Is the party who takes the initiative to break up the party the negative person? What do you think a

I saw a sentence and felt very agreeable, choose to be together when you like it, and separate neatly when you don't love it, you don't have to drag it out. Isn't that the case between men and women, who come together because of feelings or other reasons, and choose to separate when the relationship or the thing that holds the relationship between the two is gone. Some people on the Internet have suggested that the party who takes the initiative to break up is the negative person, and whether the party who is broken up is the loser.

In fact, as long as one of the two proposes to break up, both of them can be regarded as lovelorn. Falling in love is a matter of two people, and no one can get out of it. When a relationship really can't go on, taking the initiative to break up may be a relief for both people.

When one partner is not in love, offering to break up is letting the other party go. Therefore, the person who takes the initiative to break up is not necessarily a negative person, and the reason for breaking up is because the two people are really not suitable to be together.

1. Those who take the initiative to break up are not necessarily negative people. Unless there is a problem with the character of the party who took the initiative to break up, this situation should be different. Otherwise, there must be a reason why a person proposes to break up, such as an obvious feeling that the two are not suitable to be together; For example, there is no affection between two people anymore.

At this time, it is a good thing for both people to propose a breakup.

Second, mentioning the breakup shows that the relationship is indeed difficult to continue. mentioning the breakup shows that the relationship between the two is indeed difficult to continue, and in this case, breaking up may not be a good choice. The proposal to break up is to really see this form clearly, realize that it is indeed impossible for two people to continue, and decisively choose to end.

3. It's better to end it immediately if you don't love it than to drag each other on. If you don't love the immediate separation, it's better than procrastination and not ending, and finally resort to cold violence.

Or it is better to have a third party intervene. No one can say anything about feelings, it is difficult to guarantee that you will only love one person for a lifetime, and it will end in time when you don't love, although there will be a period of sadness, but this pain is temporary and can be passed.

No, it is difficult for outsiders to understand what kind of reason the two parties broke up in this matter, and they cannot judge arbitrarily, it will only affect the lives of the two of them in the future.

No. If you break up, it must be that the two parties are very different in terms of three views and have contradictions in life, so it will lead to a breakup.

Since you have the idea of breaking up, it proves that there is a problem between you, and it is not necessarily that the person who mentions the breakup first is a negative person, but since you have broken up, you should respect your ex.

No. I think it's sad to break up, and sometimes many couples choose to break up because of impulse.

Those who take the initiative to break up are not necessarily negative people. I think the matter of breaking up depends on personal wishes, if you feel that it is not suitable for the other person, then simply break up, don't hang the other party, and waste the time of two people.

It's not that taking the initiative to break up is a negative person, I think that if the other party touches your bottom line, then you can talk about breaking up at any time, because he has already disappointed you once, and there will definitely be a second time.

I don't think so. I think this shows that the fate of two people is weakened, or there is no way to adjust the contradiction, and dealing with this relationship in time will make you less sad.

No. I don't think it's a person's fault to break up. There must be some problems with both of them. It may affect the next development of the relationship between the two people, so if you propose to break up, you can stop the loss in time.

I don't think so. Breaking up is sometimes a better thing for both parties, maybe two people are not suitable at all, so don't spend your feelings together.

I don't think so, no matter who it is, as long as you have paid in this relationship, you won't be sad, sadness is for sure, it's just a matter of degree. Because the party who proposed the breakup first, they are already mentally prepared and may have previewed it many times in their hearts, so they may be more acceptable, and conversely, those who are notified of the breakup may be a little more sad.

Let's be honest,There is no one in the relationship who does not give at all, otherwise there is no way to continue this relationship。So there's no one who doesn't feel sadIt doesn't matter if he proposes to break up first or is notified of the breakup, he will be sad。Because people have feelings, it is inevitable that they will be sad.

Because breaking up is always a sad thing, it's just that one of the two people will always be a little sadder.

There are many people who accuse those who propose to break up of being scumbags, saying that they don't miss old feelings at all and don't feel sad, but I personally think this is a wrong view. They may just not be sad in front of you, or not as sad as youBecause everyone's ability to bear it is differentYou may be so sad that you cry bitterly, and he is just expressionless. But if you can't question him, you won't be sad or sad, otherwise, you should question why you fell in love with him.

So,People are sad, don't look at each other as victims, they will propose that there may be many reasons for breaking up, it may be that they can't stand it, they may have changed their minds, or they may not love each other. But you can't deny that he really loved you, and you can't question whether the other party is not sad. Everyone has their own way of managing and venting their emotions, and not everyone is the same.

In fact, if you don't dare to break up with that party, it will be sad, originally we lived happily together, and no one thought that it would be to the point of breaking up, so both of them are sad.

People who don't know are emotional animals, and they chose to be together because of each other's attraction, and when they get along together, they will slowly develop feelings, and breaking up is a matter of two people, so they will be sad.

No, a breakup is something that makes both parties sad. The party who proposes to break up wants to end the pain as soon as possible.

It depends on what the reason for the breakup is proposed, but the degree of sadness is different, and the party who is broken up should be more sad, and it is not easy to fall in love.

The party who proposes to break up will be ready first, not that he will not be sad He made a difficult choice for you in advance, and once this choice is made, it means that he will hide it whether he is sad or not.

The party who proposed to break up.

It's going to be sad too.

After all, two people are together.

There are still feelings.

It's just that because he feels that it's not appropriate for everyone to be together.

Or personality incompatibility, etc.

will propose to break up.

At the time of proposing a breakup.

They can be sad too.

It doesn't have to depend on the circumstances under which it was said.

Not necessarily, some breakups are also forced to do so.

Depending on the situation, it depends on what the reason is.

No. The person who takes the initiative to break up is not necessarily a negative person, mainly because they feel that each other is too tired in this relationship, or they feel that they have three views that do not agree with each other, and they can no longer bear to be tortured in this relationship, so they will want to break up.

In reality, many people think that the person who takes the initiative to mention the breakup must be unloving or have already found a spare tire.

At this time, it is easy to give the broken up a sense of abandonment, feeling very frustrated and helpless. But the person who takes the initiative to break up is not unloved, and there are several situations when it comes to breaking up.

1. The other party can't satisfy himselfA sense of security

For example, some girls need to have a relatively full sense of security in love, and at this time, boys are always unwilling to compromise, or coax, or don't want to take care of it at all, and then continue to take care of girls' emotions. At this time, girls will not be able to deal with their emotions and not be cared for by the other party, so they will mistakenly think that the other party is not in love, and they will choose to break up at this time.

2. Breaking up is really a feeling that the relationship is very tiring

People tend to be like this, and they are not particularly affectionate people. During the period of hot love, the body has hormones.

There is a compromise for the other party at all times, but after getting along for a long time, you find that the other party has too many shortcomings, and at this time, you will become more and more disused to the other party, and you are always finding fault with each other in such a state. Over time, there was too much negative energy in the family, and the relationship between the two became worse and worse, and finally the person who couldn't stand it mentioned breaking up.

3. At the end of fate, it is not up to anyone

As the saying goes, everything is fate, and nothing is up to anyone. In life, we have a saying, that is, "there is a fate to meet thousands of miles away, but there is no fate to meet on the other side". This is to say, the two meet and know each other and love each other, and there needs to be a fate behind all this.

When fate comes to an end, even if you love each other again, you will have to separate. For example, many couples nowadays, because one of the other party is sick, they are unwilling to let the other party have a psychological burden, and they will choose to let go at this time.

All in all, if couples meet if they love, please love deeply, if they don't, please let go, and remember not to go to extremes in everything, and to deal with all the things that separate you gently.

This is not necessarily a negative person, you have to see the situation clearly. If you like you and after being with you, you secretly like someone else to break up with you again. Then this is the negative person who cheats on your feelings.

If it is after two people get along, and the party who feels that it is not suitable to break up, then it is not a negative person.

It can't be confused at all, and it has nothing to do with taking the initiative to break up, but most of the time the person who has been disappointed will take the initiative to break up. It is very reasonable to propose a breakup when there is a problem in the relationship, and it is not good for anyone to blindly drag it out.

The party who took the initiative to break up is not a negative person, but he is the first to find that the two parties are not suitable for being together, and continuing to stay together will only make both parties feel uncomfortable. That's why he took the initiative to break up.

I think the person who takes the initiative to break up is not necessarily the negative person, it may also be the party who has been hurt more, she doesn't want to continue to be hurt, and she can't hold on, so after careful consideration, she can't bear to break up, we can't judge others based on our own opinions.

The person who takes the initiative to break up is not a negative person, because it is not suitable for two people to be together and often quarrel, so the breakup is good for both parties.

Yes, because the person who offered to break up has a new candidate, and this person is tired of the other person and does not want to be with this person anymore.

I don't think so, the relationship between two people has come to an end, and one day it may be proposed by the other party, and the person who proposes it must have struggled for a long time in his heart.

No. The relationship is very complicated, and it doesn't necessarily mean that the person who broke up is the one who disappoints the other party. People's situations are different.

No, because two people influence each other in their love life, and if one of them feels that they are not suitable to be together, it is also good to separate as soon as possible.

It's not like that, it's likely just that the reality is that it is more appropriate to break up.

No, the party who proposed to break up is actually very sad, but pretends to be calm on the surface.

It is precisely because I know that I have paid 100% sincerity before, and I have never had any intention of leaving, when I find that the disappointment has reached a certain level and the damage has been done, I will almost despair to the point of being overwhelmed. I didn't know how to face him because I knew I couldn't go back.

We are in a long-distance relationship, and it used to be hard but also very happy. He had just found a job and came to see me at the time of the breakup, and yes, he often traveled across the continent to see me.

But all his goodness, our beautiful past, and the happiness we had when we were with him, seemed to be constantly pressing down like the waves of the sea, to break this decisive but compelled decision.

However, I was really helpless, because the relationship had changed, and I couldn't get along with him like before, and I didn't even know how to continue to communicate. So I will try my best to take a break, keep myself busy, participate in various activities, join various organizations, and try the dance that I have never learned. Even though I'll listen to it over and over again, it's all the songs that I sang to him.

Tangled, shy, happy, warm, touched, desperate, sad, give up. At the same time, he arrogantly thought that I would definitely contact him, that I must just be angry, that I would be reluctant to give him, and that I would continue to sing to him. Of course, when he faced my continued coldness and non-response, his continuous concern and greetings gradually turned into harsh reproach - blaming me for giving up ruthlessly.

Yes, I was so strong that even my best girlfriends abroad were amazed at my calmness, but I never felt it. When I told him to break up, he started crying out of shape, but I pretended to be calm on the surface. I try to manage my life so that I don't get enveloped in sadness, which seems to others to be apathy.

I would cry silently in the laboratory, usually when there was no one, once I couldn't control it and cried in front of my classmates, he was still kind, and silently took me a can of ice cream.

I don't like to cry in front of others, especially when I know that others are enjoying the sweetness of love. Moreover, it's good to be sad to chew alone, crying out, or getting drunk, it won't go away.

So I pretended to be even happier than when I was with him before, and I got used to making myself busier and started **** makeup and maintenance.