Is there a hierarchy between good and evil?

Good and evil are the perfect state of harmony of things; The good is to be fully integrated, and the evil is to be fully integrated. Good and evil are relative dualities, and they are fat objects to be coupled. Good and evil are the state of things, that is, they have to do with facts, not with positions.

This is the truth of things. It's like apples, houses, or all sorts of other things, and it's only their relationship to other things that makes them what they really are. So in any case, it has nothing to do with class, especially with the position of class.

But if good and evil are associated with class by people, good and evil will have a class character, and they will change. Naturally, at this time, good and evil have nothing to do with the truth of things, but only with the position and status of the class. Good and evil are all affected and acted on because of the relationship between class, and they become the good and evil of any class.

In this case, even if it is good, of course, it is absolutely far from the truth of things, and it becomes a state of goodness to be reconciled, not a state of perfection. Anything that is the same as goodness and beauty, and because of this, it becomes the enjoyment of any class, the thought of any class, and so on. Is there a class of good and evil, enjoyment, thought, etc.?

Of course not. It is only when it is contaminated with the color of class, like a virus, that it becomes class-like. Of course, in this case, anything that is originally a fact is not the original state of things, and it has nothing to do with facts.

But does this kind of hierarchical thing have any meaning? As long as it is from a certain standpoint, it is all empty talk. Whatever you look at, whatever you look at, is also colored and covered with this layer of fog.

What truth can Bhawang get from this?

Both good and evil are part of human nature, and it cannot be simply said that this person is good and this person is evil.

Only in the era of high ideology has a distinction between good and evil, but it cannot be said that good and evil have a class character.

The theory of the mixture of good and evil refers to the Western Han DynastyYang XiongoneTheory of Human Naturepoint of view. It is written in "Fa Yan Self-cultivation": "Human nature is also a mixture of good and evil.

If you cultivate the good, you will be a good person, and if you cultivate the evil, you will be an evil person.

Angry also. Therefore, the horses of good and evil are also with! He believed that in human nature, there are both good and evil elements, and that the two are mixed.

The distinction between good and evil is determined by the cultivation of the day after tomorrow. Among them, those who promote the elements of good are good people, and those who promote the elements of evil are evil people.

The Theory of Sexual Goodness and the Theory of Sexual Evil.

Human temperament is the basis for good or evil. It is a compromise between Mencius's theory of sexual goodness and the theory of sexual evil. Jin Li Rail's "Commentary on the Words of the Yangtze Law" said: "The words of the field are the inner family of each pole."

It is similar to the Warring States period Shishuo who believed that "human nature has good and evil". Human nature has both good and evil elements, and the two are mixed. The distinction between good and evil is determined by the cultivation of the day after tomorrow.