Is it possible for a genetic mutation to create a new species? Is it a good thing or a bad thing?

Updated on science 2024-08-10
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    Genetic mutations may also create new species, which some people think is a good thing and some people think it's a bad thing. Because we don't know how this new species is developing, and we don't know whether such a species has a certain impact on human society.

    If you are interested in related issues, you can also go to the Internet to check the information, but at present, science has a certain amount of research, if there is really a genetic mutation, then the gene mutation may produce some new species, but we don't know whether such species are good or bad, that is to say, the species that exist under the gene mutation may have certain benefits for human society, but the negative impact must be great. Because such a species has never appeared, we don't know if there is some variability in such a species.

    I think this may be a good thing, because we have never seen such a new species before, but everyone also knows that this is a species that exists under genetic mutations, so it may have a relatively large impact on humans. Because we have not studied such species before, it may lead to some problems that we are also prone to, so it is not recommended that you study the species under genetic mutations, because we don't know what kind of changes will exist in these species before, and we don't know what kind of changes will exist in these species later, so it may also have some bad impact on our lives.

    However, this unknown creature will exist one day, so I don't think you need to be overly nervous. And many scientists have already put forward some assertions, and these new species may really be prone to appear in the future, so we must also look at it with an inclusive attitude, but we must also be mentally prepared.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    Genetic mutations may create new species. But this is not a good thing, because new species are not necessarily good organisms, and they can also cause considerable damage to the environment and may also disrupt the peace of the biological world.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Yes, it is a bad thing, it may lead to a complete imbalance in the biological chain, it may lead to an increasing number of mutant species, and it may affect the development of the social world and social peace.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Yes, you can. It's a bad thing, because most genetic mutations go in a bad direction and are a safety hazard.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Genetic mutations inevitably lead to changes in the genetic code.

    Genetic information must change, but genetic traits are not necessarily, the latter is determined by the degeneracy of genetic information.

    Additions, deletions, or substitutions of base pairs in a gene must alter the base order of the gene, which in turn alters the codons on the transcribed mRNA. Due to the degeneracy of a codon, the change of the base in the codon and sometimes does not change the amino acids that this codon decides. At the same time, the change of individual amino acids in the secondary position of the protein does not have a major effect on the structure and function of the protein.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The base pairs of genes are bound to change.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The first thing to understand is what is a new gene and what is a new genotype.

    A new gene is a new gene that is produced by a mutation.

    A new genotype is a new genotype that results from a free combination.

    It does seem similar, but a simple example will make you understand.

    The mutation of a new gene means that there is a and a b, and the mutation makes one or all of them become c, isn't this a new gene?

    The new genotype is obtained by free combination, that is, there are two cells carrying a, a, b, b and a, a, b, and b, and now the free combination produces the genotype formed by the combination of these four genes, and it is impossible to appear c, d, e, f, g, and so on. It becomes a combination, and it is the type that changes, not the gene itself.

    Got it now?

    Let's understand it by definition.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Gene mutations alter alleles. Alleles are altered, of course, giving rise to new genotypes.

Related questions
10 answers2024-08-10

For humans, genetic mutations can be useful or harmful.

Mutagenesis breeding. This is a useful aspect of genetic mutations by inducing a large and diverse number of genetic mutations in organisms, so that excellent varieties can be bred according to needs. Before the discovery of chemical mutagens, radiation was mainly used as a mutagen in plant breeding. After the discovery of chemical mutagens, the means of mutagenesis increased greatly. >>>More

7 answers2024-08-10

Theoretically yes, but the doctor will be just right according to your condition**, don't worry, there is not every day to do it.

12 answers2024-08-10

Gene mutation is not the same as gene deletion, gene mutation is the addition, deletion or replacement of base pairs inside the gene, the gene is still there, but it has changed, while gene deletion is a chromosome structural variation, it is the deletion of the previous segment of the chromosome that causes the entire gene to be missing.

6 answers2024-08-10

Blue eyes, and a star-shaped iris pattern. Blue eyes are the newest mutation in our genome. Blue-eyed is only about 10,000 years old, which means that there were no blue-eyed humans until the end of the last ice age. >>>More

16 answers2024-08-10

It can't be understood that way, these are two different levels of concept. One is from the micro and the other is from the relative macro. Gene mutation only refers to the variation of gene segments, while chromosomal variation is only the change of the entire chromosome, which cannot be measured by genes, there are too many. >>>More