What is the difference between science and Buddhism? Which is higher in science or Buddhism

Science includes natural sciences and social sciences; Philosophy is part of the social sciences; Philosophy includes materialist philosophy and idealistic philosophy; Buddhism belongs to a branch of idealistic philosophy. To put it simply, it is a relationship that is included in turn.

Religion is a perception of the external world and is strongly soothing through forms (rituals, doctrines, architecture, paintings, chanting). Philosophy speaks in general terms of worldview and methodological theory.

1. Buddhism is not a science. Buddhism, you forget about learning.

2. Buddhism tells you that dialectical materialism is a skillful deception. There is no standard beforehand, how to argue? If there is a standard beforehand, where does it come from?

3. Buddhism tells you that spiritualism is the first of all evils.

4. Buddhism tells you that science, because of its hypotheses and empirical limitations, can only be temporary, relative, and boundary.

5. Buddhism tells you how to look at things objectively and materialistically.

Some people always want to use science to deny Buddhism, and even think that Buddhism is feudal superstition. But there are thousands of years of culture, how many generations of faith, how many things have worked. Something that can't be explained by science.

In the vast universe, earthlings are certainly not only children. Albert Einstein also proposed the condition of traveling through time and space. To have conditions is to be possible, that is, to have a past life and a present life.

The difference between data and theory.

The empirical evidence of science is implemented in the reasoning of the left brain, and the empirical evidence of Buddhism is implemented in the direct perception of the right brain.

The highest state of Buddhism is the great unity, including the unity of the left and right brains.

The goal of science is the study of all existence, including the state of great unity.

The great unification of course also includes the unification of Buddhism and science.

The left brain is constantly differentiating, the right brain is constantly integrating and distinction, and the left and right brains are opposing and unifying, constantly surpassing the past.

There is no end to evolution, there is no end to science, and the Buddha always has to come back to work, otherwise he will be backward and outdated.

Discriminating mind is the basis of human evolution and the reason for the existence of Buddhism.

Science is based on the separation of minds, a deviation from the previously fixed unified realm, and a separation of subject and object. The meaning of Buddhism's existence is to tolerate this deviation, to carry out a higher level of unity with this deviation, and to carry out a higher level of unity of subject and object. Constantly deviating, deviating and returning, returning and deviating, and returning.

The left and right brains are unified in the right brain, the human body is unified in the mind, and reasoning and direct perception are unified in direct perception. Dialectical materialism holds that matter and spirit are unified with matter. These views are all in agreement.

Inferential arguments must be based on certain assumptions, which are all approximations of reality. The results of science cannot transcend relative truth. The intuitive perception is the unity of the direct and cognitive object, so it is in line with reality, but everyone's intuitive perception is different, and the level of unity with the environment is also different, only a few people can achieve the ultimate enlightenment, this level must surpass the current science.

But science is also evolving, and who can predict what will happen to science when scientists also become Buddhist practitioners?

Science is the accumulation of knowledge, not wisdom, and today's science is tomorrow's unscience, and the great wisdom of Buddhism is on the other side, and there is no comparison between prajna jackfruit.

Science, that is, this subject does not know which subject! It's like countless tubes, each with its own science inside! It's right in this tube, it's wrong in that tube!

Buddhism, on the other hand, is about where the pipe comes from and where it goes, and the ingredients and results must be understood! So there's really no comparison!