There is news that Starbucks was forced to pay 10.87 million, what negative impact has this incident

It will definitely affect the sales of Starbucks, cause economic losses, and also affect the consumption of the brand, which is not conducive to the development of the brand, and there will be negative news and a lot of bad information.

This incident has had a very serious negative impact on the brand, and it has also affected the brand's word-of-mouth and reputation. It also led to a decline in profits. It has also led to many consumers being disappointed with this brand. It has also led to a significant reduction in the brand's image.

This incident has brought a lot of negative effects to the brand, resulting in the brand being complained by many consumers, affecting sales, affecting economic profits, affecting turnover, and also affecting the reputation and honor of this brand.

It has affected the reputation of Starbucks, the development of Starbucks, the sales volume of Starbucks, the operation of Starbucks, and people's attention to Starbucks.

Introduction: If anyone has a cup of Starbucks in their hands, it must be a senior white-collar worker, at least the consumption level is not low, Starbucks is used as a high-end beverage in China. But I didn't expect Starbucks to be forced to pay more than 10.87 million yuan, so what is wrong with this company?

Starbucks rented a storefront house in Guangdong, and the location of this house was relatively good, but what I didn't expect was that the house was built and rented from a third-hand landlord. In the process of rent transmission, one of them did not pay the rent, so the person responsible for the house did not receive the corresponding rent, and Starbucks fell into such a lease contract dispute, so it was enforced. However, in terms of the essence of the incident, this incident itself was caused by the problems of Starbucks in leasing as early as the number of times, and the amount of funds of Starbucks itself is very large, so there is no problem in enforcing so much money, and it cannot touch the fundamental interests of the company.

What consumers are most concerned about is whether they usually get this drink, whether it is healthy to drink it, and whether there will be any physical problems. Starbucks' drinks** are very high, and it is understandable that the ingredients used in such a high-end drink are fresh. However, Starbucks has a phenomenon of using expired ingredients to make drinks, Starbucks uses expired peach pulp to make drinks, so that consumers feel very disgusted, after all, the fruit has been cut, and it will definitely taste after being left for so long.

Therefore, these problems should be corrected in a timely manner and the relevant fines should be dealt with.

In fact, in the process of paying attention to the development of this company, people should also understand that this is a foreign company. Therefore, when choosing this company, consumers should also think about why they can't support state-owned brands or drink boiled water directly at home. Except for high-level white-collar workers, it is difficult for consumers to consume Starbucks drinks at the same level.

Annihilation.

Because of the safety problems of Starbucks' food, and secondly, because of some problems in the lease contract, the virtual calendar will lead to such a situation, which also has the impact of strict reputation and cultivation on Starbucks.

The business was found to have made products from expired raw materials, and the expired food was not discarded in time and taken out the next day to continue selling.

It is because the lease contract is enforced, and there are some disputes in this contract, and it will be forced by the court.

According to official information, Starbucks Coffee Company was founded in 1971 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. It is a professional coffee roaster and retailer. In January 1999, Starbucks opened its first store in Chinese mainland at the Beijing International Trade Center, officially entering the Chinese market and returning to China.

The Chinese market is currently Starbucks' second-largest consumer market after the United States. According to the financial report, Starbucks' consolidated net income in the fourth quarter was $8.1 billion, a year-on-year increase of 31%; Net profit was 100 million US dollars, a year-on-year increase; GAAP earnings per share were in US dollars. Fiscal 2021 full-year consolidated net income was $100 million, up year-over-year; net profit was US$4.2 billion, a year-on-year increase; GAAP earnings per share were in US dollars.

According to Starbucks' financial report, in fiscal year 2021, Starbucks Oak China's total revenue for the entire fiscal year was 100 million US dollars (equivalent to RMB 100 million), compared with a year-on-year increase of 100 million US dollars (equivalent to RMB 16.3 billion) in the same period last year. Some Starbucks stores follow the "unspoken rules" of food safety driven by profit and regulation. Not only do they use expired ingredients, but they also falsify their shelf life, and there are problems with hygiene.

For example, even if the chocolate liquid with a shelf life of only two days has expired, the clerk does not replace it, but continues to make drinks for customers to drink. In addition, ingredients such as matcha powder and peach pulp will continue to be used after the expiration date. <>

The clerk also said that if the raw materials are not used, even if the store's money is discarded, it will be discarded. Profit must be taken into account. In order to prevent inspection, the clerk will simply remove the expiration date label.

During the unannounced visit, expired black tea liquid, creams, etc. were torn off the expiration date labels. At the same time, for the ingredients that are close to the expiration date, the clerk will also tamper with the warranty label, saying, "This is how the master and apprentice are brought, it doesn't matter."

In the dark store, the overnight cake will not be thrown away, but secretly ** put it on the shelves. <>

Because Starbucks was disputed over the lease contract, it will be enforced.

The reason behind this is that Starbucks has a number of stores that have been found to have evaded taxes, so they were forced to pay 10.87 million by repentance.

Because in this case, Starbucks was not the main debtor, and the repayment subject was another company. The whole incident is completely false when summed up, the Bank of Guangzhou rented the house to the second landlord, the second landlord rented to the third landlord, and Starbucks rented the house from the third landlord. As a result, the second landlord could no longer pay the rent, and the third landlord did not pay the rent, so the Bank of Guangzhou demanded to terminate the contract.

Therefore, it is not Starbucks that is in arrears of rent, Starbucks is currently only obligated to assist in the return of the premises.

This also reflects that Starbucks has big problems in quality control and service. I hope that I can do a good job of self-examination and self-correction in the future.

The reason is that Starbucks' lease contract dispute, which failed to fulfill its contractual obligations, was enforced.

Introduction: Starbucks is a very famous beverage brand, and it is a foreign brand, many young people like to drink Starbucks, Starbucks has branches all over the country. It stands to reason that Starbucks' operation should be good, but I didn't expect Starbucks to be forced to pay 10.87 million, what do you think of this matter?

Starbucks has opened more stores all over the country, and most of the other stores in Starbucks are relatively high-end. At the same time, the location is also very good, so the rent is very cheap. The house rented by a branch of Starbucks in Guangzhou was rented from the third landlord, and because the second landlord rented it to the third landlord, a relatively long rent chain was formed in such a situation.

At such a time, Starbucks rented the house of the third landlord, and the second landlord did not pay the rent in time, and at this time, the original tenant of the house felt that it was not suitable, and there was a dispute over the lease contract. Starbucks has become the person subject to execution, but there are still a lot of incidents involved, so in this matter, it can only be said that Xingsong changed branches and Buck did not find a good house, so there will be such a dispute.

A company as large as Starbucks has encountered problems in renting a house, which shows that it must not be taken lightly when it comes to renting a house. And if it is an ordinary young man who rents a house, it is best to choose to rent the house that is rented directly from the owner, rather than renting a house from the second landlord. Because these second-hand landlords don't care about the house and just want to make money, they will raise the rent relatively high.

And it will create a lot of partitions, which are very poor living experience.

In fact, this incident does not affect the quality of Starbucks, and it is considered a problem in operation. But Starbucks is a very big company, and so much money can be taken out, so there is no problem. Sometimes people still have to distinguish the cause of the incident to make a judgment, if you usually like to drink Starbucks, then you can continue to drink.

The negative impact of Starbucks' enforcement on Starbucks is very large, and it will also affect Starbucks' reputation. Starbucks' approach has also disrupted the market, and Starbucks should be punished more severely. Bucket fiber.

I think that Xingzhijibach's stuffy socks behavior is very incorrect, and it also violates the rules and regulations of the market, and the impact of this behavior on society is also very bad, so you need to pay the corresponding responsibility, and you must take it as a stop.

said that Starbucks' behavior has been violated, and it also shows that people are very dissatisfied with Starbucks, so Starbucks will be enforced.

The reason behind Chong Limb is that there is a dispute over the lease contract of Starbucks, and a Starbucks in Guangdong owes a lot of rent, and it has not been repaid, so it will be enforced.

Because this company is mired in a contract dispute. This incident was rather bad and affected their image.

The reason behind it is a dispute over a lease contract, which has now been enforced, and it is 10.87 million yuan.

Introduction: Starbucks, as an American coffee company, has opened many branches in China, and recently Guangdong Starbucks was forced to pay 10.87 million, so what is the reason for Starbucks to be enforced? <>

What does it mean to be enforced in a tour?

According to the public display of China Information Network, Guangdong Starbucks Company recently added a new news of the person subject to execution. and was forced to impose a fine of 10.87 million. The enforcement of Guangdong Starbucks means that the company has not fulfilled the court enforcement letter on time, and there is a problem of integrity.

A company that is not even willing to enforce the court judgment will have great integrity risks and legal risks in cooperation with the company. Starbucks' failure to enforce the court's judgment may also mean that the company is short of capital and may have debt disputes. Since Starbucks is included in the list of persons subject to execution, even if there is a shortage of funds, the bank will not give loans and shipments, and will not give preferential policies.

Regardless of the reason for being sued, it is recommended not to respond passively to avoid being included in the list of persons subject to enforcement after losing the lawsuit, which will affect the reputation of the enterprise and cause greater losses. <>

2. What is the reason for being enforced by the company?

Starbucks Coffee Company was founded in 1971 and is headquartered in Seattle, USA, and the Chinese market is currently Starbucks' largest consumer market after the United States. But some Starbucks stores are driven by profits and implement some unspoken rules. Starbucks stores not only use expired ingredients, but also tamper with the expiration date of ingredients, even if the ingredients used to make coffee have expired, Starbucks staff still use expired ingredients to make coffee.

Regarding the incident of using expired ingredients to make coffee, Starbucks staff said that expired ingredients would also be discarded if they were not used. In order to consider profits and prevent inspections, the store staff will tear off the expiration date, and for the ingredients that are close to the expiration date, the store staff will tamper with the expiration date. <>

3. Impact on Starbucks.

Starbucks' actions this time were not only included in the list of persons to be executed by Chinese courts, but also boycotted by the majority of Chinese people. Starbucks uses expired raw materials to make coffee, and Starbucks grinds Liangrun in order to obtain greater profits. And using expired raw materials for customers will not only lose a large number of customers.

It can also cause reputational damage to the company. It will also lose the Chinese consumer market, which can be said to be more than worth the loss.

Because of the problem of a lease contract dispute with this brand, it was finally forced to answer 10.87 million yuan, and there was a lot of negative information about the manuscript before, such as making Jingchai use expired products.

Because they have some lease contract disputes, the impact of these disputes is relatively large, so they have such a penalty.

The reason for the enforcement is that Starbucks was enforced because of the housing lease, and it should have owed a lot of rent.

In this brand, it was previously revealed that he used stale ingredients, and there were also some problems in operation, so he was enforced. However, this matter is not confirmed, and the authenticity of the remaining liquid is determined.

Because Starbucks was involved in a lease case, it seemed to involve a dispute over the lease contract, so it was enforced.

If it is caused by the reason of the lease contract, the judgment will definitely be enforced.

Introduction: Starbucks is a well-known chain of drinks, the company mainly sells coffee products, and some desserts, usually Starbucks is opened in places where white-collar workers work, so the consumption in Starbucks is still relatively high-end. Starbucks was forced to pay 10.87 million for rent arrears, what is the company's current situation?

Starbucks had an accident this time in a Starbucks branch in Guangzhou, and it turned out that in the process of renting a house, Starbucks rented a house with a third-hand landlord, so there are more relationships involved. However, there were people in the middle who did not pay the rent, so Starbucks was also enforced, but with Starbucks' financial resources, 10.87 million is completely affordable, so the company's operation is normal. However, in addition to the rent problem, people are most worried about the quality of Starbucks' drinks, after all, Starbucks used to use expired ingredients to make drinks, and they were all expired fruits, so Jing Kuan said that the harm is still very great.

It is also hoped that Starbucks can make timely rectifications and pay the actual amount of the court's ruling.

Companies like Starbucks should logically use very good ingredients, and WeChat Starbucks' drinks are very expensive, and a bottle of drink for the first time costs more than 30 yuan, which is beyond the consumption level of most people. But even then, Starbucks will have the problem of using expired ingredients, so Starbucks is not a beverage company that can be completely trusted. Therefore, in daily life, people can drink boiled water if they can drink it, and if they want to drink something, they can make it themselves, which is more convenient and fast.

Through this incident, it can be seen that companies like Starbucks will inevitably have some negative news. As an ordinary consumer, the most important thing to pay attention to is the quality of the goods, as for these contract disputes, in fact, the company can handle them very well. Therefore, we should pay attention to whether Starbucks can provide users with safe drinks, so that users can better speak.