-
Of course it's acceptable, a woman has gone through a lot of hardships in order to give birth to a man a child, and even her life hangs by a thread in the operating room, and she is completely fighting for her life, so why can't she let her child follow the woman's sex?
In fact, many women are reluctant to have children now, because after giving birth to a child, the child does not say the man's surname, and it takes a lot of hard work to raise the child, and the child's father is the same as being single, as if everything is a woman's and has nothing to do with him. After giving birth, men should play with their mobile phones, watch TV, and socialize, while women lose everything and can only revolve around their children all day long.
Having a child seems to reverse all his fate for a woman, but it has no effect on men, on the contrary, men feel that they are particularly tired from working outside, and they should play with their mobile phones or socialize outside when they get home to relieve stress. But is it really that men are more stressed than women?
Isn't it much more difficult for a woman to sleep all night with her hair that is about to fall out, and I will never be satisfied, and then the pain in my body after giving birth to a child? But how did the woman complain, it was not diligently pulling her own child, this child was of two people, but in the end it became a woman alone.
So what's so bad about having a child and a woman's sex? Why should the hard-earned child follow the man's surname, and the man did not take good care of it, nor did he give the child a complete childhood, let alone tutor the child's homework, so why should he follow the man's surname?
To be fair, a woman's child also has the right to follow womanhood, after all, a woman gives birth to a child, raises a child, and pulls the eldest child with one hand, it is really not easy for a woman.
-
If the wife gives birth to a daughter, it is acceptable. It's the new modern society, and having a daughter is the same as having a son. There is basically no difference.
-
What era is it now, sons and daughters are the same. And now the daughter is more popular. Don't think about things with old ideas, a good daughter who is educated by a child can also be a son.
-
Why is it unacceptable? I really want my son to be reborn! What age are you still asking this kind of question!
-
Why is it unacceptable? Daughters and sons are all their own, what age is it? What age? Is it still patriarchal?
Although I am not a man, I also want to share my opinion, not every man can accept this fact. If my wife had the surgery before she got married and didn't tell me before she got married, I couldn't accept it. >>>More
It's a bit of both. Anyway, I don't think it matches.
1. Legally, it is allowed, and there is no question of accepting or not accepting. Because the law can't control it. >>>More
Of course, now there are more Dinks who are married and don't have children. You think, this marriage is the house first, if the house is taken care of, it is the car, and if the car is also taken care of, there will be living expenses for both of you. But raising a child now, not only for his schooling but also for his future, what environment do you want your child to grow up in? >>>More
I think it's acceptable, she should know how to cherish you more in the future, but the premise is that she and his husband must divorce first, otherwise his wife can do whatever she wants, you can't help if you want to, and you still have a loss, you can also sue you, then you will become a third party, it also depends on whether the man is willing to leave, it is only possible if both parties are willing, good luck!! >>>More