Dialectics, materialism, metaphysics, distinctions

Dialectics requires people to look at problems from the point of view of the development of movement connections. For example, when analyzing the reason why Li Hua did not hand in his homework today, he must not only consider his own subjective reasons, that is, he may be lazy, but also consider other external factors, whether it will be because of the power outage at home yesterday and the fact that he can't write. You can't make a direct conclusion about things, you have to consider them holistically.

Materialism emphasizes that the origin of the world is matter. That is, matter determines everything in this society. Who gave us life? If it's God, it's idealism. If it is one's own mother or something that exists objectively like nature, it is materialism.

The purpose of metaphysics is to find the eternal and immutable objective laws behind the development of the movement of things. The purpose of metaphysical knowledge is not to transform society, but to aspire to understand the nature of the world. As a result, the object of study is often something that is immutable rather than something like human society.

Therefore, Ma Zhe believes that metaphysics is one-sided, static and isolated.

Dialectics and metaphysics are relative, and they are distinguished in how they view the state of the world, the former advocates looking at the world from a comprehensive point of view of related development, and the latter advocates looking at the world from an isolated, static and one-sided point of view.

Materialism and idealism are relative, and they make a distinction between what is the origin of the world, the former holding that the origin of the world is matter, and the latter that the origin of the world is consciousness.

The concept of metaphysics was confused by Engels. There has been a shift in perspective in Western philosophy, that is, from nature to human society. When the perspective is natural, it is metaphysics; When the perspective is human society, it is existentialism.

That is, if your field of study is nature, no matter how strong your dialectics are, and you see the world from a holistic perspective of relational development, you are still studying metaphysics.

I have explained the materialist thing several times in the past few days. Look at my original.

1. Materialist dialectics and metaphysics are two opposing developments. Their antagonism is mainly manifested in:

1. Materialist dialectics looks at the world from the point of view of universal connection, while metaphysics looks at the world from an isolated point of view.

2. Second, materialist dialectics looks at the world from the point of view of development and change, while metaphysics looks at the world from the point of view of immutability.

3. Third, materialist dialectics holds that contradictions are universal, and contradictions are the driving force and source of the development of things; Metaphysics, on the other hand, denies the contradictions that exist within things, and attributes the cause of changes in things to the impetus of external forces.

Second, the fundamental differences and struggles between materialist dialectics and metaphysics focus on whether or not to recognize contradictions, and whether to recognize contradictions as the driving force and source of the development of things.

The opposition between materialist dialectics and metaphysics is manifested in:

First, materialist dialectics looks at the world from the point of view of universal connection, while metaphysics looks at the world from an isolated point of view.

Second, materialist dialectics looks at the world from the point of view of development and change, while metaphysics looks at the world from the point of view of immutability.

Thirdly, the dialectic of only rubber and material believes that contradiction is universal, and contradiction is the driving force and source of the rapid development of things; Metaphysics, on the other hand, denies the internal contradictions of things, and attributes the cause of changes to external forces.

The fundamental disagreement and focus of the struggle between materialist dialectics and metaphysics lies in whether or not to recognize contradictions, and whether to recognize contradictions as the driving force and source of the development of things.

1.Materialist dialectics looks at the development of the world from the point of view of universal connection, whereas the metaphysical task world exists in isolation, without a connected whole.

2.Materialist dialectics looks at the course of the world in terms of a movement development, while metaphysics deals with the static task of the world.

3.Finally, whether the two recognize that contradiction is the fundamental cause of the development of the material world is the most fundamental opposition between the two and the root of other opposing problems.

Whether or not to recognize the world is the opposition between agnosticism and agnosticism. Observable perceptual knowledge is divided into materialism and radical idealism, while materialist dialectics and metaphysics both belong to materialism, so this point does not belong to the category of opposition between the two, so it is not chosen.

Therefore, if this topic is single-choice, select ABecause item A is the most fundamental opposition between the two.

If the title is multiple choice, ACD is chosen, because in addition to item A, item CD is also the opposite of the two other manifestations of dishonest search.