Are humans the masters of nature? Is it possible to do whatever you want?

Human beings are indeed adults, and the masters of nature cannot do as they please, but must follow the laws of nature.

China's natural resources are abundant in total, but the per capita resources are insufficient Many of China's natural resources are not only large in total and in the forefront of the world, but also have many types, and are countries with relatively complete mineral resources in the world. On the one hand, China's population is growing too fast, and on the other hand, the available reserve land resources are insufficient, and the phenomenon of indiscriminate occupation of cultivated land is very serious. Scientific and rational use of natural resources, protection of the environment, exploration of new energy, so that renewable resources are constantly updated, non-renewable resources are rationally utilized

So the answer is:

Humans have always wanted to overcome nature, but sometimes nature is very difficult to overcome. Many natural disasters are irresistible, let alone arbitrary.

Yes, no, not many people can live as they please.

If human beings enter the four-dimensional space, can they do whatever they want? Scientists give the answer.

This statement is false.

Regarding the relationship between man and nature, human understanding has undergone a process of development, and in primitive societies, because people's productivity level was very low, they worshiped nature and believed that nature was invincible.

With the development of science and technology in the industrial revolution, human beings are expanding day by day, believing that man is the master of nature and can control and use nature as he wants.

However, with the destruction of the environment brought about by human beings in the process of using nature, nature has taken a series of revenge on human beings, human beings have increasingly realized that man and nature should live in harmony, should respect nature, protect nature, and be friends of nature.

This sentence is not true, the logic is wrong.

Man is one of the products of nature and lives in nature; Man is the object, nature is the subject, and man should be in awe of nature, because nature is perfect.

This sentence is very wrong, no one can dominate nature, not even the gods.

This sentence is not scientific enough. Humans can only obey nature. Take advantage of nature. And not to dominate.

Humans can't do what they want, because they really get a revenge from nature.

Then it depends on what nature is mentioned here, is it the natural law of the operation of the vast universe of heaven and earth, or the natural life of plants, animals, and creatures between heaven and earth?

If it is a vast law of nature, then man is only very small, just like what we can only vaguely see with a microscope. How can you dominate it?

If it is a life that exists between heaven and earth. Then it can be said that man has already dominated.

If it weren't for nature, you wouldn't be alive until now, and all the material is what human beings want from nature. If nature is gone, so will humanity.

There is a ** that says how the earth would change if there were no human beings. At first, cars on land would crash everywhere, and airplanes and other objects in the sky would fall from the sky, and then over time, the houses would gradually become unsupportable, and slowly collapse, and human civilization would disappear because it was only written down on paper. All the wisdom of human beings will disappear under the eyes of the bridge of time, but this knowledge disappears quickly, but it is not easy to come by, which is the continuous exploration of human beings.

Two or three months later, the pets raised by humans gradually died in cages because of lack of food. It is very heartbreaking when I see this, there are so many people in the world and so many homes, there must be many families with pets, but as soon as this human disappears, these pets will also disappear. And this feeling is different, but it would be better if these animals died all at once, but they would also be starved to death slowly and slowly, and it would be very uncomfortable.

Then many machines will be left unmanaged, and the resources and environment will be seriously damaged, until many years later, all places will be covered with plants, and the earth will be full of other species. Although there would have been many disasters without humans in the beginning, nature was hundreds of times better than it is now. Therefore, without human beings, nature would be better, but human beings need nature.

Because of human vanity, endless desires are inverted, many animals have been killed, and tall houses, how many trees have been used to build like this. Without nature, people would not be able to find food, they would not be able to drink water, and they would naturally perish. Now there are a lot of animals because of the human race on the verge of extinction.

Calling on people to stop destroying nature and killing animals ......