20 years ago, was a house really cheap enough to be picked up for nothing?

I don't think so. It's just that houses were cheaper in the past than they are now, but I still don't agree with the idea of picking them up for nothing. The money is all earned by one's own hard work, how can there be any reason to pick it up for nothing. Just describe how cheap it is.

Wait until 20 years later, and look back, it is estimated that the current house is equivalent to picking up for nothing.

The house 20 years ago was indeed quite cheap and affordable for the average family, but it cannot be said to be for nothing.

I don't think so, it would be a very low salary, and it would be difficult for the family to buy a house with the salary at that time.

I feel that this sentence is a bit exaggerated, although the house was very cheap 20 years ago, but it is not to the point where it is equivalent to picking it up for nothing.

No, the house 20 years ago was in line with the price of the time, well, in general, it was adjusted according to the material standard of living.

It is not said that it is so cheap that it is for nothing, but 20 years ago, the house ** was really cheaper.

It doesn't feel like it. Because in this era, people may think that the house at that time was very cheap, but people in that era may not have the financial ability to afford it.

The building next door said that 20 years ago 10,000 yuan could buy a suite, and there was also said that 20 years ago, 10,000 yuan households were equivalent to the middle class, which is simply nonsense Very simple, everyone go back and ask you what year you bought the earliest major appliances in your home, and how much money you bought.

Of course not, 20 years ago, the house was not very valuable, so everyone didn't know whether to buy it or not, and no one started, so now the house prices have risen, and everyone can't afford it.

All I can say is that the house 20 years ago was very cheap compared to the current house price, but it was not for nothing.

20 years ago, the room was cheap because the economy did not develop and did not have the current rapid reconciliation, and then they had their own houses, and the purchase of houses was not just needed

Compared to now, it is equivalent to picking up for nothing, 20 years ago, in terms of prices at that time, houses were still not cheap.

At that time, money was worth a lot! At that time, the monthly salary was only 60 yuan, and a house was 60,000 yuan! There is no harm without contrast.

The first reason.

At present, the policy allows rural collective land to enter the market, so that there is more land, which will inevitably affect the decline of land, and will naturally affect the chain reaction of the decline in housing prices.

Another reason.

It is only a matter of time before the real estate tax is levied in the future, and it will have a big blow to the speculators who own multiple houses in the future.

Third, there is a reason why jujube is rotten.

We only need to savor it carefully and find that some developers are calling loudly that the price of the house will rise in the future, and if you don't buy it now, you will be even more unaffordable, but the real rich people don't have many houses in their hands, but the poorer the people are buying houses, and after finally buying a set, they have not waited to slow down and plan to buy a set for their children, and the natural law that slowly forms is that the poorer the more they buy, the more they sell, the poorer they sell, and finally they are running around for the house in a short life. It's really because most people have such a mentality that it has created the heat of today's property market.

Because in the past, they were all welfare housing, and there was no commercial housing. Later, after the implementation of commercial housing and the cancellation of welfare housing, real estate was regarded as a commodity and had investment attributes. Capital will gather here, and then the house price will be inflated, so that the investors will be able to make a profit more than macro or richer.

In this way, there will be an effect of attracting capital, which will attract more and more capital investment, and a little bit of housing prices will push up.

No, the house is definitely still worth the money, because the house will not depreciate so quickly in such a short period of time.

It depends on the development of society, if the Chinese society is thriving, the house will definitely rise, because there must be more and more coins, if there is war or social instability, the house will definitely not be worth much.

Children born now can almost inherit at least 3 suites in the future, and the population is seriously aging, and the birth rate is decreasing year by year. There must still be a market, but the people will never point to this value-added to make a fortune.

I don't think so, the house is still a very valuable thing so far.

The house is not worth much, bricks and stones. It is artificially made into a gold nugget, and only the Chinese are called the national species. Therefore, if the house price is not extinguished, the world will be destroyed.

Anyway, it's not just a house to buy! The house doesn't go up or down! Calculate the overpayment of the loan! And everyone waits and sees! There are also real estate tycoons who don't sell their houses and don't want to sell their houses! I'm afraid of rushing to sell and change the way to sell.

In the past, home appliances and mobile phones also felt quite expensive, but now they still feel expensive? When it is popularized in every household, it is still valuable when everyone has it, but it will not make people feel unattainable.

Is it worth it to look at the real estate development process of major economies such as Europe, America and Japan, we all know that China's house price to income ratio is 4 6 times that of them, China's house ownership rate is close to 100%, and China's housing vacancy rate is more than 30%.

It will not be worth much, because there are not so many people who speculate on houses, and one child inherits four suites, and there are fewer children, after all, the housing prices are outrageously high

Relatively speaking, it is worthless to be willing to give, this is the law of the market economy, there are ups and downs, and there are ups and downs.

It's hard to say, there are too many uncertainties. You see that this disease has a lot of impact, not to mention the tsunami natural disaster. The most powerful war is a house of millions of people, and it is not the same as the instant ruins.

There are several decades and twenty years in this life, and you should be kind to yourself and your family. If you want to buy a house within your ability, you can buy it, and you can't smash the pot and sell the iron pit, and your parents and family can't do it.

Just like taking the university entrance examination now, almost all dogs and cats can be admitted to the university, but a good university is difficult

This thing definitely won't, the house is worth it no matter what time it is.

It should be relatively worthless, the money depreciates, and the house may not rise, which means that it is becoming less and less valuable.

In the future, as the population decreases, the value of the house will definitely depreciate.

I want to live for myself, not for real estate, I want to live for myself, not for car loans.

Whether the house is worth money depends on what policy the state has, and it is difficult for the state to support it and whether it is worth it or not, but it is impossible for the policy to support it and want to be worth it. All prices, house prices are controlled by the state. No matter how powerful anyone is, it is impossible to be more powerful than the state apparatus, unless you cultivate to become an immortal, hehe.

Excess houses are everywhere and really not worth much later.

It doesn't matter if he's worth anything or not, he lives by himself anyway.

At that time, people didn't see this business opportunity, only a few people saw this business opportunity, so there was no interest in the house, and it didn't change until the last few years.

This may be because although the house was relatively cheap at that time, the economic conditions at that time were not so good, and I didn't know that the house price would be so expensive now.

At that time, people did not realize that houses would be so valuable now, and at that time people could build houses, buildings were not particularly common, and their thinking had not yet changed.

Due to the high reputation of the housing prices of new houses, the most inexpensive old houses have become another choice for many buyers of collapsed houses. But if you are faced with a second-hand house, the age of the house has been more than 20 years, is it still worth buying?