Is a drought followed by an earthquake alarmist or a scientific prediction? How do scientists expl

This is a scientific prophecy. Under the action of gravity, the flowing magma sometimes forms a rotating and rising magma hanging spring, and the bottom of the high-temperature magma cave will form a magma hanging spring with less resistance and greater power, and the earth's crust will break through, thus triggering **.

This is a certain scientific prediction; Some scientists who specialize in ** say that there is a certain connection between drought and **.

Not alarmist, there is some truth to this situation, it is the accumulation of some experience, and scientists estimate it through probability.

This claim is not alarmist, but there is no absolute scientific basis either.

The main reason for this is that the theory that there will be a great earthquake after a great drought is itself rather one-sided, and this statement is mainly based on empirical theory. In real life, we need to look at a natural phenomenon through a scientific perspective, rather than treating it as an empirical one. If there is a major drought in one place, it is likely that there may be more frequent crustal movement in the local area, but this does not mean that there will be a higher level of local **.

What's going on with this statement?

This is the natural phenomenon of some experts after the drought, and some experts say that there will be a big earthquake after the drought. After a major drought in one place, it also means that there may be large-scale ** in the relevant area, and some ** may even cause serious damage to such social production. When everyone learned about this theory, many people were very worried about it, because many parts of our country have been hit by a month-long drought, and many people are very worried about how their lives will be affected by this.

There is no absolute scientific basis for this claim.

As I said above, this argument itself belongs to the theory of "drought earthquake", and the theory of "drought earthquake" has a certain empirical use. If we look at the meteorological data of the past, we will find that some natural phenomena are indeed related to the "drought and earthquake" theory. At the same time, not all major droughts will occur large-scale, so the theory of "drought earthquakes" will also have certain scientific limitations.

At the same time, because the crustal movement in different regions is different, not all places will be at the junction of the crustal movement, and the reasons for the formation are also very complex, so the "drought earthquake" theory can be regarded as one of the judgment methods of the first disaster, but it must not be regarded as the necessary condition of the first disaster, and the "drought earthquake" theory cannot be used as an accurate disaster.

There is a scientific basis, because the great drought means that the natural environment has been destroyed, and this possibility of causing geological disasters has been proven in many history.

Sometimes there is a certain scientific basis for such a statement, so some relevant experts must have studied some previous data, so there are some such statements.

In recent years, due to climate change on the planet, more and more regions have experienced frequent droughts. However, every time people encounter a drought, they always say that after a great drought, there will be a great earthquake. So someone will ask this sentence, is there any scientific truth?

From a series of abnormal natural conditions before the occurrence of **, we can know that there was a natural phenomenon of great drought before the occurrence of **. However, we cannot guarantee that every major drought will be followed by **, so there is a certain connection between ** and drought, but this link is not inevitable.

1. According to some current scientific knowledge, we can know that it is a natural phenomenon caused by the violent collision of two tectonic plates in the earth. When plates collide with each other, there is a high probability that the earth's crust will break at the surface of the earth. When the school ruptures, the temperature above the surface of the area where the two tectonic plates collide will slowly rise, and when the air above the surface is warmed by the heat on the surface, the air above the surface becomes a kind of mainstream weather, which is difficult to produce rainfall.

As a result, this could lead to drought in the region.

2. DroughtFrom a scientific point of view, we can know that natural disasters such as drought are mainly due to the fact that the total amount of fresh water in a certain area is too small, which leads to some cracks in the surface of some areas. From a natural point of view, it is mainly because there is too little rainfall in this area and there is too much evaporation in the air, which leads to natural disasters such as drought in this area.

3. ** and drought From the above statement, we can know that there is a certain connection between ** and drought, but the connection between them is not inevitable. In other words, there will be a drought before, but the outbreak of a natural phenomenon like drought does not mean that it will definitely break out**.

No, there is no scientific basis, because the places where there are ** are plate junctions, and they have nothing to do with drought.

No, it's just relatively frequent, because this kind of extreme weather is a harbinger of nature.

Not necessarily, there is no scientific basis, some just happen to have.

The drought is due to the weather, and ** is due to the movement of the earth's tectonic plates, and geologists and meteorologists have not found a connection between the two, so there will be no major earthquakes after the drought.