A 230,000 Maine cat in Xiaoshan was held accountable, do you think the nanny is responsible?

I don't think the babysitter is responsible.

A Maine worth 230,000 yuan in Xiaoshan fell to his death from a height, which was an accident, but the owner put the blame on the nanny, believing that the nanny's negligence caused the accident. I don't think the babysitter is responsible for this matter, and the death of the Maine should be the responsibility of the owner himself, who will bear the corresponding consequences. This nanny is a live-in nanny, not a nanny who specializes in taking care of pets, and it is impossible for her to keep an eye on the owner's pets at all times.

According to the nanny's response, when the cat fell from the upstairs, he was not at home at all and was walking the dog outside, and the owner of the cat was staying indoors with a family of three, and he did not take good care of his pet cat, resulting in the accidental death of the cat from a high-rise building, so the nanny believes that the cat's death has nothing to do with him, this should be an accident, and the cat owner is also responsible if he wants to be held responsible.

The owner of the cat stood up and publicly responded that the cat's accidental death from falling downstairs was related to the nanny's opening of the window, but the nanny said that the opening and closing of the windows at home were carried out under the guidance of the employer, and she did not open the window without authorization. Even if the nanny opens the window at home to ventilate is a legitimate behavior, the owner should take care of his pet when he lives at home, and the pet accidentally falls from a tall building and dies has no direct relationship with the nanny, so he should not hold the nanny responsible.

A legal and valid employment contract has been signed between the nanny and the owner, if it is not indicated in the contract that the nanny's work is related to the pet cat, then he has no obligation and responsibility to take care of and protect the pet cat, the death of the Maine cat was an accident, not caused by the nanny's negligence, and the owner should not put the responsibility for the accident on the nanny, which is very unfair to the nanny. Housekeeping companies also agree with the nanny's statement, arguing that the nanny is a live-in nanny, not a nanny who takes care of pets, and they believe that the nanny is not responsible for the matter. But employers have not been.

But this statement, and withhold the nanny's salary is not paid, and now the two sides are still negotiating, if the negotiation is not good, it may be resolved through legal means.

I think the nanny is responsible, after all, it is because of the nanny's negligence that she did not take good care of the cat, and she needs to bear the liability for compensation.

I think the nanny is responsible, because his duty is to take care of the big and small things in the house, and the cat is also within his scope of responsibility, so the nanny has a certain responsibility.

The nanny also has relevant responsibilities, after all, the main responsibility of the nanny is to take care of everything in the house, and once there is a problem, it is necessary to compensate accordingly, so it does not play a good role in supervision.

I think the nanny should indeed take some responsibility, after all, she didn't take good care of the kittens in the house as the nanny of the house, which is where she was derelict in her duties.

In my opinion, at that time, the employer was at home, the nanny was cleaning and preparing meals, and she was unable to take care of the cat.

The employer said that the nanny mainly took care of the cat, but the nanny did not just take care of the cat after coming to the employer's house, so I think the nanny is not omnipotent, it is impossible to do everything, so the employer deducts the nanny's salary, which is unreasonable! We all know that the nursery sister-in-law and the nanny work separately, the employer wants to hire someone to take care of the child, can not let the child-rearing sister-in-law take care of other work, the same reason, if the employer asks the nanny to take care of the cat, then, should not let the nanny do this and that, if the nanny only does one thing to take care of the cat, it must be able to do a good job, so that there will be no cat falling downstairs!

The employer was at home at the time, how did the nanny know that the cat had gone? Besides, the nanny is not a live-in nanny, so who knows when the cat fell downstairs? In this way, it is somewhat inappropriate for the employer to deduct the nanny job, even if it is to compensate the world chain, it is necessary for both parties to reach a consensus, rather than unilaterally deducting the salary directly!

Netizens are hotly discussed. After the incident was spread on the Internet, netizens said that it is too difficult for the current nanny, and they have been working at the employer's house for more than half a month, and they have no salary, and they have to be scolded! Netizens think that the potential risk of pets is too great, and the employer, as a pet guardian, should take care of the pet at all times.

Indict. If the nanny feels wronged, she can sue for arbitration to claim her salary, and if the employer feels that the nanny should be compensated, it must also come up with evidence to prove that the cat is the nanny's work during the fall of the building! It's not fair to send a message to the babysitter after the babysitter comes home!

"The nanny of the Maine cat worth 230,000 yuan was held accountable" is on the hot search, what do you think about this?

The nanny must not have the obligation to take care of the cat, but when the employer hires the nanny, it means that the world is in place, and I want Brother Chi to find a cat lover, so he shows his attitude, and he must take care of the cat.

The nanny has no obligation to take care of the cat, she is only a servant to people, so helping to take care of the cat is just a kind of affection.

The nanny has no obligation to take care of the cat, mainly because the nanny is out shopping at this time and the employer happens to be at home.

I think the nanny has the responsibility to take care of the cat, since it is the nanny in the family, then the mess in the house, the nanny is also buried to pay more attention, but for such a thing, the owner is also responsible.

This depends on what housework the nanny signs in the family, according to the normal nanny should be laundry, cooking, grocery shopping, these housework may be shared to take care of pets, this should not have much to do with the nanny, but the specific responsibility should be determined according to the content of the contract.

The babysitter should not be held responsible for the cat's accidental fall, because the nanny is not obligated to take care of the cat.

The babysitter should be held accountable accordingly. Because of the Maine, it is very likely that it fell from the building due to human negligence, such as forgetting to close the window and other factors. At the same time, one of the job contents of the nanny is to take care of the cat, and if something happens to the cat, the nanny also has a certain amount of responsibility for dereliction of duty.

The reason why the cat fell from the building was because the nanny did not close the windows at that time, and the employer hired the aunt to take care of the pet aunt and aunt, and did not fulfill the responsibility of holding the cat.

The most fundamental reason is that the family did not close the windows properly, so the cat accidentally fell from under the window.

Summary. Hello dear. The employer responded to the Maine for falling from the building to hold the nanny accountable for 33,000 kilograms and 33 tons.

33 tons is 660 hundred catties. Let's convert 33 tons to kilograms. Because 1 ton = 1000 kg, 33 tons is 33 tons x 1000 kg = 33000 kg.

Then convert kilograms to catties. Because 1 kg = 2 catties, 33,000 kg is 33,000 kg x 2 = 66,000 catties. Then convert the jin into 100 catties, 66000 100 catties = 660 hundred catties.

Therefore, 33 tons is the weight of 660 hundred catties.

Hello dear. The employer responded that the Maine fell from the building and held the nanny responsible for 33,000 male pounds, which was 33 tons. 33 tons is 660 hundred catties.

Let's convert 33 tons to kilograms. Because 1 ton = 1000 kg, 33 tons is 33 tons x 1000 kg = 33000 kg. Then convert kilograms to catties.

Because 1 kg = 2 catties, 33,000 kg of dried cherry blossoms is 33,000 kg x 2 = 66,000 catties. Zi Pao then converts the jin into 100 catties, 66000 100 catties = 660 hundred catties. Therefore, 33 tons is the weight of 660 hundred catties.

Dear, <>

1. Staple food, fully nutritious cat food; Clause.

2. Side dishes, fruits and vegetables are sufficient; Fight the Brigade.

3. Desserts, all kinds of snacks for cats. Therefore, according to the above categories, we need to remember to give cats a comprehensive nutritional development in daily feeding.

From a factual point of view, the nanny should be responsible, because the nanny has a direct cause, not the cat's accident, but because the nanny's mistake caused the cat to have an accident. If there is this reason, then you have to bear this responsibility, but it is just a question of the division of responsibilities and how much money should be paid. <>

If a nanny is hired, then the nanny's obligation is to clean, clean up the house, cook, and then keep the family clean and orderly, and taking care of the cat is also one of the responsibilities. Because when applying for this job, the owner of the cat has made it clear that there is a job to shovel feces for the cat and daily feeding work, including the nanny hired by many families, and he also has the obligation to walk the dog. This is included in the nanny's hiring fee.

If the accident is caused by the subjective reasons of the individual cat, then the nanny should not bear this responsibility and should not pay a penny, but this time the cat had an accident because the nanny did not close the doors and windows properly. <>

The employer did not really, according to the value of the cat itself, because it was not simply the responsibility of the nanny when this happened, but 10% of the responsibility was held accountable according to the proportion, which is far more than the nanny's monthly salary. Because this cat is said to have cost nearly 30,000 yuan when it was bought, perhaps a lot of money has been spent in the process of feeding, 10% is also 1 20,000 nanny a month is only 6,500. <>

So this involves the issue of accountability, then you have to divide the responsibility, if the nanny bears it, don't say that the more than 6,000 yuan, or if you don't come back, you may face greater compensation, and the employer is already very limited at the beginning. That is to say, the matter of deducting a month's salary will not be investigated, but the nanny thinks that she will deduct 1000 yuan at most, and she can't accept it anymore, which is also the source of the dispute. and the arbitration institution court, a determination of whether the job of the nanny itself bears the responsibility of protecting the safety of the cat without a cat, and if so, the compensation must be paid.

In my opinion, although the owner's cats are valuable and have gone into raising them, according to the report, the domestic nanny was not responsible for taking care of the cats and dogs full-time, and the owner was at home at the time, so she should not be fully responsible.

For nannies, many things to do in life have to be negotiated according to the contract, in the matter of taking care of cats and dogs, the nanny does have the problem of negligence, but because the owner is at home, so the responsibility of the other party also needs to bear.

The babysitter is held accountable according to the content of the contract.

Nowadays, many domestic nannies are selected by specialized companies for docking, so there must be more complete rules and terms on the contract. At the beginning of the contract, the owner should stipulate the scope of the babysitter's daily work. The labor contract itself must be subject to the relevant terms agreed by both parties, so what kind of responsibility should be borne in the facts of the situation that the housekeeper caused the cat to fall from the building, it depends on whether the signed contract clearly stipulates whether the scope of work and responsibilities of the nanny includes special care for the cat.

This will directly determine the division of responsibilities. <>

If it is a case of oral negotiation, offline mediation can be conducted.

But in this case, this nanny not only has to take care of the cats at home, but also has to take on the work of buying groceries and cooking and walking the dog downstairs, and the time itself is relatively tight. Therefore, it is forgivable for the poor care of the cat, and according to the parties, the owner of the family only deducted a month's salary and punished him, while the other arrears and the accountability person did not have much demand. <>

But in this case, the nanny should not be fully responsible.

Because of this, the nanny should not be fully responsible, and should be more aware of the pet while the owner of the household is still at home. Especially cats, which like to climb animals, should be protected from the windows of the home to avoid this problem. With so many jobs as a nanny, it's impossible to take special care of an animal alone.

The nanny should not be responsible, he is usually very busy, and he must not be able to take care of the cat all the time.

To be responsible, in addition to wage settlement, the employer said that the nanny was looking for a nanny to take care of the cat, but the nanny failed to close the doors and windows as instructed, and the cat fell from the building.

I don't think so, under normal circumstances, the employer and the domestic helper sign a labor contract, and the labor contract should be subject to the terms agreed by both parties. Therefore, the responsibility of the domestic helper in this matter depends on whether the signed contract clearly stipulates the scope of work and responsibilities.

It is said that the Maine was picked up from abroad, worth 230,000 yuan, and the employer responded during the live broadcast on Douyin, and its statement never asked the aunt to compensate 230,000 yuan, which is completely out of context.