Why is it that the higher the education, the less skilled the person is?

This statement is not necessarily accurate, as the level of speaking of a person does not depend entirely on his academic qualifications. While academic qualifications can reflect a person's level of education and knowledge, it is not the only measure of how well a person speaks.

Here are some of the reasons that can lead to this impression:

1.There is no direct correlation between the level of education and the level of speaking. The level of speaking depends on a person's verbal and communication skills, which are not necessarily measured by academic qualifications.

2.Some highly educated people may delve into a particular field or profession and have high professional knowledge and skills in that field, but may not be good at speaking or communicating in other fields or in daily life.

3.Some highly educated people may be overconfident or arrogant, believing that they have mastered all the knowledge and skills and no longer need to work hard to learn and improve their communication skills.

In conclusion, a person's level of speech is determined by a variety of factors, including his language and communication skills, cultural background, personal personality and experience, etc. Therefore, it is not possible to simply link a person's level of speech to his academic qualifications.

Can I summarize the question as follows: The more educated people are, the more they are able to express themselves?

Actually, in most cases, this is indeed the case, the higher the education, the better you can speak, and all kinds of examples make you feel very reasonable and convincing.

But this is not always the case, and the focus of the summary is not on the issue of academic qualifications, but also on the issue of knowledge.

Why?

The higher the education, the broader the vision, the things and environments that he can be exposed to are different, he may read more books, know more people, and then learn and summarize other things from these people and books, so compared with people with low education, people with high education have more resources, naturally learn more, and have a higher vision, and naturally be more able to speak.

Also, most of them belong to this situation, and there are special cases, that is, those who die of reading, don't contact, don't learn, don't practice, only read, and are not as good as those with low education but have been in the society for a long time with high emotional intelligence!

In summary, the most important thing is to be in contact with amazing people to learn, try new things, this is the key to improving yourself, and also, live to learn all the time, it's never too late to start!

There is no basis for this assertion. A person's speaking level is not necessarily related to academic qualifications, and may have a greater relationship with emotional intelligence. There may be a small number of people with high academic qualifications, who are immersed in their studies or research, usually do not interact with people much, and are not good at dealing with people, which leads others to have this kind of cognition, but it cannot be generalized.

The higher the education, the more there is no or lack of common voice, not because there is no level, but because of the lack of emotional intelligence, which is closely related to social experience.

This reason is better than copying.

More. Personally, I think the more common reasons are: 1. There are differences in the communication methods of the two people, and one party is not suitable for the other party's expression; 2. The different cognitions of the two lead to the difference in ideological values, which do not conspire with each other and have too little intersection; 3. The level of education is mainly reflected in the difference of thinking, and it is not easy for thinking that is not at the same level to coexist; 4. Personal quality and academic qualifications are not necessarily positively correlated, and a great person with high self-esteem of knowledge may also be a social dirty person, isn't it?

5, this is also an abnormal phenomenon, it stands to reason that our highly educated people (not bought o (o haha) should be excellent people in all aspects, should be well versed in communication, but now some highly educated people do not even understand "close (first pro, then close)"! Isn't it a contradiction to say much else? Hehe, a little...

But it doesn't matter, things gather like people in groups. Haha

That's a matter of virtue, and it's the same as having money and not having money.

Hello dear. Some people have a high level of speaking and some people have a low level of speaking, and the reason for the low level of speech mainly depends on the individual's language environment, learning ability, communication skills and personal interests. Specifically, one is that the language environment and background that a person is exposed to as they grow up will have an impact on their language ability.

If a person is regularly exposed to a high level of verbal expression in their family or social circle, then their level of speaking is likely to be relatively high. The second is that different people have different talents for language learning. Some people are naturally sensitive to language, and it is easier for them to grasp and use language knowledge. And some people may have relative difficulty in language learning.

Third, in addition to academic qualifications, a person's communication skills and experience also have an impact on the level of speaking. Some people may be better at expressing their thoughts and using words and non-verbal expressions to communicate effectively with others. Fourth, personal interest and pursuit of knowledge will also have an impact on the level of speaking.

If a person is interested in language and culture, and takes the initiative to learn and improve, then their language skills may be higher. In general, academic qualifications are only a learning process and the accumulation of knowledge, and cannot fully represent a person's communication and language skills. Other factors such as language environment, learning ability, communication skills, and personal interests can all have an impact on a person's level of speaking.

On the surface, there is a lack of academic qualifications.

Many people think that "teachers with high academic qualifications have a high level", which is mainly related to the "academic thinking" that has been formed for a long time. Due to the respect for academic qualifications in the whole society, it seems that people with high academic qualifications can do everything well.

1. It is undeniable that teachers with high academic qualifications have advantages in many aspects. First of all, their theoretical foundation is more solid and professional. Secondly, their learning ability is first-class, and as long as they are willing to learn, they can make great achievements in teaching and scientific research. Third, they have a higher starting point and a broader career development platform. But is a teacher with a high degree of education a certain level high?

This is a big question mark.

Second, teaching and educating people is one thing, and educating people is one thing. Primary and secondary school teachers work with underage children, who have emotions and souls; They have different personalities and behaviors, and highly educated teachers may have strong teaching skills, but they may not be able to enter the hearts of these students and make students trust themselves. As the saying goes, "only by kissing the teacher can you believe in it", if a teacher can't get the trust of students, no matter how strong the ability is, the teaching effect will not be too good.

That's why it is emphasized that "teaching methods are important, and teachers' personality and character are even more important".

3. In fact, many front-line excellent teachers do not have high diplomas, they are the graduates of secondary schools that year, but because they get along with students, love learning, and continue to improve themselves, they have become the backbone of the teaching unit and the "good teachers" in the minds of students and parents.

The same is true for primary and secondary school teachers, whose teaching skills change over time. Teachers with high teaching standards and good teaching performance will definitely decline in the future if they do not continue to learn; Teachers who do not have a high level of teaching at present, as long as they maintain a state of progress, delve into theories, and continue to practice, can grow into "famous teachers" in the future.

The changes of people may become stronger and stronger, may become weaker and weaker, and may also have ups and downs, which has nothing to do with academic qualifications, but is related to the individual's willpower, interests, and understanding. Therefore, we cannot equate "highly educated" with "high level".

Fourth, in fact, a good teacher is not only a teacher with high academic qualifications, high teaching level and high level of truth, but also a teacher who loves students and is "student-oriented". They regard teaching as the most important thing; They love their students and treat them as if they were their own relatives; No matter what difficulties and setbacks they encounter, they can bravely face it, overcome it, and overcome it; They are willing to become close friends with students and parents. They don't give up on any student, even at the last minute, trying to correct the student's bad behavior ......

To sum up, the higher the teacher's education, the better, but the higher the education does not mean the overall level is high, and they are not necessarily better than the teacher with low education.

Through longitudinal comparison, we find that when young people enter the workforce, the importance of academic qualifications is becoming less and less. In the final analysis, whether a person can make a certain contribution to the company has little to do with academic qualifications, mainly depends on work ability. Another theory is that academic qualifications are becoming more and more important as society develops.

This is also an important reason for the rising number of graduate students in recent years, and the depreciation of Shiran academic qualifications seems to have become more and more serious.

Some people enter the workforce and think that academic qualifications are becoming less and less important. But when it comes to job hunting, academic qualifications are a key stepping stone. To a certain extent, it represents our ability to study or work, and a good academic qualification can give us the opportunity to enter a better platform.

When recruiting, large companies will also give priority to students from prestigious schools or talents with higher academic qualifications. Because a good academic qualification is, to a certain extent, a reflection of a person's learning ability. People with good learning ability can also make faster progress in their work.

If you can, it is also a good choice to work hard to improve your academic qualifications. The importance of academic qualifications can be seen from this, so it is wrong to say that academic qualifications are not important.

When we enter the workplace, our development depends on our ability to work, and has nothing to do with our academic qualifications. The size of a person's contribution to the company has nothing to do with academic qualifications, but is reflected by work ability. Many people have no interest in learning when they go to school, so their studies are average, and the final academic qualifications they obtain are also average.

But the ability to handle things at work is very outstanding, and he is comfortable in the workplace. Academic qualifications may be relatively important when applying for a job. But after entering the workplace, when we have a certain amount of work experience, the importance of academic qualifications is not so obvious.