How to evaluate the theory of social evolution, about social evolution

The theory of social evolution is a manifestation of social progress, which embodies the continuous development and progress of society, and human civilization has achieved greater development and progress.

Evaluating the theory of social evolution, with the development of society and the changes of the times, each era has the seal of each era, although the society is in the process of orderly evolution and innovation and creation.

What to say about the theory of social evolution gives people a feeling of being unhindered, but no matter what kind of hardships and dangers are encountered, they cannot stop the pace of history.

Society is always evolving, new technology is developing, there will always be elimination of some backward inappropriate, unreasonable is that society is always spiraling.

The theory of social evolution is to say, in fact, the core problem, that is, the big fish eat the small fish, and the rich people are getting richer and richer.

The theory of social evolution is a part of the theory of human evolution, which cannot be seen in a short period of time, but can be reflected in a relatively short period of time.

I think there is some truth to this theory of social evolution, especially now that society and times are getting faster and faster, and then it can directly have different attitudes.

In the case of social evolution, the evolution of society is a normal process, and in general, the evolutionary direction of society is determined, and people can determine the future of human society as long as they study a certain direction.

The development of human society has always moved from a low-level society to a high-level society, and this is due to the fact that human development has promoted the development of productive forces, science and technology, as well as science, education, and culture. So the society will also get better development

The theory of evolution of society is to change according to the reality of the situation, the thinking of the people, and the thinking of the people.

Because society is definitely no longer progressing, it is constantly moving forward, because science and technology are constantly developing, people's thinking is more advanced, and it will continue to evolve.

As for the theory of social evolution, we should also be sure that our society is constantly advancing, waiting for the continuous subversion of previous conclusions.

Social evolution is the product of social development and competition, and is the inevitable result of the survival of the fittest.

The theory of social evolution is a materialist theory created by working people in their production and life, and it should be used for reference.

In the case of satellite theory, it is also a kind of master's degree with its rationality.

Everything you are afraid of will happen, and everything you have gained and lost, will be lost, so what else do you have to worry about?

How to evaluate the theory of social evolution? Socio-evolutionary man refers to the idea that the device is moving upwards in that normal process of development.

With the development of science and technology, society will continue to progress, and some things in society will continue to push us forward.

I think it still makes sense, just like the free flow of capital, people are constantly changing and evolving.

Social evolution is primarily a nature of evolution and the path of socialist development.

There is a book called progress, which is an illusion, and sometimes I feel that this so-called social purification is not actually progress.

All kinds of evaluations of the dream of social evolution are an idea of our own, and if these are my feelings and ideas, we are going to go if we don't have them.

There are correct aspects to the theory of social evolution, but there are still many problems that cannot be solved.

How to evaluate the theory of evolution at the time, right, this is very good, and it is better to write things.

In the case of the theory of social evolution, of course, social evolution is a kind of driving effect of slowly accumulating people through real life.

The theory of evolution has universal applicability, but we should not look at this theory pioneered by the old-timers rigidly, and understand its essence, which is what our ancients said, the basic philosophy of survival of the fittest. A theory has no goals, unlike political parties that have goals, and theories are designed to expound some truths.

Believe that Darwin's theory of evolution applies to the present.

What you mentioned may be a matter of historical periodization:

For example, according to Marx's theory, social development evolves in the direction of primitive society, slave society, feudal society, capitalist society, and socialist society.

But I think that the more commonly accepted mode of evolution is the ancient (pre-modern) - modern, that is, the Renaissance is the mark that distinguishes the ancient from the modern, and then counts as part of the modernization process.

Of course, there are also some scholars who add postmodernity after modernity, believing that modernization has reached a dead end.

The more important conjectures:

The Animal Tree Three-Act Explosion Formation Conjecture (or Three-Act Cambrian Explosion Hypothesis) is the "RNA" world hypothesis about the origin of life.

The conjecture of the "whole tree of life" tripartite framework (bacteria-archaea-eukaryotes) constructed by Wötz et al. is also known as "modern Darwinism" in the "integrated evolution" conjecture represented by Dubzansky

New Catastrophism" conjecture.

As far as I know, Lamarck's theory of acquired inheritance, which was once considered erroneous, is now considered possible by some experts.

I copied the ...... from the appendix of the Chinese edition of On the Origin of SpeciesI don't know much about it, so you can look it up again.

The theory of evolution is only a theory based on assumptions, which has no logic, violates science, and hinders the development of human civilization, while the theory of evolution is indeed perfect in Chinese textbooks, so it has staged a farce of pointing the deer as a horse.

First, from a long-term perspective, the rise of "social Darwinism" benefited from the "scientific" attempts of "moral philosophy". Since the early modern period, the West has been trying to reconstruct "moral philosophy" according to the principles of "certainty" and "universality" of natural science, so as to establish "genuine science of society and politics". It is in this context that Hobbes, Spinoza, and others laid the foundation of "moral philosophy" on "mechanics" when "physics" was in vogue in the l7th century, and when "biology" developed by leaps and bounds and became a dominant discipline in the 19th century, people tried to lay "moral philosophy" on "biology".

It was in this context that the "organic" socio-political outlook replaced the "mechanical" socio-political outlook, and "social Darwinism" finally came to the stage of history.

Secondly, in terms of specific historical circumstances, the rise of "social Darwinism" also benefited from the "Industrial Revolution", which was in full swing at that time. It was the "Industrial Revolution" and the formation of "industrial society" that accelerated the "metabolism of society", strengthened "social competition", formed an atmosphere full of "uncertainty" and "tension", and generated a Victorian ethos that advocated "individualism", "competition" and "strength", which was the hotbed for the birth of "social Darwinism".

Finally, in the context of international politics at the time, the rise of social Darwinism also benefited from the need for an "ideological" need to find a "scientific rationale" for the "dominance" of the "West", which was firmly established and rapidly institutionalized by the "West". In the 19th century, with the establishment of large-scale colonization activities and the imperial system in the West, people urgently needed to respond ideologically to the following questions: how to view the "domination" and "enslavement" of the "West" over the "East"?

How to view the "unevenness" in the development of various countries within the West, especially the strong rise of "Britain, the United States" and "Germany" and the relative decline of "France"? In this regard, the "quasi-biological" interpretation of Social Darwinism's "seemingly scientific" provides ample room for imagination and interpretation. It is not difficult to understand why, in the 19th-century paradigm of the international order, "race" became a central concept in the argument for "legitimacy".

First of all, it gives people a new way of thinking, or a direction, on the origin of life. Jumping out of a circle created by some god. Although it is still being proven, many aspects of evolutionary theory have not yet been proven, but at least it is analyzed and considered from a scientific point of view.

Is scientific research a process of making bold assumptions and being careful to verify them? It's much better than a fantasy religion with no evidence. At the very least, it has promoted the scientific perspective of human beings in dealing with problems that are currently incomprehensible.

Get rid of superstition.

How do you understand what is wrong and ridiculous upstairs? Do you really understand evolution, a science that has not yet been fully proven and has yet to be perfected?

Moreover, the theory of evolution has made great contributions to the evolution of organisms (including evolution and degeneration) and is a milestone in biology. Enabling humans to better understand other living things in nature is a foundational role for modern biology.