English Grammar Transformation and Judgment? Some judgments and distinctions about English grammar

Of course, it can be converted. Give out two sentences. The second sentence is correct, and the following definite clause is placed after the comma as a non-restrictive definition. The first sentence needs to replace the comma with the coordinating conjunction and.

Cannot be converted, they can be pronouns, while whom is biased towards guiding clauses, and the accusative form of who appears as a component in the sentence.

This ** is very complete.

Listen carefully in class, take notes, memorize all the knowledge points that you tell honestly, memorize every word, and match the number of English and Chinese. Memorize the teacher's key sentences, read more English readings, and memorize some extracurricular words. That's probably all there is to it.

Grammar is just one word "remember"! Seriously, English is not difficult, as long as you put in the effort at the beginning of learning, it is not difficult to learn well. If you work hard, you will definitely be able to learn well.

Buy a reliable grammar book, do plenty of exercises, and read English magazines.

A complete sentence in English grammar can only have one predicate verb, and this sentence appears with two predicate verbs, one is get and one is is, so it is wrong.

It can be found in it's is preceded by and to connect the two sentences;

You can also change the comma to a full stop and put it'S is capitalized, for it's ……

It can also be used as an it's is changed to which is, so that the following sentence is changed to a non-restrictive definite clause, and the whole sentence has only one main clause, which is also true.

two hundred people go to school by bus. it's the best way to go to school.

Or two hundred people go to school by bus, which is the best way to go to school

Get to isn't technically a bug, but it's not authentic enough.

The comma in the middle must be wrong, and it should be a full stop or a clause.

The comma should be changed into the conjunction and

So that everything else is fine.

it'Replace the s with which is

Non-restrictive definite clauses.

Every English sentence includes vocabulary and grammar, grammar knowledge points include lexical and syntax, there are ten categories in lexicography, and syntax includes tense, voice, sentence pattern and other knowledge points, you can't judge endlessly. Suggestion: When you encounter a sentence that you can't read or is more special, analyze the grammar points, turn the grammar book or go to some English forums, soso to ask for help from people who understand.

Good luck with your studies!

The sentence components are actually reflected in the language, and I only found out later, the English teacher said the expression in class, and the sentence is not understood. For example, Xiao Ming is a person, and it is generally followed by a connecting verb such as be, and the predicate after be is played by an adjective. In other words, if you have clarified the language aspect, the sentence composition should be about the same.

It's actually so simple. The predicate is after the verb, the object is after the verb and the preposition, the predicate is the verb in the sentence, the complement is the supplementary description, the adverbial is generally separated by a comma, and you can use Chinese grammar to learn English grammar, figure it out.

If you want to study on your own, buy an English grammar book and review topics such as articles, nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs, tenses, clauses, etc., and do supporting exercises.

No. being pretected by ……The qualifier of the latter clause is areas and does not constitute an error

Grammatically it's not a big problem, but the overall feeling isn't too good.

It is suggested that after the sentence mentions cultures, add and is protected after the comma...