Second tier cities have been working hard, why can t they retain talent?

Because second-tier cities have first-tier city-level housing prices and third-tier city level wages, this also leads to the problem that second-tier cities are always unattractive when attracting talent.

The development rate of second-tier cities in China has slowed down significantly in recent years, which is actually related to the lack of talent reserves. China's second-tier cities are not attractive enough to attract high-quality talent and high-tech talent. For these top talents, the first-tier cities in China are the best places to go.

Because the first-tier cities in China have concentrated regional advantages and national advantages in terms of resources. Therefore, if second-tier cities want to compete with these first-tier cities, they are obviously hitting the stone with an egg.

There are fewer job opportunities in first- and second-tier cities. Although the competition pressure in first-tier cities is very high, there will also be many development opportunities in the process of competition. Although there is less competition pressure and jobs are relatively stable in second-tier cities, this also makes there are fewer job opportunities for you.

Moreover, these suitable job opportunities are also facing fierce competition, and even when they compete for job opportunities, they cannot get the opportunity to compete fairly, so this is why excellent talents are reluctant to stay in second-tier cities, because job opportunities in second-tier cities often have nepotism. <>

Second, the wages in second-tier cities cannot satisfy the excellent talents. Although many people think that the work pressure in the first-tier cities is greater, at the same time, enterprises in the first-tier cities can give more salary returns to outstanding talents. Therefore, it can also enable good people to meet their material needs at a young age.

However, if you want to reach the salary level of the first-tier cities in the second-tier cities, you must become the top talents, and you must put in more time and effort to achieve such a high salary level in the second-tier cities. <>

Third, second-tier cities do not have the same educational and medical conditions as first-tier cities. For talented people, if they want to work and settle in a city, they must not only consider their own factors, but also the factors of parents and children. Although the education and medical level of second-tier cities has also made great progress in recent years, in the final analysis, there is still a significant gap with first-tier cities

If you let yourself settle in a second-tier city, then your child's future employment and study will not be well guaranteed. Therefore, for the development of the next generation, outstanding talents are also willing to work hard in first-tier cities. <>

Of course, in recent years, second-tier cities have chosen to provide a lot of preferential policies in order to increase the attractiveness of outstanding talents. However, these preferential policies are still much smaller than those in first-tier cities. Therefore, I also hope that second-tier cities can seize the opportunity to compete for talents, so that second-tier cities can achieve greater development.

It may be because the education and personal quality of second-tier cities cannot catch up with first-tier cities, so they can't retain talents at all.

Because the development of second-tier cities is really poor, no matter how hard they try, second-tier cities can't retain talents, and talents still want to go to big cities.

Because people in second-tier cities want better benefits. But second-tier cities can't give such conditions. Can't meet talents, so can't be retained.

The income of people in second-tier cities is much lower than that in first-tier cities, so many people go to first-tier cities instead of staying in second-tier cities in order to seek high wages. In addition, the welfare benefits of second-tier cities are not perfect, and there is a big gap compared with first-tier cities, so more and more people are reluctant to stay in second-tier cities.

Because contemporary young people always want to go outside to have a look and break through, they hope that they can create a world of their own in those first-tier or super first-tier cities, and they are not willing to live in the local area.

The development of second-tier cities may not be as good as that of first-tier cities, and there is a reason why they can't retain talents, because first-tier cities have relatively high wages or benefits, and talents like to go there.

The reason why we can't retain talents may be because of some deficiencies in our own treatment and future development, which will cause such a situation.

This is because in second-tier cities, its economy and all aspects are often not improved, including his salary, which is relatively lower than that of first-tier cities, so people are willing to go to big cities to earn more money, rather than compromising in small cities.

Because the development opportunities in second-tier cities are not very sufficient, it is normal to not be able to retain talents.

Because real talents will always like to go to first-tier cities for development, and will never stop their efforts.

This is because the economic development of second-tier cities is not as fast as that of first-tier cities, and at the same time, some employment opportunities and opportunities in second-tier cities are not many, and the welfare benefits are not as good as those in first-tier cities, so they are always unable to retain talents.

Because the development of second-tier cities is limited, and the pace of work is slow, and wages are relatively low, second-tier cities are not a good place for talent to develop.

1.Implementation of population control policies: These cities have been facing the problem of overpopulation, in order to effectively control the development of the city and the use of resources, a series of population control policies have been implemented, restricting the movement and settlement of population, resulting in negative population growth.

2.High housing prices: Housing prices in the four tier-1 cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen have been among the highest in the country, and many people have chosen to leave these cities when they cannot afford the high cost of housing.

In addition, the population of these cities is also facing cost-of-living pressures amid high housing prices, with many choosing to return to second- and third-tier cities with lower living costs for a higher quality of life.

3.Environmental pollution: With the acceleration of urbanization, the environmental pollution problem in these cities is becoming more and more serious, and low air quality has become a psychological burden for many residents. As a result, many people choose to move out of these cities in search of a better living environment.

4.Releasing the pressure of internal development: With the departure of a large number of people, the four first-tier cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen have gradually released the pressure of internal development.

These cities can pay more attention to the urban environment and urban governance, promote industrial transformation and upgrading, improve the quality of life of the city, and further promote the development of the city.

There are several main reasons for the population decline in first-tier cities:

1.High housing prices and cost of living: Housing prices are generally higher in larger cities, and the cost of living is relatively high. Many young people and families choose to leave big cities for small and medium-sized cities or villages where the cost of living is relatively low, because they cannot afford the high cost of living.

2.Urban Planning and Infrastructure Issues: Some large cities have problems with planning and infrastructure, such as congestion, air pollution, and inadequate public transportation. These problems have led to a decline in the quality of life in large cities, and some people have chosen to leave.

3.Social welfare and education resources: Although large cities generally have better sources of social welfare and education, these resources are often unevenly distributed. Some people choose to leave because of the lack of access to good education and medical resources in big cities.

4.Job opportunities: While big cities offer more job opportunities, competition is also more intense. With the development of small and medium-sized cities and villages, many new industries and jobs have begun to emerge, which has led some people to choose to travel to these areas in search of better development opportunities.

5.Urban Renewal and Industrial Transformation: Some large cities will lead to a partial reduction of the population when facing industrial transformation and urban renewal. For example, some traditional manufacturing and consumer services industries may be relocated due to urban planning or environmental protection requirements, resulting in the loss of some population.

6.Population ageing: As the global population aging trend intensifies, the proportion of elderly people in some large cities has increased, while the proportion of young people has decreased.

This can lead to a depopulation of cities, as young people often choose to leave their families and seek development opportunities in other areas.

In summary, the phenomenon of population decline in first-tier cities is the result of a combination of factors. To cope with this phenomenon, city managers need to reform and optimize at multiple levels to attract and retain talent.

Yu knows, invades and deletes.

Hello dear, happy to answer for you, the answer is: Hello dear, why; The root cause of the inability to retain talents in third-tier cities is the lack of development space and low salaries. Development space and salary are the root of the attraction of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, especially the attraction of elite talents.

Whether it is a traditional industry or an emerging industry such as the Internet, it basically all originated in cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. As for the rise of the Internet industry in Hangzhou, it is only a special case and has no universal significance. In terms of personal work experience, young people must be more interested in future development opportunities, and in second- and third-tier cities, there are still far fewer opportunities than first-tier cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen.

In terms of salary, the salary in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen is also the highest in the country, especially for young people who have just graduated, and the salary in second-tier cities is significantly different from that in cities such as Beijing and Shanghai. As a young person who has just graduated from university, if you return to your hometown in a second- or third-tier city, you may earn a monthly salary of about 5,000 yuan, and you will have little left after throwing away your daily living expenses; But if you go to Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen ruthlessly, no matter how bad it is, your monthly salary will be tens of thousands. The salary gap between the two is still relatively large, with a monthly salary gap of about 5,000, so the monthly salary of 10,000 yuan is definitely attractive.

<> Cause analysis:1After the implementation of the two-child policy, young couples began to reduce their childbearing. At the same time, the pressure and dissatisfaction of young people with urban life are gradually increasing, and they are more willing to choose to return to their hometowns to work as farmers or go to small cities to seek a more comfortable livelihood.

2.The uneven distribution of public resources such as housing prices, transportation, environment, education, and health care in large cities. Problems such as high housing prices, traffic congestion, and environmental pollution in big cities make people have to think about whether it is worth staying in big cities, especially in the economic downturn, and it is easier for people to choose to go to small and medium-sized cities for development.

Signal release: 1Big cities are no longer the only option, people have the opportunity to choose to live and develop in other cities. At the same time, it also reflects the guidance and guidance of the first policy.

2.Large cities need to pay attention to the allocation of public resources and scientific planning to further enhance the development level and competitiveness of cities.

Solution:1** It is necessary to increase support for small and medium-sized cities, enhance the attractiveness of cities, and expand the public service system.

2.Large cities need to strengthen the construction of basic public facilities to improve the quality of life and population attractiveness.

3.Enterprises need to develop and cooperate with each other in cities to achieve win-win development, and at the same time, they should also pay attention to social responsibility and contribute to the development of urban development.

4.Young people need to have a positive attitude and fighting spirit, take their own development and achievement as important goals, and also pay attention to the balance between life planning and quality of life.

1.Housing prices are too high.

Housing prices in first-tier cities have been high, especially in the past decade, and housing prices have shown a rapid trend. High housing prices have left many young people in these cities under great pressure to live and even unable to afford the cost of buying a home.

As a result, many young people choose to leave these cities and return to second- or third-tier cities in search of a more livable environment.

2.Rising costs.

In addition to housing prices, the cost of living in the four major first-tier cities is also rising.

From the perspective of transportation, catering, education, medical care, etc., the consumption level of these cities is generally high. As the cost of living rises, many people are starting to re-examine the sustainability of living in these cities and choose to leave.

3.Encourage talents to go to second- and third-tier cities.

In recent years, in order to promote the coordinated development of the region, a series of incentives have been introduced to encourage the flow of talents and capital to second- and third-tier cities. These include preferential tax incentives for home purchases, talent introduction programs, and more. The implementation of these has made many people see the opportunity to develop in second- and third-tier cities, and choose to leave first-tier cities.

4.The rise of new cities.

In recent years, new first-tier cities have gradually risen by virtue of their superior geographical location, good industrial foundation and policy support. After the development of the provincial capital, it provides an opportunity for people from the province to work nearby.

These cities have attracted a large number of talents and capital, forming a certain industrial agglomeration effect. Many people are turning their attention to these new first-tier cities in search of better development opportunities.

What kind of signal does this send?

1.The gap narrows.

With the migration of the population to other cities, the regional development gap has gradually narrowed. This will help to achieve a coordinated regional development strategy and promote balanced development.

2.Realignment.

Behind the flow of population is the adjustment of the industrial structure. With the flow of talents and capital, some traditional industries have gradually withdrawn from the historical stage, and new nuclear industries have developed rapidly.

This will help improve the overall competitiveness of the economy and promote economic transformation and upgrading.

3.The development model has changed.

The population growth of first-tier cities is negative, and the beam difference reflects the change of urban development model. In the past, economic growth was driven by the demographic dividend. However, as the demographic dividend gradually disappears, these cities need to seek new development paths, such as increasing industrial added value and optimizing urban planning.

4.The competition for talent is intensifying.

With the movement of people, the competition for talent between cities is also intensifying. This has prompted us to increase investment in qualified personnel and to increase the intensity of talent introduction and training. This is of positive significance for improving the quality of talents and the ability to innovate.

It shatters an expectation that large cities will continue to grow in an infinite and explosive way.

In short, the negative population growth of the four major cities is not only a combination of factors such as housing prices and living costs, but also a manifestation of the rise of other cities.