People s Online Review prohibits the comeback of bad Internet celebrities, who are the bad Internet

Simba, there was a very serious fake bird's nest incident at that time, which also made many people particularly annoying in their lives, and now they won't broadcast live.

The bad Internet celebrities in my heart are Simba, Guo Meimei, Er Donkey, and Brother Li, all of which are Internet celebrities with no positive energy.

Simba, Er Donkey, Guo Meimei, Teacher Guo, Brother Li, these people are all bad Internet celebrities, and they have all done some bad things.

People's Online Commentary prohibits the comeback of bad Internet celebrities, and I support People's Daily Online very much. Although the Internet celebrity is not as influential as the TV and movie stars, he is still very influential in his own circle, and even some fans worship the Internet celebrity, no matter what bad things the Internet celebrity does, those fans will not hesitate to follow. Therefore, if the bad Internet celebrity comes back, if he comes, he will still bring a large number of fans.

Therefore, I am very supportive of the initiative of People's Daily Online. For artists and Internet celebrities who have had bad deeds, they are strictly forbidden to make a comeback.

Many people think that only TV and movie stars are socially influential artists. But in fact, the number of fans of many TV and movie stars is less than that of a second-tier Internet celebrity. Moreover, the fans of Internet celebrities pay attention to stickiness, that is, the trust and expectation of Internet celebrities.

This is far more than the level of adoration that fans of TV movie stars have. Therefore, the influence of Internet celebrities on fans is not smaller than that of artists in the entertainment industry, or even greater than that of artists in the entertainment industry.

Many people who have become Internet celebrities have as few as one or two million fans to millions of fans. And the income of many Internet celebrities is that the hunger comes from the tips of fans, and these fans are willing to spend a lot of money on Internet celebrities. Therefore, the Internet celebrity's ability to control their fans is relatively strong, and the impact of the Internet celebrity's bad behavior on the fans is also relatively large, and it is very likely that there are fans for unknown reasons to imitate the self-interested behavior of the Internet celebrity.

Some time ago, there was a luxury car brand, and it invited a bad Internet celebrity to be an endorsement, which caused everyone's dissatisfaction with the sluggish limbs. After this kind of thing happens, many young people feel that it is good to be famous as long as they become famous, regardless of the method used in the process of becoming famous, anyway, these big brands will accept their own celebrity effect. This is exactly the negative impact that bad influencers can have on young people.

I support that the quality of these Internet celebrities, the three views have a particularly serious problem, which will affect the normal order of the Internet and mislead people.

It is very supported by the manuscript shed, and the influence of Internet celebrities is actually quite popular, once there is a problem, it will have a very bad impact on the society, and now there are more and more Internet celebrities, and their words and deeds should be regulated.

Of course I supported it. Because these bad Internet celebrities can't play any positive role at all, and even affect the healthy growth of teenagers.

I don't support it, because their behavior is very excessive and has brought a lot of negative effects on their lives.

I think this is a very positive thing, because these bad influencers can't make a comeback again. So I very much support the statement of People's Daily Online.

I think this matter is very worthy of our praise, because it can be seen that People's Daily Online is very resistant to Internet celebrities, so I admire People's Daily Online very much.

I would like to express my special support. Because these bad online celebrities will not bring us any positive energy at all, these people should not continue to pay, and they should not continue to affect the growth of teenagers.

This is a particularly good thing and a very good rule, and since something bad has been done, it should not happen again.

What is a bad deed? The hat is big and will crush people! Please don't let go of a bad person, and you can't wrong a good person!

There are laws to follow, laws must be followed, and the country is governed according to law, and without investigation, there is no right to speak.

If it is inferior, it must be resisted.

I wonder who will identify bad influencers? Is it legal? If legal, of course yes.

Now that it has been officially recognized as a bad Internet celebrity, of course it supports the boycott? What is this problem? What is the intention?

What kind of network is People's Daily Online?

Is People's Online Review an enterprise? What is a joint-stock company? If it is, it changes people's perceptions.

There is nothing to say, I raise my hands in approval!

I think it is true that the comeback of bad influencers should be completely banned, because influencers like them will not bring a good atmosphere to the Internet.

Should. Because bad influencers can't bring positive energy to society and mislead young people, I think the comeback of bad influencers should be completely banned.

It should be banned, so that it will not affect the development of society, and there will be no other problems, so it must be banned.

Should. Because bad influencers will create a bad image for the public, and will make people follow their example.