Debate essay on whether an open book is beneficial or unhelpful

It's useless.

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

As for"Unbook is not necessarily beneficial", is a neutral word, half of it is (beneficial) is true, but the other half - unhelpful - unhelpful is problematic: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it doesn't fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is burrowing into the ground?

Suppose the argument is"Open book is harmful", then according to some of the arguments just now, it is natural that it can also be established, but to say"Unhelpful"That's wrong. So, on this issue, the argument of the opposing side is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument)

Since the pro-side argument is certain to be valid, and the argument of the opposing side is only half valid, what is the reason for arguing? It is obviously invincible!

Although it is an idiom that opening the book is beneficial, I insist that if the book is opened blindly, it may not be beneficial.

People who can read all kinds of books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Gorky once said: "The more I read, the brighter and more meaningful it becomes for me to get closer to the world and life." "Gorky, for example, started out as a little boy in a shop.

If he didn't read and seek knowledge, he wouldn't have profound knowledge and superb writing, and how could he feel that "life has become brighter and more meaningful for me".

Cook well hahahaha.

When class started, we happily walked into the classroom. Because today there is a reading debate in this class.

The debate began, and first the teacher announced the requirements of the debate: "Now I announce the start of the reading debate of the 52nd class!" The positive side is composed of Chen Moru and Si Xinyi, and the opposing side is composed of Xu Ruonan and Zhang Haosu.

The requirement is that the debaters on both sides should express their opinions around their own views, and the debaters on both sides should respect each other, convince others with reason, and avoid being arrogant and unreasonable. The positive view is that open books are beneficial, and the negative view is that open books are not necessarily beneficial. Okay, now the debaters on both sides start arguing.

Chen Moru was the first to express his opinion: "We believe that opening the book will be beneficial. If you think about it, you can gain new knowledge and gain something new from the book every time. And from ancient times to the present, haven't all celebrities read a lot of books? ”

Xu Ruonan heard this, and immediately counterattacked: "We think that opening the book may not be beneficial, and what the other party said just now is not comprehensive." Because some of the unhealthy books sold on the bookstalls will be bought by some teenagers, poisoning their minds, making them go down the road of crime and lawlessness, and making them fall deeper and deeper into the quagmire.

Si Xinyi expressed his opinions loudly: "What the other party said is good, but what we are talking about is opening a health volume, reading good books, and accompanying good books, just like walking with a close friend, and benefiting immensely." ”

As one of the representatives of the opposing side, I listened to his speech and immediately ridiculed him: "What the other party just said is not unreasonable, but the resistance of some teenagers is really too poor. Moreover, 'opening the book is beneficial' is what the ancients said, and at that time, people read the classics of various schools, so at that time the ancients would say 'open the book is beneficial'.

The tense atmosphere was broken, and the two sides argued with each other, and I argued word by word......

In the end, it was the teacher who ended, and she said: "Now the '52 Class Reading Debate' is over." I have summed it up, that is, we must remember that opening the book is beneficial, we must open the 'benefit book' to take its essence, on this basis, read diligently, open our horizons, use our brains, improve our moral sentiment and appreciation, draw nourishment from the book, and benefit for life.

As soon as the words ended, the class immediately burst into warm applause. Our class's reading debate ended with this warm applause.

In today's team activity, our class held a unique debate on whether it is beneficial to open the book.

The debate begins! With Mr. Luo's order, the debate competition kicked off.

As the saying goes, open books are beneficial, which means that reading books benefits people. Gorky once said, "Books are the ladder of human progress."

If a person does not read, then his knowledge will slowly dry up; On the contrary, if a person reads tirelessly, his knowledge will flow into his brain like a faucet. We believe that open books are beneficial! "On behalf of the positive side, I have made my point clear with a super momentum.

The opposing Wang Kaidi retorted: "Some comic books are not beneficial at all, and they are a waste of time. Our Brilliance responded without hesitation

Eating red dates hurts your teeth, and eating pears hurts your spleen and stomach. You don't stop eating these things just because they hurt a part, right? The opposite Hua Qiongyue threw out another point:

Reading those harmful books makes one's mind worse. I retorted, "Just because you're talking about a bad book doesn't mean it's not good at all.

You can learn a few ways to write, a few words, or even a few words from these bad books, and these are all beneficial, how can you say that it is not beneficial? The other party was dumbfounded, speechless. After a while, the opposing Shangguan Zhou Yi said

Extracurricular books are like sesame seeds, and in-class books are like watermelons, we can't lose watermelons and pick up sesame seeds! I immediately responded: "Most of our knowledge is in extracurricular books, and this 'sesame' is very important to us!"

In the end, each side sent a representative to summarize their views. We expressed our opinions and won warm applause from our classmates.

I think it's good to open the book because it can develop our wisdom and it can also broaden our horizons.

What about the people who came back when the eldest sisters and daughters-in-law came back, this said, hello, the pixel recipe is twists and turns.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened. Useful arguments for opening the book.

A philosopher once said that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, true scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when they read books, they just flip through the pages casually, some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude.

The idiom "open book is beneficial" naturally has its positive meaning as an emphasis on the importance of reading, but it is inappropriate to use it as an assertion that "open book" is "beneficial".

It is often said, "It is good to open a book, but it is good to read a book." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely true. If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial.

Now they may like to watch martial arts, romance only **, books and periodicals, sometimes to the extent of forgetting to sleep and eating, and not letting go of the book, once they are lost in books, they will go crazy, then they only think about books in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some of the plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go down the path of crime. Isn't this a harm to yourself by reading books?

This is just the first layer included in "unbook is not necessarily beneficial": unbook is not necessarily beneficial. There is also a second floor.

The second is that we have to be selective when we read books. Don't read books that aren't healthy and don't help us much. If we want to read books, we should read some books that are good for us, and only by reading good books will we not ruin ourselves.

Some people compare books to friends, reading good books, that is, making good friends, will progress; If you don't read a good book, of course, you will make friends with people who can't make friends, and then you will regress. Because those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black! So, only good books will be good for you.

Therefore, my point is that open books are not necessarily beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can choose to read.

And don't ruin your life by reading the wrong book, leading yourself astray.

What's more, there are countless quotes about the benefits of reading. Let's talk about it, so many celebrities and great people summarize that if we don't read much, where will we get the rich words to write essays? Marx opened the book and benefited a lot. He wrote.

Well, sorry ha. I'm on a mission.

Reading more books can enrich our knowledge and help us a lot in future writingGorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." "If you read more, you will increase your knowledge.

Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspired by them, and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.

If we don't read much, where will we get so much knowledge? If we don't have knowledge, how can we discern who is right from wrong?

What's more, there are countless quotes about the benefits of reading. Let's talk about it, can't the experience summed up by so many celebrities and great men fully show that "opening the book is beneficial"?