An open book and helpful argument can leave the other party speechless to say!

Are you positive, or negative.

1. It is better to travel thousands of miles than to read 10,000 books, and it is easy to cause talk on paper and lack of practicality and feasibility.

2. There are many kinds of books, which can be said to be too many, so it often takes a lot of time when reading these books, and it may even take a long time to still not find what you want, wasting time and energy.

3. There are all kinds of books on the market, only healthy and upward volumes are beneficial, and those that are unhealthy are harmless. If you indulge in it, it is not beneficial to people's body and mind.

4. Volumes refer to books, but in fact, network resources are more beneficial than books, not only sufficient resources but also easy to find, you can find what you need more accurately with the least time, save trouble, effort and place, and are more environmentally friendly.

In addition, they may say that children do not have the ability to choose, so you have to say that parents have the responsibility to help children make choices.

If there is no loophole, you will "stab him" and embarrass them, and he may say some analogy, famous quotes, or something, and directly refute them with the information he has searched and his own words.

Is it good to read comic books?

Legitimate weakness is unhealthy books.

Archaeological excavations, housing prices too fast, will be too separated, the national Haihong holding café and ** very high fermentation tank points will be standardized, coffee good marriage, rebellion plan non-public.

The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said: "As long as you read, there will always be benefits."".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

As for"Unbook is not necessarily beneficial", is a neutral word, half of it is (beneficial) is true, but the other half - unhelpful - unhelpful is problematic: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it doesn't fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is burrowing into the ground?

Suppose the argument is"Open book is harmful", then according to some of the arguments just now, it is natural that it can also be established, but to say"Unhelpful"That's wrong. So, on this issue, the argument of the opposing side is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument)

Since the pro-side forum is certain to be true, and the argument of the opposing side is only half true, then what else.

There are three ways to read, which is to the heart, the eyes, and the mouth - Zhu Xi.

I think it's beneficial to open the book. Gorky said, "Books are the ladder of human progress."

Read more and you will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspired by them, and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.

The world's famous Bacon once said: "History makes people wise, poetry makes people wise, mathematics makes people fine, naturalism makes people profound, and ethics makes people dignified." These many meanings can be summed up in one word: opening the book is beneficial. If we don't read more, where will it come from?

What about so much knowledge? If we don't have knowledge, how can we discern who is right from wrong?

Books are the summary of historical experience, and books are the crystallization of social culture. Reading can lead to a thorough understanding of the truth of life; Reading can give insight into the vicissitudes of the world; Reading can help people all over the world. If we don't read much, where will we get the rich words to write essays?

Marx opened the book and benefited a lot. When he wrote Capital, he read more than 1,000 volumes of books from his own collection, and he also went to the British Museum to see books from three houses. If Marx hadn't opened the book, he might not have been able to write Capital.

Wen Ye, a sophomore student at Hangzhou No. 4 High School, has been reading books since he was a child. Not only has a wide range of knowledge, but also excellent in arts and sciences, he has also published more than 30 articles in many newspapers and periodicals, and won five awards for essays. Isn't it enough for a 17-year-old student to have such an achievement to show that "open books are beneficial"?

If people want to become talents, and if they want to help the world, they must open the book and read.

We read a lot, and when we see books that are not healthy for our body and mind, we can identify them as soon as we read them, and we will not read them again and buy them again.

Read more than 10,000 volumes, and write like a god. Another example is "Read 10,000 books, travel 10,000 miles." "Reading is good. I hope you will act quickly!

Open books aren't necessarily beneficial, because reading comics and stuff is not only bad for our writing, but it's also bad for our brains. So I don't think it's necessarily beneficial to open the book.

Although books are medicine, if you don't have the right symptoms, it may cure the dead!!