How is good and evil defined and distinguished? Definition of good and evil

Updated on society 2024-07-01
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Good and evil fall under the category of morality and are not strictly defined. What is good to you may be evil to others; What is good here and now, then and then can be evil. Wang Yangming.

    Mr. Mind has the best explanation for this: "There is no goodness and no disgust, and there is good and malicious action." Knowing good and knowing evil is conscience, and doing evil for good is a thing.

    Therefore, how to distinguish between good and evil, the only way to go is to "Gewu", but what exactly is "Gewu" and how to "Gewu", so far no one has given a convincing explanation.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The definition and distinction between good and evil is an important topic in ethics and sociology. Here are some common criteria for defining and distinguishing good from evil:

    1.Moral standards: Moral norms are the norms of behavior in society, which usually include legal, religious, ethical, and other regulations. Based on these moral standards, one can judge whether an action is good or evil.

    2.Consequentialism: distinguishing between good and evil according to the consequences of actions, that is, if an action brings positive consequences, such as promoting social progress and improving human well-being, then it is good; On the other hand, if it brings negative consequences, such as harming others, destroying the environment, etc., then it is evil.

    3.Motivation Theory: The motivation of behavior is also an important criterion for distinguishing good from evil. An action is good if it is done with good intentions, for the benefit of others, or for the good of society; If it is motivated by selfishness, greed, or malice, then it is evil.

    4.Social Identity Theory: Social identity is also an important criterion for distinguishing good from evil. If an action is recognized and supported by society, then it is good; If it is condemned and criticized by society, then it is evil.

    In addition to this, there are other criteria for distinguishing good from evil, such as personal beliefs, cultural traditions, etc. In general, the definition and distinction between good and evil is a complex and pluralistic issue, which needs to be judged from different perspectives and standards.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The core of good and evil is nothing more than profit. And this interest can be divided into three levels.

    The first is the human being's time of existence. Doing: The more we can prolong the existence of human beings, the better; The shorter the human being, the more evil it becomes.

    The second is the world (including things and outsiders). Doing: The more beneficial to the world, the better; The more harmful it is to the world, the more evil it is.

    Finally, there is the ego. What you do: the more beneficial you are, the better you are; The more harmful it is to oneself, the more evil it becomes.

    Of course, the above is about good and evil, but the heart of good and evil is different.

    If evil deeds are done with good intentions (i.e., evil deeds with good intentions), then things are evil and hearts are good; If one does a good deed out of malice (such as seeking something in return), then the deed is good and the heart is evil.

    In addition, good and evil also involve personal abilities: the more you try to do good, or try to reduce evil, the better your heart will be; The more recklessly we do evil, or the more we intend to do good, the more evil our hearts become.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    First of all, I personally think that human nature is inherently good or human nature is inherently evil or inherently non-existent, which is a topic of endless debate. Let's not talk about what human nature is like, let's talk about what good and evil are, what is good and what is evil. Luo Li, such as:

    It is good to be anxious about what people are anxious about, to be considerate of others, to be kind to others, to be polite and to help others, and so on. Evil is to harm the body or interests of others, deceive, steal, be untrustworthy, pursue one's own interests regardless of methods and consequences, speak ill of others, make others difficult to hurt, and so on.

    Second: because human beings are social animals, everyone must divide labor and cooperate to live better with each other, which is an inevitable premise, so everyone wants to participate in this group, so everyone will naturally accept some basic rules for everyone to cooperate well, and abiding by these rules is good, so goodness is inevitable and respected by everyone. If everyone is oriented towards good, why is there still evil?!

    Because everyone needs to distribute the fruits of cooperation, in the process of distribution, because of the different information, resources and status of each person, there is an injustice in the distribution process, some people want too much desire to encroach on the fruits of other people's labor, or because of insufficient understanding of others do not know others, for various reasons, so that the distribution of society is unfair.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Good, will mean the word, from the sheep from the word. Original meaning: to speak like a sheep. Talking like a sheep will prevent quarrels and fights, and there will be further possibilities for cooperation.

    The meaning of good is "auspicious", and the adjectives are used with the meaning of "intact, common satisfaction, auspiciousness, beauty, kindness, charity, promise, prudence, wisdom, and familiarity", and the verbs are used with the meanings of "good at it, repair, envy, think good, praised, friendly", and the meaning of "good person" is used to make slippery nouns, and it is also used as a surname. And "well; Many; Often; easy" and other meanings. "Goodness" has profound ethical, philosophical, and Buddhist connotations.

    evil is a Chinese word that means bad and bad.

    According to the meaning of the fifth volume of the Theory of Enlightenment, it can benefit the omissions of this world and other worlds, and the practice of the Dharma without omissions is good; On the other hand, in this life and in other lives, there is a violation of the law, and there is a leak in the law, which is evil. The distinction between good and evil is the difference between good and bad. And both good and evil must run through this life and other lives, otherwise it is unremembered.

    For example, the happiness of man and heaven is beneficial in this life, but not in other worlds, so it is not good, but has no memory. For example, the bitter fruit of staring at the evil taste of the state, although it is a violation in this life, it is not a violation in other lives, so it is not evil, but has no memory.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The criterion for evaluating good and evil actions is the effect. (1) Good and evil are in the realm of morality, not in terms of legal standards. The so-called "goodness" is the beneficial behavior to others and society that is manifested in the relationship between people and people; "Evil" is an act that is harmful to others and society.

    It can be seen from the quotation that the "beneficial" and "harmful" mentioned in the article are undoubtedly judged by the effect of the behavior. Whereas, "motivation" is a subjective state with implicit characteristics, and motivation always needs to be expressed through behavior. It can be seen that motivation alone cannot evaluate behavior at all.

    (2) From the perspective of behavior management, the same motive can cause a variety of different behaviors. For example, when trying to get a video camera, this motivation can lead to the following behaviors:

    First, work hard, get more wages, and save money to buy; Second, save money to buy money. It can be seen that both of these actions can be said to be good in terms of reason and reason; However, if you want to rely on crooked ways and use ill-gotten gains to buy, this kind of behavior is undoubtedly evil. Both good and evil behaviors are caused by the same motive, and if the effect is not produced by the behavior, how can the good or evil of the behavior be evaluated by relying on the motive alone?

    (3) Reasonable motives may also lead to unreasonable or even wrong behavior. For example: parents "stick education" children, from the parents' motivation, is undoubtedly to let the child become a talent, is a good motive, is a good motive I think the standard for evaluating the good and evil of behavior is the summary of the moral outlook that the public generally agrees to accept, that is, the current law, that is, the landlord said, the effect, you can find that the ruling and sentencing of the law are based on the consequences caused by the behavior, and can only be judged by the consequences.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There is equality between 'good' and 'evil'....The criterion for distinguishing 'good' from 'evil': whether there is an equal heart! You may say that people are divided into good and evil, wise and foolish, and intimate and alienated, so how can everything be equal?

    A good person does not necessarily always be good, he will also do evil; And the wicked do not necessarily do evil forever, but he will also do good. So, there is equality between good and evil. True goodness is cultivating an egalitarian heart.

    If hearts are equal, the world will be harmonious and peaceful. Treat the world with an equal heart and live a life without likes and dislikes, and the world is heaven.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The high place is morality, the bottom line is law, and I think it is the system.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Whether there is love or not, whether it is selfishness or not.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    No one is perfect, and we cannot use one-sided words to determine whether a person is good or evil, good or bad. We can't essentially distinguish between good and bad in a person. Good and evil are embodied in the little details of life.

Related questions
30 answers2024-07-01

In this world, everyone has a face! That's innate, and you can't change it! (Note: Except for facelifts). >>>More

3 answers2024-07-01

The Farmer and the Snake A farmer saw a snake frozen in the cold winter and felt pitiful for it, so he picked it up, carefully carried it into his arms, and warmed it with his warm body. The snake was warmed, and gradually recovered, and came back to life. When it fully regained consciousness, it immediately regained its true nature, and bit the benefactor with its sharp fangs, causing him to suffer a fatal wound. >>>More

11 answers2024-07-01

Neither good nor evil, neither good nor evil. Profit is the key It is human nature to maximize the pursuit of one's own interests. Interests can be divided into material and spiritual, and most of the good side is spiritual. >>>More

3 answers2024-07-01

Good and evil are the perfect state of harmony of things; The good is to be fully integrated, and the evil is to be fully integrated. Good and evil are relative dualities, and they are fat objects to be coupled. Good and evil are the state of things, that is, they have to do with facts, not with positions. >>>More

15 answers2024-07-01

In philosophy, there is the principle of unity of opposites (contradictions), everything in the world is contradictory, up and down, high and low, rich and poor, more and less, etc. are two sides of contradictions, these two aspects are mutually opposed and mutually exclusive, but they are interdependent, mutually unified, and transformed into each other under certain conditions, which means that the two sides of any opposition contradiction are inseparable from whom, just like God wants to destroy the devil, but one day the devil disappears, and God has no need to exist.