What is wrong with Chen Chunhua, a former professor at Peking University, who has been criticized by

Shaoyang University "declined" a number of 985 doctoral students, and recruited more than 20 doctoral students from a certain Southeast Asian country. And they are all doctors of education, but the cost of introducing talents is very high. As soon as the recruitment announcement came out, it was posted on the Internet, and in the end, Shaoyang College still failed to withstand the "talent examination" that cost nearly 20 million to introduce, and the school supervisor was dealt with.

The point of questioning is still - the dignified professor of Peking University is also a "water doctor". This brings a bad head, after all, Peking University, this is the first echelon of domestic institutions of higher learningHow many people with real talent and learning can't get in, how can they still tolerate the existence of "water blog"? Secondly, if she can make a smooth sail in academic circles (visiting professor at many domestic universities as well as foreign universities) with a doctorate of value to be verifiedThe appearance fee for a speech is hundreds of thousands.

On the day of Huawei's cutting, Chen Chunhua responded that the 10,000 above-mentioned articles on the Internet were not written by me, and "Huawei is one of my academic research cases." So what's the problem? With the deepening of the discussion, Chen Chunhua's academic qualifications also aroused public doubtsThe "European University of Ireland", where he studied for his doctorate, was exposed as a "degree factory".

Huawei's door "superimposes" academic fraud", and the topic of Chen Chunhua has been fermenting for nearly a month. Chen Chunhua officially responded to the academic controversy on her WeChat official account. Subsequently,Peking University issued a statement saying that it had received the resignation application of teacher Chen Chunhua, and the university had terminated her employment contract in accordance with the procedures.

From this point of view, Chen Chunhua did not use a fake diploma to deceive and gain unjust gains. It is in accordance with a fair and open procedure, and the Peking University Development Institute is recruited. What's wrong with that?

Those who want to put it to death all day long and then hurry up, may I ask, what is Chen Chunhua wrong? No one else has ever used a fake diploma. Did you use a fake diploma to deceive you, or did you use a fake diploma to gain unjustly for profit?

Let's say that I enter a restaurant and am ready to sell it to customers, but it turns out that the ingredients are fake, it is useless. Do you have to bear the accusation that you "use fake ingredients in the restaurant"? Cracking down on counterfeiting is to fight its "improper use".

Instead of "obtained but not used" due to cheating, unknown, historical reasons, etc.!

If you look at this problem from a historical perspective, she obtained a master's degree more than 20 years ago, which is already very powerful, and whether it was the right talent recruitment requirements of colleges and universities at that time needs to be considered and confirmed. If she is not explicitly required to be a doctoral student, then she has no problem, but both she and the institution should clearly explain her educational experience to avoid unnecessary disputes.

Conversely, if the recruitment requirement at that time was for doctoral students, then the problems of the university also need to be self-examined. In fact, objectively speaking, she is not without real talent and learning, otherwise how can she be a professor in so many schools, otherwise how can she be hundreds of thousands of appearance fees for one class? It can't be said that all of these cheeses were "knocked" by her "water bo" education, and to a greater extent, there are platforms that drag her up.

The people think Chen Chun