Why do we insist on China s income distribution system, and why will the income distribution gap wid

Individual income disparities due to institutional factors.

First, the unequal opportunities for competition have led to a widening of the income gap. Relying on the favorable advantages or privileges they occupied in the era of the planned economy, some individuals or groups took the lead in the opening up and invigorating of the market economy, completed the accumulation of primitive capital in a very short period of time, amassed a large amount of wealth, and became nouveau riche. Second, the existence of "income generation" in various regions, departments, and units has caused the income gap to widen.

In the more than 20 years since reform and opening up, along with the decentralization of power and the establishment of a market economic system, various localities, departments, and units have basically adopted a tolerant and tacitly acquiesced attitude toward the phenomenon of "generating income" on their own, with the result that some units have grabbed as much income as possible through various legal and illegal means, or even "playing on the sidelines," and distributed a part of the income obtained to their workers. If it is a first-class department, it is an abuse of power, apportionment to the objects of its management or service, fund-raising, or arbitrary fees and fines. The income thus obtained has of course become the basis of financial resources for the payment of bonuses and benefits to its employees.

As a result, along with the competition of various units around seizing the commanding heights of income distribution, the income distribution gap between employees of different units has been formed and widened. Third, the monopoly operation of the industry has caused the income gap to widen. Until now, some industries such as electric power, telecommunications, tobacco, finance and insurance, civil aviation, and railways have not yet been granted market access.

Industries operating in monopoly areas have distributed a part of the monopoly rents to their workers in various forms while vigorously maintaining their monopoly management status, which is not conducive to the improvement of the service quality and operational efficiency of the industries, but has also contributed to the widening of the income gap between people in different industries. Fourth, local protection and regional lockdowns have led to a widening of income disparities. Local protection and regional blockade are not only incompatible with the requirements for the establishment of a unified market, but also violate the operating rules of the market economy itself, and to a certain extent, widen the income gap between people in different regions.

Inequality of personal income due to illegality.

There are three main reasons for the illegality of the widening income gap in China: the first is the "gray economy", which mainly refers to the individual economy that has not been registered with industry and commerce and evades paying taxes, such as small traders and hawkers without business licenses, home decoration, private buildings, etc.; The second is the "black economy", which mainly refers to the criminal economy that resists law and taxes, including smuggling, drug trafficking, money laundering, counterfeiting, pornography, human trafficking, abduction, etc.; The third type is the "corrupt economy", which mainly refers to the abuse of power for personal gain and the trading of power for money. The high income brought about by illegal business operations and rent-seeking activities will seriously dampen the production enthusiasm of legitimate business operators, undermine people's concept of law-abiding management, and induce more people to engage in illegal business activities or increase personal income through rent-seeking activities such as pulling connections, going through the back door, dredging, and bribery, which not only hinders the establishment of a new order of market economy, but also aggravates the unfairness of income distribution.

One is that the system itself is unreasonable, and the other is that the implementation is not in place.

Legal Analysis:1With distribution according to work as the main body, a variety of distribution methods coexist2

A combination of distribution according to work and distribution according to factors of production3Encourage some people to get rich first through honest work and legal management, and ultimately achieve common prosperity, efficiency first, and fairness4Regulate income distribution, overcome egalitarianism, and prevent polarization.

Legal basis: Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035 Adhere to the basic synchronization of the growth of residents' income and economic growth, the increase of labor remuneration and the improvement of labor productivity, continue to increase the income of low-income groups, expand the middle-income group, and promote common prosperity more actively and promisingly.

Hello, dear, here for you to find out that China's current distribution system is a distribution system with distribution according to work as the main body and multiple distribution methods coexisting. the ownership structure of the means of production in the primary stage of socialism in China; the level of development of the productive forces in the initial stage of socialism; The existence of differences in people's labor in a socialist society determines the distribution structure in China at the present stage. At the same time, it is also an objective requirement for the development of the socialist market economy.

The dominant position of distribution according to work is manifested in the following aspects: First, in the income distribution of the whole society, distribution according to work accounts for the largest proportion and plays a major role; Second, among the total income of workers within the scope of the public economy, income distributed according to work is the most important income**. Under the conditions of the socialist market economy, distribution according to work has the following characteristics:

In addition to distribution according to work, other distribution methods mainly include distribution according to business results; It is distributed according to other factors of production such as labor, capital, technology, land, etc. Distribution according to work is different from distribution according to the factors of labor, and distribution according to work can only be distributed within the scope of socialist public ownership. Extended Content:

The implementation of a distribution system in the initial stage of socialism, with distribution according to work as the mainstay and the coexistence of various distribution methods, is determined by China's social and economic conditions. (1) The mode of production determines the mode of distribution, and the ownership structure of the means of production determines the distribution structure. The ownership structure with public ownership as the mainstay and the long-term common development of the economy under various forms of ownership determines the distribution structure in which distribution according to work is the mainstay and various forms of distribution coexist at the same time.

2) The diversification of the forms of public ownership also determines the diversification of the forms of distribution. As a result of the implementation of the shareholding system, the joint-stock cooperative system, the cooperative system, the contract management system, and other forms of realization, it is inevitable that various kinds of distribution income other than distribution according to work will be generated. (3) The intrinsic requirements of the socialist market economic system.

To develop the socialist market economy, it is necessary to follow the laws of the market economy, and all kinds of factors of production (labor, land, capital, and management) must have corresponding market evaluations, and the owners of these factors of production should receive corresponding incomes. In addition, there is a need for risk income in a market economy, as well as income through social security, and so on. In short, the coexistence of various modes of distribution in the initial stage of socialism is the result of the joint action of many factors, such as the economy under various forms of ownership, the modes of operation of various modes of operation, and the internal mechanism of the operation of the market economy.

The establishment and improvement of the national income readjustment system is an important means of adjusting income distribution.

It is necessary to proceed from the goal of the overall interests of society and the goal of stable and coordinated development of the social economy, and safeguard the necessary fairness in society. The most important thing is to improve the social security system, and at the same time adjust the gap in social income distribution through taxation, transfer payments, and other means.

In China's current tax system, the most important tax designed to regulate the distribution of residents' income should be individual income tax. According to the regulations, the income obtained by individuals residing in China (including overseas income for more than one year) shall be subject to individual income tax in accordance with the law, and different excess progressive tax rates shall be implemented for income from wages and salaries, production and operation income, etc.

Legal Analysis: Implementing a system in which distribution according to work is the mainstay and various forms of distribution coexist, and the distribution according to work and distribution according to the factors of production are quietly balanced, can arouse the enthusiasm of all quarters, promote the improvement of economic efficiency, and promote the development of productive forces.

Individual income distribution refers to the economic activities in which members of society participate in the distribution of national income. The distribution of personal income has a direct impact on employment, investment, consumption, savings, prices, and other issues. The level of individual income and the change in structure have a significant impact on the improvement of workers' enthusiasm, economic growth, and overall social progress.

Allocation principle. 1. The principle of distribution according to work as the main body and the coexistence of multiple distribution methods.

2. The principle of giving priority to efficiency and taking into account fairness.

3. The principle of allowing and encouraging some people to get rich first and eventually achieve common prosperity.

Legal basis: Article 509 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China To apply for participation in the distribution, the applicant shall submit an application. The application shall clearly state the facts and reasons for the inability of the person participating in the distribution and the person subject to enforcement to pay off all creditor's rights, and shall be accompanied by a basis for enforcement.

The application for participation in the distribution shall be submitted after the commencement of the enforcement procedure and before the end of the enforcement of the property of the person subject to enforcement.

At the present stage, the structure of individual income distribution in China is as follows: a variety of distribution methods coexist, distribution according to work is the main body, and factors of production also participate in distribution.

There are not only distribution according to work and non-distribution according to work, but also in terms of non-work distribution, there are labor income and unearned income, and some management labor and its business income; The income of the second occupation of certain public employees.

In terms of unearned income, it mainly refers to various asset income, such as interest, dividends, rent, etc.; Certain operating income, including market opportunity income, risk income, gift (gift) income, and residual value income.

China's ownership structure at the present stage includes not only the state-owned and collective economy itself, but also all the public economic components of the mixed economy. The main body is not only reflected in the quantitative advantage, but also in the quality; The dominant position and control of public ownership in the development of the national economy is reflected in whether or not the state-owned economy has mastered the lifeline of the national economy.

In short, at the present stage, the acquisition of personal income is multifaceted, and the coexistence of various forms of personal income in China at the present stage is an inevitable requirement of the pluralistic ownership structure and the development of the market economy.

Significance

Since the reform and opening up, China's distribution theory and distribution mode have undergone an evolutionary process from a single distribution according to work, to distribution according to work, supplemented by other distribution methods, and then to the combination of distribution according to work and distribution according to factors.

Widening income disparities have positive implications, but excessively large income disparities can lead to polarization and affect social stability. At present, China regards the formation of a rational and orderly income distribution pattern as one of the goals of building a harmonious socialist society, and rationally adjusts the distribution relations and distribution pattern of the whole society through effective macroeconomic regulation and control, so as to narrow the income gap.

China's income distribution system should be based on distribution according to work.

1. Public ownership of the means of production is the premise for the practice of distribution according to work, the level of development of the productive forces is the material basis for the practice of distribution according to work, and the nature and characteristics of people's labor under socialist conditions are the direct cause of the implementation of distribution according to work.

2. From the perspective of practical significance, how to mobilize the enthusiasm of laborers, motivate laborers to study science and technology hard, improve labor skills, and thus promote the development of socialist productive forces reflects the social status of laborers working together and distributing equally.

3. The current income distribution system places more emphasis on increasing the proportion of residents' income, especially labor remuneration, and for low-income workers, it creates conditions for more people to have property income by increasing poverty alleviation efforts and the minimum wage guarantee mechanism.

4. Create equal opportunities by protecting legitimate income, regulating excessively high incomes, and banning illegal income, and gradually reverse the trend of widening the gap in income distribution.

Enlightenment of the French income sharing system to China:

1. The management of wages should be strengthened.

1. France implements classified management of the wages of members of the whole society, while for the private sector, France does not directly intervene, and has formulated the minimum wage and industry minimum wage level while ensuring the space for negotiation between labor and management, and its wage determination mechanism is relatively flexible.

2. For the wages of the public sector, strict hierarchical restrictions have been made, and reasonable growth has been maintained appropriately, so that the public sector can attract and retain talents and maintain the competitiveness of enterprises.

Second, China should give greater play to the regulatory role of taxation.

Due to the imperfection of China's taxation environment, the unreasonable tax system and the lack of tax awareness of some residents, China's individual income tax system has not yet played its due role in regulating the personal income gap.