Throwing paper airplanes down from the upper floors is considered a high altitude projectile?

Throw it down from upstairsPaper airplanes, sort ofHigh-altitude projectiles

The phenomenon of high-altitude projectiles was once called "the pain hanging over the city". It used to be ranked second along with "littering". Throwing objects from high altitudes is an uncivilized behavior, and it will bring great social harm.

The incident of throwing bricks and stoning babies to death has aroused widespread concern in the society after being reported. While people are choked by the premature departure of their 100-day-old babies from this world and the grief of their parents, a social issue about the threat of "overhead safety" by high-altitude objects in the city is a social issue.

It has once again aroused heated discussions.

Hazards:

There is data that shows that a 30-gram egg thrown from the 4th floor will make people swollen; Throwing it down from the 8th floor can break people's scalps; From the 18th floor high.

Throwing it down can smash the skull of a pedestrian; Falling from the 25th floor can kill a person instantly.

A small rock the size of a thumb can hurt a person's scalp when thrown down from the 4th floor, and a passerby can die on the spot when thrown down from the 25th floor, because the force can become very strong from the top down. Empty beer bottles thrown at heights on the 18th and 25th floors can cause fatal injuries.

The above content refers to Encyclopedia - High-altitude parabola.

Absolutely. It's just that paper airplanes will not cause serious consequences such as injury in the process of falling, and at most they will destroy environmental hygiene, so as long as they are not thrown constantly, dozens or hundreds, no one cares. Caught is also just criticism of education, who wants to be eventful!

This situation does not constitute the crime of throwing objects from high altitudes, and if the circumstances are serious and cause adverse effects, public security punishment or criminal punishment can be carried out.

Whether throwing paper is considered a high-altitude throwing object shall be determined according to the specific circumstances. Generally speaking, the weight of the paper is lighter, and after the stupid oak is thrown from a high altitude, it will not fall vertically at a high speed, but slowly fall in the air, in this case, it will not cause harm, and thus will not constitute an illegal act, but when the weight of the paper reaches a certain level and causes harm to others, it will be determined that it is a high-altitude throwing object, and the perpetrator shall be liable. The perpetrator shall bear tort liability and compensate the victim for his losses, and where the public security organs are able to find the perpetrator through clues, the perpetrator shall bear tort liability, and where the perpetrator is suspected of constituting a crime, they shall also bear criminal responsibility, and the people's court is to make a corresponding punishment in accordance with law; Where there is no right to determine the infringer, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall give corresponding compensation, and the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall have the right to recover compensation from the infringer after compensation.

Legal basis] Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1250 prohibits throwing objects from buildings. Where objects thrown from a building or objects falling from a building cause damage to others, the infringer shall bear tort liability in accordance with law; Where it is difficult to determine the specific infringer after investigation, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall compensate unless it can be proved that he is not the infringer. The user of the building who may have caused the harm has the right to recover compensation from the infringer after compensation.

Property management enterprises and other building managers shall take necessary security measures to prevent the occurrence of the circumstances provided for in the preceding paragraph; Where necessary security measures are not employed, they shall bear tort liability for failure to perform security obligations in accordance with law.

Where the circumstances provided for in the first paragraph of this article occur, the public security and other organs shall promptly investigate in accordance with law and find out who is responsible.

Legal Analysis: Throwing objects from high altitudes refers to the behavior of the perpetrator throwing objects from buildings or other high altitudes, causing damage to others and other serious consequences. Due to the characteristics of small weight, slow falling speed and weak impact force, it is generally difficult to cause damage to others and other consequences when falling from a high altitude.

Therefore, the act of throwing tissues at a high altitude is generally not considered to be a high-altitude throwing object. However, if the throwing is a pack of paper towels or a box of paper towels that is sufficient to cause danger and cause damage, it shall be found that the act is a high-altitude throwing object.

Legal basis: Article 1254 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China prohibits throwing objects from buildings. Where objects thrown from a building or objects falling from a building cause damage to others, the infringer shall bear tort liability in accordance with law; Where it is difficult to determine the specific infringer after investigation, the user of the building who may have caused the harm shall compensate unless it can be proved that he is not the infringer.

The user of the building who may have caused the harm has the right to recover compensation from the infringer after compensation. Article 291-2 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China [Crime of Throwing Objects from High Altitudes] Throwing objects from buildings or other heights, where the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to one year imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release, and/or a fine. Where conduct in the preceding paragraph simultaneously constitutes another crime, follow the provisions for the heavier punishment at trial and sentencing.

Legal analysis: There is no legal provision for the crime of throwing objects from high altitudes above several floors, as long as it is a building or a high-altitude throwing object, it can be convicted.

Legal basis] Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1240: Where a person engages in high-altitude, high-pressure, or underground excavation activities, or uses high-speed rail transport vehicles to cause damage to others, the operator shall bear tort liability; However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by force majeure of the victim, no liability shall be imposed. Where the infringed party is grossly negligent in the occurrence of the damage, the responsibility of the proprietor may be reduced.

Article 1241:Where highly dangerous objects are lost or abandoned and cause harm to others, the owner bears tort liability. If the owner hands over the highly dangerous goods to others for management, the manager shall bear the tort liability; If all the owners are at fault, they shall be jointly and severally liable with the manager.

Article 1242:Where illegal possession of highly dangerous objects causes harm to others, the person in possession bears tort liability. If the owner or manager cannot prove that he or she has exercised a high duty of care to prevent illegal possession, he or she shall be jointly and severally liable with the person in possession.

Article 1243: Where unauthorized entry into an area of highly hazardous activities or an area where highly dangerous goods are stored and damage is suffered, the manager may reduce or waive responsibility if he or she can prove that adequate safety measures have been taken and that he has fulfilled his or her obligation to give adequate warnings.

Article 1244:Where responsibility for a high degree of danger is borne and the law provides for a limit of compensation, follow those provisions, except where the perpetrator is intentional or grossly negligent.