Can a married man get divorced if he doesn t have children

Married men will not divorce if they have no children, because marriage is for two people to be together until they grow old, not to say that they must have children, as long as two people understand and tolerate each other, they can live happily. Life is actually like this, sometimes there are things you can get, and there are things you can't get and you can't get them, but it's also life that is as low as possible and better than happy.

Do married men get divorced if they don't have children? That's up to the man. If it is very poked out.

Undertaking. Or the work is very prominent. There is a possibility of divorce.

If this man is ordinary. He can't get a divorce even if he doesn't have children. Why can't she say anything after the divorce?

So now this resource is very gracious. How much do you say, he and she are good, and divorce without children. Without a divorce.

99% of them do not carry a divorce.

If a married man accepts and enjoys the life of a dink, not having children does not necessarily lead to divorce.

This is not necessarily, it depends on the feelings of the two people, those who have a good relationship can also live for a lifetime, and there are also those who break up, which vary from person to person, and cannot be asserted!

It's very easy, no children, no ties, maybe I will leave because of a little bit of anger, my good brother who has played since I was a child is with his daughter-in-law because of some quarrels, whether there are children or not, they separated, to be honest, my husband and I have also wanted to divorce a few times, there are really two children can't be separated.

Not having children may reduce the burden of divorce, but not having children is not a sufficient condition for divorce, as long as two people have a good relationship, deep feelings, and are in the same boat through thick and thin, they will definitely be able to fight to old age and be happy for a lifetime.

Can a married man get divorced if he doesn't have childrenIt depends on whether the married man's wife can have children, and if he can't give birth, the probability of divorce is still quite high.

Whether or not to divorce has little to do with the children, the main thing is to decide whether to divorce or not to divorce based on feelings.

If you have a good relationship, you will not get divorced, and you can raise a child.

Yes, this is a family problem, and some people are not married.

You didn't think about it until you gave birth to a child, don't you think it's too late?

As an adult, you follow a married man in a daze, give birth to a child in a daze, and now you are still living in an unrealistic dream, sorry for both the child and your own parents, what else can you do?

In short, you have to take responsibility for making your own rash decisions. It's just bitter for the child.

As for you and the "married man" having a child out of wedlock, it is a violation of the current birth policy, and if I am not mistaken, you and the "married man" will also be dealt with by the family planning department and pay social maintenance fees in accordance with the law.

In your heart, you and some of your fellow women like you are paying for your own recklessness.

But in any case, you still have to face the future life, you still have to face the current situation, for your future.

Hopefully mine will make you aware of something.

The children belong to the man, and the joint property of the husband and wife is divided equally, in view of the existence of children, the man will have more, and if the grounds for divorce are established, the court will grant a divorce.

The third party only has the choice of breaking up or not breaking up, and is not qualified to talk about divorce or not! Good luck.

Looking at the decision of the original partner, if the original partner kicked the man, the junior has a chance to straighten out. If the original partner forgives the man, the mistress will be sad. At most, get some child support.

This woman has a problem with her character.

That's to knock it out, people have a home, and they won't want you, why are you so self-loving.

If you have the ability, you can raise it yourself, and if you don't have the ability, you will be defeated.

Hello. You're the quintessential bigamy.

Although there is no marriage certificate.

But according to the Marriage Act.

You have children.

You're already de facto bigamy, and if you're still openly cohabiting as husband and wife, you're totally bigamy.

It is to be prosecuted by law!

I am well aware of the law of marriage.

If his wife sues you.

The man is going to be jailed.

As for you. You just have to insist that you don't know that the other person is married.

can not be held accountable.

With regard to cohabitation that constitutes bigamy, whether or not cohabitation is in the name of husband and wife, bigamy can be constituted as long as the cohabitant has children, regardless of the length of cohabitation. Men and women living together and having children are taken for granted as husband and wife and family relations, and should not be demanded in the "name of husband and wife". Also in the case of the crime of bigamy.

As long as your child is his, the child will receive the property.

*It seems that the sentence is not light.

He hasn't divorced for 16 years, which means that he doesn't love you, and it's better to break up, and you can't hang yourself from a tree.

It is not good for a man to get married if he is unmarried and has children. First of all, a divorced man has a lot of experience, let alone with a child. When many noisy women hear that the man is still with children, they generally do not choose to be with him.

In fact, the reason is very simple, first of all, with a child, your burden will be very large, some children go to school and get married, and so on. Another aspect is that if you get married, it involves the issue of having children as well, which is very complicated. On the other hand, there is the child, who has a hard time accepting another mother.

If it's a few months old, it's okay to have a liquid Sakura, without any memories and troubles, but if it's a very big child, it's very difficult, because in his memory, the biological mother will definitely be better than the stepmother. No matter what you do, it is very difficult for the child to accept that you are looking for a new mother for him, and some children will even be very rebellious and often do things that hurt you.