Can this constitute a crime, and whether it constitutes a crime

It depends on the nature of the mental blow caused to you by your father-in-law and your mother-in-law, if it seriously affects your image, then you can go to a law firm to find a lawyer to solve it. If it is not serious, it is recommended that you apply for post-trial mediation. "My personal suggestion is to hope for post-court mediation, for reference only" Finally, I have to say that whether your father-in-law and your mother-in-law's behavior can constitute the crime of defamation still needs more detailed information and explanations before you can make a conclusion.

There are still ways to restore your reputation, and after mediation after the trial, if your father-in-law and your mother-in-law are unwilling to apologize publicly, then you can only apply to the court for arbitration. But the original end result is not like that, and it is not good for anyone psychologically in the future. You say yes, right?

I think I've made it clear that the right and responsibility to make decisions is up to you.

It cannot constitute a crime, and the circumstances are not serious enough, but it is possible to request civil compensation and infringe on the right to reputation.

Since they are relatives, they will not be able to sue, not to mention the litigation and ** costs have to be borne. Or make the reason clear with the other party and warn the other party to sue for compensation for reputation damage if this behavior is committed!

Since they are relatives, there is no need to tear their faces!

Since you are innocent, then you let that relative find out the third party and confront each other, isn't it OK? His slander will be self-defeating!

Ask for an apology, eliminate the impact, and compensate for moral damages... The court should be supportive ... The amount can't be very large, it's estimated at around 3000 5000...

A lawsuit without evidence is not easy to fight. Or do more work as parents, it is impossible for people to leave the family in life, her parents are also your parents, understand the contradictions, and use your heart to change her parents' perception of you. Take your time, people's hearts are flesh and blood, no matter what the parents' views are, but the starting point is love for their children.

1. Constituting a crime 2. Intentional homicide 3. Legal basis: Article 232 of the Criminal Law provides that whoever intentionally kills a person shall be sentenced to death, life imprisonment or fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years; where the circumstances are more minor, the sentence is between three and ten years imprisonment. 4：

Analysis, in this case: Subject: Liu X is an adult who is at least 18 years old, mentally normal, and is a person with full capacity for criminal responsibility, and the subject is qualified.

Object: the right to life. Objective:

As a result, three of the families of Jia and Wang were poisoned and died. Subjective: As a rational person, knowing that someone will steal vegetables to eat, it will cause the consequences of poisoning and death, and allowing this result to happen is indirect intentional homicide.

To sum up: subjective, objective, subject, and object all meet the criminal composition of the crime of intentional homicide, so it is found to be the crime of intentional homicide (indirect intentional).