Who looks stupid in appearance? Left or right?

The face of a person who looks silly:

The forehead is relatively low, and the fortune of the lord in his early years also indicates a person's intelligence and intelligence, and the forehead is relatively broad, and this person must be resourceful, have many ghost ideas, and have a high IQ. On the contrary, a person's forehead is relatively low and narrow, so his IQ is also limited, and he is more wooden in dealing with people, giving people the feeling that "rotten wood cannot be carved".

The bridge of the nose is too low, and the people who seem to have collapsed generally have no opinions, and their action and combat effectiveness are also very weak. This kind of person is not suitable for starting a business, because the initial stage of entrepreneurship is very difficult, and when they encounter such a crisis, the first thing they think of is to give up, and the human, material, and financial resources invested in it will eventually be wasted.

The one on the right looks a little more stupid. Because from the outside, the right side looks more greasy, and the smile is a little ill-intentioned. And the one on the left looks upright, and shouldn't be too stupid.

In terms of appearance, the one on the right is more stupid, the one on the left looks more handsome and upright, and the feeling on the right is a little bad, and it feels stupid.

It is impossible to tell whether you are stupid or not from appearance, some people are wise and stupid, and some are clever. To judge whether a person is stupid or not, we should judge it comprehensively by what he says and does.

It's stupid in terms of appearance, it's still the one on the right, but a lot of times people can't judge people by their appearance, because that's often wrong.

My opinion, the first big eyes, round face, honest and upright face, the appearance is still a little stupid, yes, the second small eyes, thin, the first time I look a little cautious, look at it a little silly, it's all quite that or something. People don't look at their appearance, their hearts are the true meaning.

The man in red on the left is more sloppy. At first glance, this person is a person who has no opinions, what others say, and the most basic thing is that he even relies on others to hold his arms and does not dominate.

Well, if you're stupid, it's the one on the right.

I can't tell if I'm stupid or not, but I still think it's on the right.

I think it's still the guy in pink clothes and hat, mainly through the outside of his face, you can see that he feels like he is a very honest person, there should be no scheming or something.

The man in the infrared jacket looks more honest and honest in physiognomy, and the man in the vest is more shrewd in physiognomy.

In fact, I don't think there's a way to tell if a person is stupid or not by their appearance.

I can't see it, stupid or not is to look at things, not appearances!

This idea doesn't seem very clever to Ako.

The right side looks stupid, hahaha, comparatively.

Generally speaking, it is not possible to tell whether a person is smart or stupid by appearance, of course, there are special circumstances, that is, the person is already sick, which is possible to see.

Not necessarily. Although it is said that the appearance of the person is born from the heart, there are still many people whose appearance does not reflect the level of their IQ. Some people are very flexible in their eyes and have a good overall appearance, but they may be more talented in life than in learning, and they can handle very complex interpersonal relationships and make reasonable arrangements, but it may be difficult to solve a small problem in learning.

Some people don't look good at him, but he can easily solve difficult problems in learning, but he can't do anything about simple interpersonal interactions. Look at whether you are smart or stupid, which can only be determined by combining the person's multifaceted performance.

Whether or not it can be seen is a matter of personal ability, some people can see it, but a large number of people can't.

Can you tell if the other party is smart or stupid by looking at their appearance?

No, being smart or stupid is a matter of the mind, and this is a hidden attribute that cannot be seen by appearance.

But the clever and the stupid can be discovered through language.

If a person can speak well (not on Twitter, of course), know how to be measured, and know how to distinguish people from time to place, then he is smart.

If a person speaks incoherently, or is overwhelmed with sports cars, he is stupid.

So this has nothing to do with physiognomy.

However, physiognomy can tell a person's character.

For example, a person with a hideous and vicious appearance is a violent temper, and a pleasant person is a good temper. People with a bitter appearance must be introverts, or have a perennial unsatisfactory life, while those who are beautiful (not handsome) must be extroverts, or have a happy life.

This is what it means to see people's hearts by looking at faces.

Wrong, generally beautiful people have a low IQ.

Great wisdom is not about appearance, but about the fact that people who are truly intelligent are not understood because they are beyond ordinary people, and their words and deeds are regarded as dull. It looks stupid on the surface, doesn't argue with people, but actually thinks very clearly, and doesn't care about people.

On the surface, it seems to be stupid, referring to a person's words and deeds, not a person's appearance. Su Dongpo's "He Ouyang Shaoshuai to Shi Qi": "If you are brave, you are cowardly, and you are wise if you are foolish." It means that you are intelligent, but you are not everywhere.

Of course, what you say is that you usually act like you're stupid, but you're actually very introverted and have enough great wisdom.

If you just look at the appearance, I think the little brother on the right is a little better-looking, because the ** on the right looks a little better.

Why do these two people look so similar to me, are they brothers, or am I face blind?

But judging from the faces of the two, they feel like they are quite honest people.

Who is better looking? On physiognomy, the first one is better. It's not the same for each person.

Some people are not a person with strong vanity, although he is very rich, he will not show it, such a person is a real person, unlike some people, who have no money, but pretend to be very rich, always like to play big names in front of others, such people are very hypocritical.

This can only show that you can't see people accurately, and from the other side, it also tells us that although some people are very powerful, they are very low-key, they can't see anything from their appearance, and they can't judge people by their appearance.

First of all: people should not be disguised.

Secondly: low-key is the way to make money.

This kind of talent is deeply hidden, the richer the person is, the more low-key, and often the lack of money is a swollen face and a fat man.

It is true that the richer the person, the more he picks the door. They value money more.

That's why there is a saying that some people should not be disgraced.

I agree with the opinion downstairs, except for the poor nouveau riche, or the so-called gentlemen, people with solid family backgrounds are not public, and even many of them are very picky.

Because rich people are not necessarily willing to show it, the richer they are, the more simple they are, there is no so-called poor appearance, but they don't know how to dress up.

That person may have been born to look like this

That's people are low-key, and the more powerful people are, the more low-key (not all).

Psychologically, it is believed that people with good looks are indeed a little more popular than people with average appearance.

However, if a person looks average, he can make up for it from the following aspects:

1. Build good interpersonal relationships. This society is a society of interpersonal relationships, with your kindness and kindness to interact with friends, colleagues, and leaders around you, interpersonal relationships are good, and your appearance is not important, maybe people will think you are more credible.

2. Create your own temperament. Appearance is nothing more than the difference between handsome and not handsome, beautiful and not beautiful, but in fact, the most convincing thing is temperament. You can pay more attention to the dress of some people who belong to your own class, find out a general route, and then develop your own temperament route on this basis.

As the saying goes: people want clothes, and Buddhas need gold. When you dress up properly, your temperament will come out, and you will have a convincing temperament.

Judging from the content of the question, the landlord may not be very satisfied with his appearance, and may have encountered difficulties in job hunting, love, communication, etc., but there is no need to be depressed. Because first of all, you have to know that there must be more people in this world who are worse looking than you, and what you can do is the two aspects I told you above, in fact, there are many movie stars, such as Nicolas Cage, who are not handsome, but his temperament has conquered so many fans, this is a good example.

I hope that the landlord will get out of the shadow of distress as soon as possible and show his own characteristics

If you look at it from the side, he looks very handsome and sunny, and he should be the kind of boy who will hurt girls.

I can't judge it from the physiognomy, so how about asking a part of the face? This...

Is there an avatar? Why didn't you see it.

The second group is good-natured and righteous. The third group is beautiful on the lower left.

None of them, I think you want to feel like Aunt Luo Meiwei.

If possible, send them all to my room tonight, I need to know more about them one by one