Debate on Saving Thank you, the debate on thrift is square

To be honest, foreigners always eat a good place to eat, and the rest are thrown away, so it's a waste! What are we compared to them? People living in society are to consume, and there may be no strict conclusions and regulations on what is thrifty and what is not save, so no one should interfere with who is wasting.

If you have something to say, please remain silent. It's useless!

Ideas: If we blindly emphasize frugality, then the society will only stagnate, and there will be motivation when there is pressure.

Text: Not being frugal does not mean waste, on the contrary, it is an indispensable process to promote social development. The so-called pressure will be motivated. Consuming something appropriately is in fact an opportunity to produce something.

If frugality is emphasized, society will only stagnate. In real life, it's not always time to be frugal or to be at your best. When necessary, there is no need to pretend to be very frugal, you can use it however you want, if you are too frugal and become a kind of stinginess, it will make people very disgusted.

So I'm against frugality.

Summary. Of course, thrift and thrift will not be outdated, because thrift is the traditional virtue of the Chinese people, and thrift can be reflected on at all times, and it is the efforts of our ancestors that have brought about a better life today. We must use diligence and thrift to save life, save money, and save time, to commemorate them, and let us change for the better.

Is thrift obsolete debate contest opponent argument Friend, my debate contest is whether thrift is outdated, I am the opposing side, can you provide a few for me.

Of course, the imitation of thrift will not be outdated, because thrift and thrift are the traditional virtues of the Chinese people. We must use diligence and thrift to save life, save money, save time, to commemorate them, and let us change for the better. Swift Fiber.

What I need is the outcome of the argument on the opposing side.

What I need is the outcome of the argument on the opposing side.

Will it be obsolete, will it.

That's right, dear.

With the development of society and the progress of the times, the living standard of dizzy is constantly improving and improving, and almost every family is rushing to live a well-off life. Therefore, in many potato blind fiber families, the labor force is mainly the use of science and Zen skills, so diligence and thrift can not be done, because mental activities can not do the number of imitation of young people and save, we save water, save electricity, but save sometimes, in some aspects will also seem stingy.

Well, that's well said.

Thank you. The debate is about to begin, and the opponent is really embarrassed. Uh-huh. ok

After the consultation, please complete this order.

(1) Introduction It is an indisputable fact that human society is always developing, material life is becoming more and more abundant, and people's lifestyles and consumption concepts are also constantly changing. However, this is not contradictory to advocating frugality, which means cherishing the limited resources of human beings and the fruits of human labor, and that is, absorbing the spirit of arduous struggle from the fine traditions of our ancestors. (2) Factual arguments ***'s frugal life There is such a scene in the TV documentary "***", ***'s health care doctor picks up a towel blanket used by *** before his death, which is full of patches.

He said that he had repeatedly urged the Lord to change the flag to a new one, but he had been refused. This is a portrayal of real life. When I was in Yan'an, I wore an old military uniform that was washed white, and there were 16 patches.

One of his old slippers had holes in the soles and threads on the uppers, which were sewn up and continued to be worn. He once said: "I can afford to change a towel blanket, but I can't afford to lose the spirit of hard struggle of the Communists."

Xu Teli's "Chalk Poem" Xu Teli, a calligrapher Tao, is a native of Changsha, Hunan. Proletarian revolutionary, educator. There is "Xu Teli Education Anthology" handed down.

He pays attention to moral cultivation and is frugal in his life. When he was the principal of Hunan No. 1 Girls' Normal School, he wrote a "chalk poem" and copied it on the blackboard and published it on the campus: Half of the chalk is still cherished, and public objects should always be cherished.

The sentient beings do not understand the rest of the heart, but the rest is a small person. When he visited the school every day, he always picked up the chalk heads that others had discarded and put them in his pocket for his own class. During his years at the Hunan No. 1 Women's Normal (also known as the Rice Field Teacher's College), he barely used a new piece of chalk.

Some students didn't understand and felt that he was too "stingy". Therefore, Xu Teli wrote poems to educate students. Feng Yuxiang praised Tong Linge Feng Yuxiang, the word Huanzhang, a native of Chaoxian County, Anhui.

Born in the army, he has successively served as brigade commander and division commander of the Beiyang Army, overseer of Shaanxi and Henan, commander-in-chief of the National Army, commander-in-chief of the Kuomintang Second Group Army, and deputy chairman of the Kuomintang ** Military Committee. Although he was in a high position, he lived a frugal life.