During the Tang Dynasty, Japanese and Chinese were the same

When you ask this question, you must first have a concept, Japanese and Japanese are not the same thing, Japanese has been around for a long time, but Japanese was created by the Tang envoys based on the radicals of Chinese characters. In the days when there was no Japanese language, all written records in Japan were written in Chinese.

The language is completely different.

The feelings are very deep because Li Bai and Bai Juyi are proficient in many languages. There are also many Japanese monks who know Chinese, especially under the premise that there is no common language in the world, since they come to China, it is inevitable that they will understand Chinese.

Please note that Chinese characters are not equal to Chinese, and of course ignore me if there are other purposes.

The language is different, Tang Chinese was introduced to Japan and did not evolve into Chinese pronunciation, and Japan created their script based on Chinese characters, which is not to leave everything in the Tang Dynasty unchanged.

Basically, it should be the same, that China represents the world's highest level of scientific and technological culture.

There is still a certain difference, the Japanese just created their script after the kanji.

That doesn't mean that Japanese and Chinese were the same at that time, but just because the Japanese monks who crossed to the east had learned Chinese.

At that time, of course, Japanese and Chinese were different, otherwise Tang Chinese would not have evolved into Chinese pronunciation when it was introduced to Japan. At that time, it was true that Japan comprehensively studied the Tang Dynasty, but that did not mean that all the things of the Tang Dynasty were used as they were.

As for your statement that Japanese calligraphy is popular, it is true, but does this mean that Japanese and Chinese were the same at that time? This only shows that kanji was introduced to Japan at that time. Otherwise, according to your logic, there is also kanji calligraphy in Japan today

Shodo), is it the same as Chinese today? Apparently not.

It's not the same that the Japanese came to China to learn Chinese characters at that time.

The Tang Dynasty unified Chang'an, the capital of China, and compiled "Cut Rhyme", which mainly refers to Luoyang dialect and Jiankang dialect. In the Tang Dynasty, on the basis of "Cut Rhyme", "Tang Rhyme" was formulated as the standard tone of the Tang Dynasty, and it was stipulated that Tang rhyme must be used in ** and imperial examinations. In the Song Dynasty, on the basis of "Tang Rhyme", "Guangyun" was formulated.

In addition, in the Sui and Tang dynasties, the economy of Jiangnan jumped to the forefront of the country, and it was the cultural center of the Southern Dynasties, so the Wu language still has a certain popularity.

According to the research of linguists, compared with today's Shaanxi dialect, the Wu language in Jiangnan and the Min Nan language in Fujian and Taiwan are closer to the Yayan dialect of the Tang Dynasty, and at the same time, there are many pronunciations of ancient Chinese in the Tang Dynasty in Japanese pronunciation.

Conclusion: Tang Dynasty Chinese is different from current Chinese, biased towards Luoyang dialect and Jiankang dialect [i.e. Nanjing dialect] There are Tang Dynasty Chinese pronunciations that are almost correct with Japanese pronunciation, but only some hope it will help you.