Are morally corrupt scientists necessarily incapable of making achievements?

Good people are not necessarily scientists, bad people are not necessarily unable to do earth-shattering things, these days, all parts of the country are recruiting talents, to be honest, the so-called talents now, one in 10,000 people is a scientist is already good, where do so many talents come from!

This is a false proposition, and it is impossible for scientists who have made great contributions to mankind to be immoral.

I don't think there are completely unvirtuous scientists, most scientists' immorality is only reflected in some individual things (of course, there are a few counter-examples), and some of the facts are magnified by later generations because of their celebrity status as scientists.

Don't be bound by the concept of Buddha, everyone has their own beliefs, and what they achieve is also what they want to do. If you follow the teachings of Buddhism, you can't, but if you get it and get it according to what you want and want in your heart, how is it different from a Buddha?

He can become a Buddha. Science and technology can benefit the public, and his achievements have reached the realm of Buddhahood.

He can also disregard morality and create a new culture, which is the Buddha of Buddhas.

You must know that Buddhism is about "karma", and if you do bad things, you will receive retribution.

And if a scientist is not afraid of retribution, has the courage to innovate and make breakthroughs, and disregards his own reputation to create a new culture and a new story, if it is purposeful and deliberate, what kind of realm will it be?

There is no doubt that reaching the state of a Buddha is a matter of drizzle. Beg!

Why did Einstein have high morality, I personally think that this is a kind of demand for people who worship, approve or like themselves, to put it bluntly, you recognize Einstein, and even worship him, so you want the person you recognize, the person you worship, is a perfect person, is an idealized person, I think this is a kind of self-affirmation, just like in life, it is difficult for others to accept others to accuse their relatives, friends, hometown, etc., when others deny these, it is like being denied, is intolerable. Linked to Einstein, the subject may have heard about him for the first time, it was when he heard about his scientific achievements, which led to recognition, worship or something, and then the subject has already been connected with Einstein, and if Einstein is denied, it is like being denied himself. As a result, one day I suddenly saw that Einstein's private life history was completely inconsistent with his own moral standards, and even far from his idealized idol, which was entangled.

In fact, before a person has achievements, fame, and wealth, he is first and foremost a person, and if he is a person, he cannot jump out of human nature or human needs. It is done by man to sacrifice oneself to save others, it is also done by man to harm others and benefit oneself, noble things are done by man, and the things of animals are also done by man. No one is perfect, perfection itself is a contradictory concept, there is no defect, how can it be called perfect, with the defect, let alone perfection, we have no need to ask others to be perfect, because that will only confuse ourselves.

So Einstein is a scumbag on the emotional side, how can he be a person, we affirm his scientific achievements in imitation of repentance, and do not deny that he is a scumbag, that's all.

We can't say that the wicked are incapable, nor can we say that the good can save the world, this boundary is related to you, objective evaluation is often limited to individuals, and really when you participate in the subjective and objective evaluation is meaningful, just like a gas bomb if your loved one is hurt No matter how good the inventor is, you will not be treated to him, if the dust gas bomb protects you from aggression, how bad the inventor is, you will forgive him, and the real virtue you evaluate lies in whether you participate in it. "Stand on the shoulders of giants" is Newton's insult to Hooke's short stature; The suppression and attack on Leibniz because of calculus made Newton a laughing stock for a while; Newton devoted himself to theology in his later years, and ironically, his evidence was the scientific laws he had deduced with his own hands, and he firmly claimed that such perfect laws must be ...... created by GodEinstein was not recognized by the academic community in his early years, and the special theory of relativity was not understood and did not win the Nobel Prize until 1921, when he was reluctantly awarded the Nobel Prize by the Nobel Prize Committee because of the photoelectric effect; And in his later years, when he became a representative of Zen physics, he became the abyss he once gazed at, and he became the dragon he claimed to have killed, and all his descendants lived in his shadow.