After the verdict of Xu Ting s case was announced, did the bank recover the money?

recovered and fined another 20,000 yuan.

Before the bank sued Xu Ting, the loss had already been compensated by the ATM provider!

It should be innocent After all, the banking side is the main problem, and Xu Ting will just be morally condemned to be a new person and believe that he will live a better life.

Return unjust enrichment and acquittal.

It's a crime. However, China lacks a similar law. How many years in prison depends on luck.

Because China is a legal law, that is, all judgments must be based on laws and regulations, and if there are no provisions, it will be far-fetched. (e.g. Xu Ting's case). And the enactment of laws must lag behind actual needs.

In China's actual situation, the legal quality of citizens determines that this kind of legal system can only be used, and countries such as the United States have a law on judges, although there are no clear provisions in the law, judges can create their own laws according to the actual situation as the basis for the future.

It is a crime in the first place, and the repayment of money and interest can only be punished lightly, but it will definitely violate the law and will definitely go to jail. This is a crime of theft, if you can pay back the money, it will be fine, then is it still called the law, then I will steal hundreds of thousands, and then go to business to return the money, and then do not break the law, that is not all Chinese to steal, is not hehe.

must have violated the law, imagine Xu Ting's fate.

As long as you take it, you will be in the law, although it is not your fault, this is what society is like now

In China, this is illegal.

Breaking the law and imagining the fate of Xu Ting.

There was nothing wrong with convicting Xu Ting of theft, because he was stealing in the first place.

What is Stealing? It's the mistake of taking someone else's stuff for yourself. Xu Ting had 170 yuan in his card, and he actually entered 1,000 yuan, which shows that Xu Ting was wrong, because he should not have entered more than 170 yuan.

If the first time was an accident, then the subsequent many times were clearly malicious.

Some people use the example of the United Kingdom, but the example of the United Kingdom is to pick up money, not steal it. For example, there is 170 in the card, and people enter 100, deduct 100, and spit out 200, and the extra 100 is picked up, because the withdrawer is not at fault.

They are all greedy for small and cheap and suffer big losses.

This is a problem in the existing system, banks are responsible for poor supervision, but it is the person who commits the act, not the bank, who violates the criminal law, and the law only regulates the behavior of people.