Should the theory of evolution be extrapolated to human society?

Updated on science 2024-04-29
13 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    No. The theory of evolution itself is a hypothesis that has not yet been fully verified. Social Darwinism is a very destructive heresy, for example, Nietzsche's theory and the caravan theory are based on social Darwinism, which has caused great disasters to the world.

    Sun Yat-sen's theory also fully illustrates that humans and animals are completely different, and people cannot demand themselves according to the standards of animals and animals.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Competition and mutual aid exist at the same time! It doesn't matter if it's a human society or an animal society. Competition is always the way to survive, there is no motivation without competition, and water that does not flow is stagnant water!

    However, the strength of the individual is too weak, so it needs the mutual assistance of the group to enhance the competitiveness, and if there is appropriate competition within the group, the vitality of the group can be enhanced, but if the competition loses the ground, then there will be chaos, and the natural group will be weakened! Human beings yearn for mutual aid and peace, but these are all naïve ideas, and competition is inevitable everywhere in human society (for example: unless there is only one store in this world, if there are two, then they must be competitors), and human beings can only guarantee competitive ground.

    Although the species takes competition as the principle, survival itself still needs to help each other, the sheep gather together to keep warm in the winter, and the penguins also gather together to protect each other's young!

    So, competition and mutual aid are not in conflict!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Yan Fu was the first to introduce the theory of evolution to China, and he wrote the book "The Theory of Heavenly Evolution", which expounded the principle of natural selection for the survival of the fittest. At that time, the Chinese country had this book, but it was only used to build jars. Later, it was translated to Japan, and within a few years, China was beaten to pieces by Japan.

    What did you learn?

    As for mutual aid and competition, I don't think it's a contradiction. Mutual assistance externally, competition internally, competition with the strong, and help the weak.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The difference between humans and animals is that culture is also produced in the process of human existence. Cultures are intertwined, and during the Qing Dynasty, the Manchus learned the culture of the Han people. The theory of evolution is mainly based on the survival of animals and the adaptation of the environment, so this summary is not comprehensive.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Human beings themselves are animals, so the same applies to the theory of evolution, but human beings are a special kind of animal, and their competition and evolution are not carried out in a genetic way, but in the way of ideological and national competition. Therefore, we cannot copy the theory of evolution (human beings are unable to eliminate genetically poor individuals and populations due to extreme material abundance and moral factors), fascism is due to the failure of the theory of evolution, but do not forget that the theory of evolution is indeed scientifically correct.

    So the desire for peace is actually a naïve and foolish idea, and throughout human history, progress has been driven by war......

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Basically, no.

    The reason why human beings can survive depends on mutual assistance and mutual benefit, and if the principle of the law of the jungle is transplanted to human society, it will bring disaster to mankind.

    Nietzsche's theory is not the same as social Darwinism, and Nietzsche himself has openly expressed his opposition to Darwinism and war.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Spencer's theory of social movement is a case in point.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It should be the environment, because of the changes in the environment, so these primitive animals are forced to start developing in different directions.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Of course, it is the wisdom, the environment, and our desire to live a good life, and it is because of these things that human beings become more and more powerful.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It is labor that promotes the evolution of human beings, because people slowly evolve into human beings in the process of continuous labor, especially in the palms of the hands The changes are very obvious.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Social changes and the spread of culture have promoted the evolution of human beings through these forms, and at the same time changed human lives.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The theory of evolution has universal applicability, but we should not look at this theory pioneered by the old-timers rigidly, and understand its essence, which is what our ancients said, the basic philosophy of survival of the fittest. A theory has no goals, unlike political parties that have goals, and theories are designed to expound some truths.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Believe that Darwin's theory of evolution applies to the present.

Related questions
5 answers2024-04-29

No, Darwin only focused on the evolution of species, but did not focus on the question of origin and did not explain the existence of complex organizations. Species have a point that suddenly erupts, and the only explanation is that the species God created it. The universe is big ** just speculation. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-29

The theory of evolution is actually a conjecture and inference of Darwin's evolution process of species, after people denied Aristotle's geocentric theory, Aristotle's other view "God created all things" was also abandoned by people, replaced by the theory of evolution, but the theory of evolution has not given a certain explanation in many aspects, and some of his views are not necessarily correct, Darwin himself said in the book: The theory of evolution cannot give a certain explanation in many aspects. For example, many organs in the human body are very delicate and cannot be explained by evolutionary theory, such as the eye, even if it is only 99% successful in evolution, people cannot see anything clearly. >>>More

10 answers2024-04-29

In old age, people will believe in fate to some extent.

Darwin married his cousin Emma, and three of their six children died in infancy, and the other three remained barren for life. This obviously cast a considerable psychological shadow on Darwin, and even doubted all his previous views. >>>More

12 answers2024-04-29

From a scientific point of view, of course, the theory of evolution is credible, because there is a lot of scientific evidence to confirm it. But for religious people, they choose to believe in creationism, and since it is their religion, there is no need to blame anything.

15 answers2024-04-29

Black can reduce the damage of ultraviolet rays, so white people have more cancer than black people. (The melanin in the black ** can absorb excessive ultraviolet rays in the hot areas of Africa, which is a kind of protection for **) This sentence is wrong, not absorption but reflection. The swarthy is not black, it has reflective oil on it, and a thick black hair protects the scalp. >>>More