There are only 30,000 people in a small county, but there is a high speed rail station, should a sma

From an economic point of view, I think a small county town with a population of 30,000 can be abolished, which can be combined with other counties to form a more effective management system.

When managing a small county, it is necessary to have a lot of manpower and material support, and at present, this small site does not need so many ** to manage, and merging with other counties is the best way to solve it, which can save more resources.

First, merger is the best way. After the merger of small counties, more manpower and material resources can be saved, because in the process of managing small sites, it is necessary to consume a lot of national resources, and it is taking taxpayers' money to manage the entire small county. It can be merged with other small counties around it to achieve a larger population county.

Second, the population of small counties is decreasing. This small county will definitely face the problem of population decline in the future, the infrastructure in this small county is not perfect, and the wages of many jobs are relatively low, which cannot retain young people. In order to pursue better development in the future, young people will definitely choose the big cities outsideSo the population of the small county town is in a net outflow.

Third, more resources will be saved after the revocation. After the abolition of small county towns, the state will save more resources. These resources can be invested in local economic development, any small county must have enough potential for economic development, in order to be able to continue to be eliminated in the future, for this small county, there is a high-speed rail has shown that the geographical location is still good.

In the future, there will be more such small counties in our country, and many young people are working hard to develop in the direction of big cities, so big cities are the future of our country. There will definitely be more and more small counties will face this situation, so the merger of small counties is also very necessaryThis saves resources and allows for more efficient management.

It should not be revoked, although his population is very small, but it has been developing, if it is revoked, it hurts everyone's heart, although this county is small, but the population lives very happily, and such a county should be encouraged.

Should. Because the small county town with a population of only 30,000 is too small to be conducive to future development, I think it should be abolished.

I don't think it should be revoked, because it will make it very difficult for people in this county to get around.

It should not be revoked. No matter how many people there are, there should be a high-speed rail station, which can provide a lot of convenience for everyone.

No, in fact, population does not determine the development of a place, and this small county town should be given a chance, not easily revoked.

No, the ecology of this small county should be maintained, so that the people of this small county can still live their own peaceful lives.

It should not be revoked, because although such a small county town has few people, it is very developed, and it is better than some large county towns.