How to write a chemistry paper score analysis, how to write a test paper analysis?

Analysis, it's two aspects. 1. Adhere to the good aspects, such as your own basic formula, and the basic knowledge is very solid.

2. Pay more attention to the aspects of mistakes, and no similar mistakes will occur next time, like some more complex but often tested. Well,That's basically it, hehe, I hope it will help you a little.。。。

The post-test analysis should generally include: a comprehensive assessment of the exam, i.e., which questions were done well and which were poor; Find out the faulty loss of marks in the whole paper, that is, the questions that could have been done well under normal circumstances but could not be done well in the exam; Classification and sorting of wrong questions, that is, sorting out the wrong questions according to different types, such as basic classes, and linking theory with practice.

class, objective class, subjective class, etc.

Find out the reasons for mistakes and the weak links in learning, take corresponding countermeasures, and strive to "not make an example", that is, not to make similar mistakes in future exams. Be clear that the purpose of the exam is not only whether you will do the test paper and how many marks you will get, but mainly to test your learning progress during this time.

The post-exam analysis should generally include:

Writing ideas and key points: Take the analysis of mathematics test papers as an example to analyze your key points in this exam.

Text: In this math exam, I did not achieve the desired results, which can be summed up due to the following aspects:

1. There is no review in place.

Before the exam, I didn't review the exam content carefully enough, which led to a lot of knowledge points that I didn't see, and as a result, there were questions in the exam, 2. I didn't do the questions seriously enough.

Among the questions that made mistakes, there are several questions that are not unknowable, but are divided because of carelessness that leads to miscalculations in the process, which is unforgivable.

3. Difficult questions are not well answered.

This shows that there are still many deficiencies in my mastery of difficult problems, and I need to learn further. Through this exam, I once again realized my own shortcomings, and in the future study process, I must be careful and careful, do a good job of reviewing, and actively homework problems.

The test paper has a certain degree of discrimination, the overall difficulty of the test paper is slightly more difficult, and the difficulty coefficient of sampling analysis is about the same. The test paper can be combined with the textbook to pay attention to the examination of basic knowledge, focusing on the examination of basic knowledge of chemistry and the experimental application of chemical Zen difficulty, which is better reflected in the requirements of the three-dimensional ability examination of the new course standard. However, there are relatively few basic questions in the test paper, which is suitable for the examination of the knowledge and ability of students who will take chemistry in the future, and is not suitable for the cultivation of learning interest and confidence of students who will not take chemistry in the future.

The main mistakes in the student's answers:

1. The concept is not understood thoroughly, and the learning method stays at the level of receiving knowledge. For example, in question 4, most students choose b, solution, and do not have a firm grasp of the colloidal essence in the dispersion system. 14 Questions: The four basic responses are not clearly understood.

2. The examination is not careful, and the answers are not rigorous. For example, in question 8, attention can be paid to the lack of "concentration", and in question 24 (1) ignoring the expression of electron transfer and direction, and question 22 (4) ignoring the word "burning", it appears.