The Bird s Nest Incident finally came to an end, Simba won, what evidence is in Simba s favor in t

Simba is a very famous anchor, and many netizens like to buy things in Simba's live broadcast room. However, in the process of bringing the goods, Simba also did something inappropriate, such as the bird's nest sold in the live broadcast room without research is actually just sugar water. After this incident was **, Simba's own work was also greatly affected, and he was also blocked by the platform for a period of time, but then Simba made a comeback and started his career again.

Then Simba and the original factory had a series of confrontations, both sides were unwilling to bear all the responsibility, when the matter finally came to an end, netizens found that the original factory did have certain problems. <>

The influence of the two sides At first, Simba didn't know that there was a problem with the bird's nest sold in his live broadcast room, and even when netizens were accusing, he was furious in the live broadcast room and demonstrated it to netizens on the spot. even took out the quality inspection report of bird's nest to face everyone's doubts, which was later verified, and there are indeed various problems in bird's nest. Since then, both Simba and the original factory have received criticism from everyone, and the work of both parties has had a certain impact.

There is no such thing as an absolute victory, and although Simba appears to have won in this case, he himself has actually been the most affected. Although the compensation for this incident was paid by both parties, Simba's loss was not only this series of compensation, but his future career as a cargo. Before these events, Simba's live broadcast vision was very hot, and many netizens believed in Xing Horn, but after that, no one wanted to believe him.

If a qualified anchor wants to be a qualified anchor with goods, he must strictly check whether there are any problems with the goods he brings before bringing goods. Once you find a problem, you should stop it immediately and don't continue to sell it in the live broadcast room, otherwise it will eventually affect everyone involved. Although it seems that Simba can continue to live broadcast after this incident, his popularity now is incomparable to before.

First of all, the state of the bird's nest is relatively thin, and the ** of this bird's nest is not particularly expensive, so the ingredients are not particularly pure, and in this matter, in addition to his responsibility, the company also has a large part of the responsibility.

On the grounds of the "selling point card" provided by the original factory, Simba accused the original factory of deliberately falsely advertising the goods, and deliberately fooled the Simba side and consumers to make wrong judgments in combination with the "quality inspection report" issued by the original factory. This key evidence also directly led to the court believing that both parties were responsible, so the judgment was pronounced, and both parties shared the loss.

The proof of bird's nest, the sales channel of selling things, the relevant proof, the proof of many people, the quality of the product, etc., are all beneficial to Simba.

This person "sells fakes", so it's not too much to say!

1. In these cases, it is true that the bird's nest merchants have deceived consumers, and I think Simba's practice is also to save his reputation, which is his own right.

After Simba's "bird's nest incident" was exposed, everyone would first blame Simba, because Simba used his personal reputation to sell all the bird's nests to consumers, so Simba must pay the main responsibility to consumers. Simba claimed that he was deceived by the bird's nest manufacturer, and he also went through legal channels to protect his rights and interests, and also let consumers see the truth behind the "bird's nest incident", so that Simba could save his reputation and continue to sell goods through live broadcasts.

Second, although the final result we saw was that Simba won the lawsuit, we have to admit that Simba has problems in the process of selecting products, which is also an unshirkable responsibility.

Although Simba did suffer in this incident, he also made a high profit in it. Therefore, when he sells goods to consumers, he should do a good job of quality control, if such incidents happen again and again, then it can only be explained that it is Simba's own problem. A live streaming platform relies on the power of one person to sell goods, then this person must be responsible for all products, because you are the beneficiary of all events, and the risk and benefit must be reciprocal.

3. This incident makes us see on the surface that it is the responsibility of the bird's nest merchants, but in fact, we see the hidden dangers behind the live streaming, and how many of them have been deceived inside.

There are still many live broadcast platforms that are constantly promoting and bringing goods, and we don't know if this anchor knows whether this product has quality problems. I don't know if the live broadcast platform has conducted a basic review of this product, but in the end, all these products are presented in front of people. Many consumers find problems after purchasing goods, but it is basically impossible for them to return or exchange goods, because merchants will find all kinds of excuses to shirk, which is also a major disadvantage of many live broadcast platforms.

I think even if Simba wins the lawsuit, he won't be able to save his reputation, Now everyone still thinks that Simba's character is problematic, and many people don't believe in this final ruling, after all, it took so long to win the lawsuit, and we don't know what happened during this period, but the most important thing is that everyone no longer minds and pays attention to this result, as long as Simba is mentioned, everyone will think that he is a bad artist, so no matter how Simba whitewashes himself, it will be useless, and Simba will never return to the glory days of the past.

Presumably everyone must have a certain understanding of the Simba bird's nest incident, Simba's career is also going downhill because of the bird's nest incident, Simba's era is a familiar anchor with goods, at that time it was all the rage, but because of the suspected sale of fake bird's nest and was forced to suspend the live broadcast of goods, after such a long time Simba is burdened with the title of selling fake bird's nest, and I haven't seen Simba live broadcast for a long time, Simba returned to everyone's field of vision again but there is no previous heat, Simba's comeback was not only boycotted by everyone, but also complained by many people, so Simba decided to get up from ** fall and ** to prove that he was not suspected of selling fake bird's nest.

Simba won the case but lost his reputation

Now that so much time has passed, although Simba's fake bird's nest case has been won, but Simba's reputation has also been seriously hit because of this incident, and now Simba's career can almost be described as ruined, although Simba said that he won the lawsuit and received a high amount of compensation, but the lost reputation can not be recovered, and now everyone no longer minds whether Simba's fake bird's nest is true or false, because everyone no longer pays attention to and trusts Simba.

It's hard for Simba to get back into the spotlight

Simba's high-profile comeback still didn't bring good results, after all, Simba's fake bird's nest incident was too big, and after so much time, it was difficult for Simba to return to everyone's attention, and he could never return to his original glorious career.

I don't think this verdict is particularly reasonable, because he is a very big anchor with goods, and he has counterfeit and shoddy products when he sells products, which harms the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.

I think the law is always on the side of justice, and Simba didn't do anything wrong in this matter, so he deserved to win the lawsuit.

It is very unrecognized, because a lot of bird's nests are clear water, and Simba must know it, so it is not forgiven, and it is very bad.

Simba is so crazy that he offends people, he can only buy bird's nest drinks so cheaply, the people who buy them are too stupid, will the seller lose money to sell them? also sue others, for fear that others will not know that you are stupid.

I think it's a thing. There has to be a very fair and just outcome, so since there is such a result, we should respect it.

On the evening of July 17, according to the news** report, the final verdict of the "bird's nest incident" was releasedSimba wins!

The facts of the case restored by the judgment are as follows:In the process of performing the contract, the brand owner of bird's nest concealed the proportion of the ingredients of the product involved in the case and misled Simba, so the subsequent sales behavior was based on the misleading of the brand of bird's nest shirt cover Lu Naofang, and made a misleading propaganda act.

Therefore, the court ruled that the bird's nest brand should bear 30355459 yuan in compensation; In addition, this move also had a serious negative impact on the anchor of Xinxuan Company, and according to the application of Xinxuan Company, the brand was awarded a symbolic compensation of 1 yuan to Xinxuan Company.

In other words, although these two kinds of compensation need to be paid to Xinxuan Company, more than 30 million yuan is actually given to consumers, and 1 yuan is the compensation due to Xinxuan.

In addition, this also means that the "Simba Bird's Nest Incident" has undergone a substantial "reversal" after a lapse of 7 months, and there is a court judgment based on the "Simba Counterfeiting and Selling" that has been complained about by everyone, and the original responsibility mainly lies with the brand, which should be "the manufacturer makes and sells counterfeits".

Netizen views:

In this regard, some netizens believed: "The truth has finally come out", and they all supported Simba, saying that they believed him, and said that his handling after the "bird's nest incident" was very appropriate.

Some netizens still don't buy it, pointing out that his move is "whitewashing", since ** sold the product, he should be responsible for the product.

Simba will win the lawsuit because Simba has been whitewashing himself, and Simba claims that he has been deceived by the other company, so there is such a quarrel.

It is because this case is very simple, and the time when they buy bird's nest is relatively cheap, and the embedded mold balance is relatively cheap, so the quality of the bent product is relatively poor, and some additives will be added to the bird's nest.

Because Simba has favorable conditions in his hands, and at the same time collects more evidence, and there is also a lot of proof, so he will win the lawsuit.

One set in front of the person and one set behind the back, when he brought the goods, he swore that the products he brought were no problem, and he also said that he was suing others for spreading rumors, and now he is suing the manufacturer, what kind of good things are these Internet celebrities, and they will say everything for money.