Of all the farming industries, which has the lowest risk and the highest benefits?

The risk of raising pigs is the lowest, the market demand for pork is relatively large, and no matter what, raising pigs will not lose money.

The lowest risk is definitely sheep raising, cattle raising, pig raising, and these breeding industries are more popular, and the meat quality is also better.

Personally, I think that raising pigs, cattle, sheep, chickens, and fish is the least risky and most efficient.

In order to ensure the livelihood of farmers and friends, the "ban order" also clarified the scope of the demolition of the enclosure, to breed poultry and livestock slaughtered to divide, for a year slaughter less than 50 is defined as ** breeding, and a year of slaughter 50 500 is defined as a large breeder, Chungao for more than 500 years of annual slaughter definition of large-scale breeding, and large farmers and large-scale breeding are more harmful to the environment, so in the "ban order" within the size of the large size will face demolition, and** Breeding is relatively small to the environment, in order to ensure that these farmers are not forbidden to breed.

This in the middle of the large-scale livestock and poultry breeding pollution prevention and control regulations have provisions, more than 50 credit markets, not a pig, ** said to set up a forbidden area, to limit and the area should be ** consideration, livestock and poultry manure. In terms of legal concepts. In fact, large-scale livestock and poultry breeding and the expansion of large-scale livestock and poultry farms basically have three imitation aspects in the suitable areas for livestock and poultry breeding.

The existing breeding activities must be cleared up within a certain period of time, which plays an important role in increasing the income of farmers. The production of fishy odors and other aquaculture wastes has also increased rapidly.

<> scale breeding standards shall be implemented with reference to provincial regulations. The notice of the people of X Province on printing and distributing the "Work Plan for the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution in X Province" and putting it into use at the same time", which is mainly reflected in administrative regulations. This is not a question of banning farming.

Construction land does not need to go through approval procedures. Decree No. 643, year x, the fourth aspect is the guarantee clause. The fourth aspect is the minimum guarantee clause, the introduction of such a policy, the record, reconstruction, expansion of livestock and poultry farms to obtain the town, county, restricted area"Yes.

It is necessary to guide them to do a good job in the prevention and control of pollution from breeding, prohibit any unit or individual from raising livestock and poultry within the designated area, and prohibit the breeding of livestock and poultry within the scope of the established livestock and poultry farms. For points, lines and surfaces that meet the conditions for animal epidemic prevention, they are classified as centralized breeding after filing. Areas where chickens or other livestock and poultry are not allowed to be raised, mainly as buffer zones in scenic spots, nature reserves and urban residential areas.

In some areas, when demarcating forbidden areas and cleaning up, administrative regulations and other provisions meet the requirements of animal epidemic prevention.

Livestock and poultry breeding prohibition area refers to the area where no unit or individual shall raise livestock and poultry within the designated scope according to law. A no-culture zone is an area where the construction of fish farms and small farms is prohibited. In order to protect and improve the quality of the ecological environment and ensure the health of the people, the livestock and poultry breeding prohibition area refers to the provisions of administrative regulations and rules on farmers below the scale in accordance with the law.

It is strictly forbidden to build the area of breeding sites above the scale of breeding stipulated by the provincial people! "。

Which is more risky compared to cropping or farming? What is the reason? Farming is high risk for farmers, and if you are a farmer, the answer is high risk, which means you feel like you're doing a riskier business.

The market is too volatile, and it is normal to have a price a month, or even a price for a few days. If the market is not well controlled, profits will be limited. Lack of technology, as the saying goes"Interlaced like a mountain"。

When you're doing well in other areas, you may not be able to do well in aquaculture or farming, because there's a lot of technology in that. If you don't understand something or don't do it well, it's probably the whole.

<> ordinary peasants' lives are inseparable from planting and breeding. All true farmers probably know that there are certain risks associated with farming or breeding in rural areas, and most of these risks come from natural and man-made disasters that cannot be prevented. There is a problem with the starting point, breeding and planting is to make money, there is no doubt about it, but it has not yet begun, it is obviously wrong to treat breeding and planting as a profiteering industry, in the process of breeding and planting, everything is going well, smooth sailing, may earn more, when the ** is not good, it is already very satisfying not to lose money; And if the breeding and planting process does not go well and falls, the profit can be imagined.

Ordinary farmers have no sales channels, breeding or planting dry, there is no sales channel, is a very tricky problem, crops in the harvest season, always can not be sold, is likely to mildew failure, and the breeding of animals to the time, has not been able to sell, not only increases the risk, but also increases the cost of production. When it comes to the risks of raising sheep, there is probably a risk of disease and a risk of **. Rural sheep farmers inevitably need to pay attention to disease prevention, and the longer they raise sheep, the greater the price they have to pay.

Although the risk of traditional farming is much lower than that of traditional farming, the profits it brings are indeed limited. In other words, it is impossible for rural people to earn a living from their own few acres of thin land. However, if the sheep farming industry is developed in the ** era, if there are no accidents, the income from the sheep farming industry will make many people restless.

<>Which is more risky for farmers, planting or aquaculture? What is the reason? Agriculture, or cropping, is inherently a dangerous industry.

For example, a wind, a rain, a hailstorm, or a cold snap may cause irreparable losses to agricultural production! So it's not easy to be a farmer! But good years are a common phenomenon after all.

Although agriculture is risky, it is more risky than aquaculture. In addition to market factors, the spread of a single epidemic may cause a small family to lose all its money or even go bankrupt! Because the breeding industry must be fed every day, the cost of investment in the planting industry is higher, and the effort is much larger, and the risk is naturally much greater.

This is also the reason why the old saying says that there are tens of millions of homes, and the hairy ones are not counted.

This is why young and middle-aged farmers don't make a fortune by planting and breeding at the same time? And why do you want to leave your family and business and go out to work? Besides, if every family is engaged in breeding, then who will the livestock and poultry be sold to?

Do you enjoy it as a family? If so? What is the breeding industry?

Farming in the countryside is good? Farming or not? The severity of its reality is not as simple and easy as some experts, scholars and mentors on the platform who do not understand farmers, agriculture and rural areas think!

Doing agriculture is not a simple thing, the investment is not small, the profit is not high, there can be a meager profit if the wind is smooth, and a little negligence will be in vain.

Therefore, if you are interested in agriculture, you must carefully choose the direction of investment, do a good job in the project scientifically and rigorously, be sure to do a good job in production, and leave the rest to the market. As the saying goes, as long as we do a good job of the product, let the market decide, whether to make money or lose or have the final market. In our agricultural business chain, they are engaged in agricultural breeding and planting, and none of them are engaged in agricultural processing and operation to make money.

No matter how good the agricultural products you produce, the market will not make money, and those who are engaged in the processing or sales of agricultural products must make money. In short, be careful to make a ship of ten thousand years. We should be cautious in investing in agriculture, make steady progress, and avoid blindly making excessive investments and tying all funds to agricultural production.

In this case, it is necessary to make corresponding judgments according to the actual situation, and I personally believe that there are certain risks, and they should be combined with their own circumstances; If the soil environment where you live is relatively sufficient, the risk of farming will be high, but if you have relevant expertise in aquaculture, the risk of planting will be higher.

For farmers, the risk of farming is higher, it is easy to produce a certain virus, and it is also easy to have something not very good.

I think they're both at similar risk, so why bother? Insiders need to have rich experience and technology, and it is difficult to achieve the desired effect without technology.

Aquaculture is a high-input, high-output, and fast-yielding industry, but it is also accompanied by high-risk industries. The risks of aquaculture industry are mainly as follows: first, the input-output ratio is small, generally less.

Breeding animals have to be put into feed every day, and the cost of feed can account for 40 60% of the total income, plus other costs, the general profit of the breeding industry is less than 50% of the input. Second, the threat of disease. Aquaculture disease is the most serious threat, not good to deal with may be wiped out, due to the high investment, may be a disease will lose several breeding cycle to make money.

Third, market risk. The aquaculture industry often fluctuates, and the cost is high, and if the market ** decreases slightly, it may lose money. If you don't sell and build up, the daily feed cost can cause even more losses.

In addition, when the animal grows to a certain size, the growth rate will be significantly reduced, and at this time, eating only feed will not grow meat, and the backlog will only be lost.