Will physics become theology in the end?

At the end of physics, physics will be reduced to theology. There are similarities and contradictions between the two in the analytic answers. It can only be said that the existing research answers and logic cannot be reasoned to produce an analyzable answer, and it cannot be parsed in a short period of time.

To be reduced to theology is only to give the development of physics an existing answer, but it will inevitably lead to the study of an analytic answer in the future. Such as Newton.

Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein.

These three world-renowned scholars also classify as theology those statements that are now undestructible.

Because of the limitations of the available answers, the subject of physics can only be cited as theology. Second, the theology here has nothing to do with religious speech. Before reaching a conclusion about latitude, space and time, it is theological to talk and leave blank.

And when people gradually come up with a physical analysis, black holes, time latitudes, parallel universes.

The Dark Matter Mystery, Sixth Sense, and Quantum Mechanics.

And so on. <>

Reduced to theology, physics will eventually become theology. For physics ends up in mathematics, mathematics ends in philosophy, and philosophy ends in theology. We will metaphysical everything.

Logical reasoning is unanalyzable, theological.

It is also because of the vastness of the universe that the unlimited development trend is just right in theological terms. Everything that cannot be explained by current cognition and logic, and everything that cannot be explained by existing technology and equipment, will be classified as theology. <>

Moreover, some of the things that were once classified as theology have now been answered by physics, which shows that both theology and physics have something in common. Because I was given an answer to the physics that could not be studied in depth at present, and the research was fruitless for a certain period of time, I had no choice but to conclude with theology.

However, in the future, those things that cannot be explained and concluded at present and in the short term will find an interpretable conclusion in the repeated in-depth research under the guidance of development trends.

No. Because there is no end to the development of physics, and theology is not a science, the development of physics will definitely not become theology in the end.

I don't think it's possible, because physics is all scientific, so everyone will believe it, and it will not become theological in the future.

No, physics is a discipline that explains objective determination, and it will only become more and more practical and difficult to understand, and it will not become theology.

Throughout the history of the world, many great scientists have had such a strange thing happen to them in their old age, and when they were young, they were convinced of science. When you get old, you will become a god stick.

This was the case with Charles Darwin, the author of the theory of evolution. When he was old, he even publicly stated that one of the things he regretted most in his life was to create the theory of evolution. And so it was with our great physicist Isaac Newton, who became a theologian through and through when he got old.

Sadly, Einstein followed in their footsteps.

Why did they behave like this? I once read in a book the idea that theology and science are the same thing. Especially for those scientists who have gone to the extreme on their own path, they have already glimpsed the final meaning, and theology and science are a concept for them.

Just as we climb a mountain, theology climbs from the west, science climbs from the east, but we all end up at the same mountaintop, so we have the same end point, but we don't have the same way of solving the problem.

The most important thing is that science is now accepted by most people, and theology is only accepted by a small number of people, so many people think that theology is unreliable. Actually, I'm an atheist, and I don't belittle those theists, I think it's just their happiness that we don't understand.

Especially now there are some top scientists, some time ago there was a theory that combines quantum physics and feng shui. They think that each of our bodies is composed of many particles, not only the human body, but also the matter that exists, and in a narrow sense, there are two quanta, one positive and one negative, and what I am doing is a positive quantum, and the anti-quantum will do the same thing.

If the science and technology are developed enough, under certain conditions, I make cakes in Guangdong, and you can eat the cakes I make in Yunnan. In the same way, from the perspectives of Feng Shui and quantum physics, why can Feng Shui influence our descendants?

It is because the tombs of our ancestors occupy a more advantageous position, then there will be some good quanta in it, because our ancestors and we contain similar quanta, these good quanta will affect us through our ancestors, after all, the way of burial in ancient times was burial, not cremation as it is now called.

No. Because science has no limits, and science and theology are two different fields, they do not become theology.

No, theology does not exist, and the development of science must conform to the laws of nature, and it will not develop into theology.

The science of today is the theology of antiquity, and the theology of the present will inevitably become the science of the future.

The relationship between physics and theology is:

The former is that "existence determines consciousness" and the latter is "consciousness determines existence".

Because European society at that time was full of churches, Europeans generally had faith, and in his later years, Newton discovered many things that he could not study, thinking that only God could explain them.

This was influenced by their European religious environment at that time, and many scientists in the European environment at that time went to study theology in the later period, so Newton did the same.

This had a lot to do with the religious atmosphere in Europe at that time, plus many scientific things could not be explained at that time, so it had a certain relationship with theology, and many scientists at that time were alchemists, and Newton was no exception.

At that time, this was popular in Europe, and religious theology was more respected than science, so Newton also followed the trend to study theology, longing for some divine blessings.

Because the society at that time was a society where religion prevailed, and everyone believed in theology, because the supremacy of theology could not be doubted in the slightest, it was believed that all science was carried out under the guidance of theology.

In fact, Newton studied theology very early, but it was not recorded. He studied theology in his later years, because the society at that time was religious, everyone believed in theology, and Newton was also influenced by that era.

This has to do with the background of the time, which was particularly admired in Europe at that time, and everyone believed in it, and Newton was no exception.

3 All even physicists with extremely high IQs, with the expansion of knowledge and the deepening of knowledge levels, the scope of unknown fields expands correspondingly, if the thinking is divergent and cannot converge, then its existence is more confused than ordinary people, because ordinary people do not think about many problems, so the confusion is relatively less. Philosophers are different from ordinary people who are good at induction, they will cover a large enough unknown area through the appearance of concept establishment, and converge into a closure, at least they can justify themselves, and the realm of thought is completely different, and they will start with problemsDon't think about itDevelopment toNo need to think about it, gain constant self-confidence with minimal confusion.

Therefore, physicists need the guidance of philosophers in order to keep the well-developed brain mind alive enough to concentrate on more meaningful areas of science rather than theology. Some physicists were confident that if they still had confusion, only God could solve it, they began to study theology, and at the same time they began to go astray.