil are both active in the heart, and you can't judge without revealing them, so you still judge them according to their actions, and judge them according to the degree of destruction. It is evil to destroy the environment, and it is evil not to develop if the environment is not destroyed, so good is between the highest score and the lowest score.

According to the principle of simple harmonic vibration in physics, the minimum speed of the left and right ends of the spring is zero, the larger it is to the middle, and the largest position in the middle, so the wisdom is zero when the environment is destroyed and the environment is not destroyed, and the wisdom is in the intermediate stage. Therefore, the momentum that drives the development of human society lies in the rational development of resources in the intermediate stage, not in the destruction of the environment and the isolation of the country. Therefore wisdom is proportional to good, and ignorance is proportional to evil.

The wiser the better, and the more ignorant the better. The closer you are to the middle, the greater the wisdom; The closer to the two ends, the weaker the wisdom, so the greater the proportion of wise people in any country, the closer to the middle, the more developed.

Philosophically speaking, yin and yang are half each, so the good and the evil are half each. But it is based on the world, not the country, and the more good people are born in this country, the more evil people are born in that country. It's like your family gave birth to 4 boys, then there must be a family that gave birth to 4 girls, and it is definitely not your two boys and two girls, and his family has two boys and two girls, no.

Therefore, developed and rich countries may have more good people born, and poor and backward countries may have more evil people.

We'll talk about that later.

Good and evil fall under the category of morality and are not strictly defined. What is good to you may be evil to others; What is good here and now, then and then can be evil. Wang Yangming.

Mr. Mind has the best explanation for this: "There is no goodness and no disgust, and there is good and malicious action." Knowing good and knowing evil is conscience, and doing evil for good is a thing.

Therefore, how to distinguish between good and evil, the only way to go is to "Gewu", but what exactly is "Gewu" and how to "Gewu", so far no one has given a convincing explanation.

The definition and distinction between good and evil is an important topic in ethics and sociology. Here are some common criteria for defining and distinguishing good from evil:

1.Moral standards: Moral norms are the norms of behavior in society, which usually include legal, religious, ethical, and other regulations. Based on these moral standards, one can judge whether an action is good or evil.

2.Consequentialism: distinguishing between good and evil according to the consequences of actions, that is, if an action brings positive consequences, such as promoting social progress and improving human well-being, then it is good; On the other hand, if it brings negative consequences, such as harming others, destroying the environment, etc., then it is evil.

3.Motivation Theory: The motivation of behavior is also an important criterion for distinguishing good from evil. An action is good if it is done with good intentions, for the benefit of others, or for the good of society; If it is motivated by selfishness, greed, or malice, then it is evil.

4.Social Identity Theory: Social identity is also an important criterion for distinguishing good from evil. If an action is recognized and supported by society, then it is good; If it is condemned and criticized by society, then it is evil.

In addition to this, there are other criteria for distinguishing good from evil, such as personal beliefs, cultural traditions, etc. In general, the definition and distinction between good and evil is a complex and pluralistic issue, which needs to be judged from different perspectives and standards.

The core of good and evil is nothing more than profit. And this interest can be divided into three levels.

The first is the human being's time of existence. Doing: The more we can prolong the existence of human beings, the better; The shorter the human being, the more evil it becomes.

The second is the world (including things and outsiders). Doing: The more beneficial to the world, the better; The more harmful it is to the world, the more evil it is.

Finally, there is the ego. What you do: the more beneficial you are, the better you are; The more harmful it is to oneself, the more evil it becomes.

Of course, the above is about good and evil, but the heart of good and evil is different.

If evil deeds are done with good intentions (i.e., evil deeds with good intentions), then things are evil and hearts are good; If one does a good deed out of malice (such as seeking something in return), then the deed is good and the heart is evil.

In addition, good and evil also involve personal abilities: the more you try to do good, or try to reduce evil, the better your heart will be; The more recklessly we do evil, or the more we intend to do good, the more evil our hearts become.

First of all, I personally think that human nature is inherently good or human nature is inherently evil or inherently non-existent, which is a topic of endless debate. Let's not talk about what human nature is like, let's talk about what good and evil are, what is good and what is evil. Luo Li, such as:

It is good to be anxious about what people are anxious about, to be considerate of others, to be kind to others, to be polite and to help others, and so on. Evil is to harm the body or interests of others, deceive, steal, be untrustworthy, pursue one's own interests regardless of methods and consequences, speak ill of others, make others difficult to hurt, and so on.

Second: because human beings are social animals, everyone must divide labor and cooperate to live better with each other, which is an inevitable premise, so everyone wants to participate in this group, so everyone will naturally accept some basic rules for everyone to cooperate well, and abiding by these rules is good, so goodness is inevitable and respected by everyone. If everyone is oriented towards good, why is there still evil?!

Because everyone needs to distribute the fruits of cooperation, in the process of distribution, because of the different information, resources and status of each person, there is an injustice in the distribution process, some people want too much desire to encroach on the fruits of other people's labor, or because of insufficient understanding of others do not know others, for various reasons, so that the distribution of society is unfair.