Which is more important, economic poverty alleviation or knowledge poverty alleviation?

I think this issue should be viewed dialectically, and the following will be elaborated separately:

1.Knowledge for poverty alleviation. For young poor households.

Knowledge is particularly important for poverty alleviation, and knowledge is power.

It can stimulate endogenous motivation and change a life; If it is aimed at the elderly and elderly poor households, knowledge poverty alleviation will have a long way to go, because the elderly have solidified thinking and cannot accept new knowledge, knowledge poverty alleviation can only be three minutes of heat. Knowledge poverty alleviation is especially important for poor households whose causes of poverty are lack of technology, lack of labor, poverty due to disability, lack of funds, and lack of motivation for their own development.

Now with the rapid development of science and technology, knowledge is power, and knowledge is money; Poverty alleviation departments at the county or township level will organize many skills training for poor households every year or even every month and every week to find skills training that suits them, so that they can master a knowledge and skill, so that they will not have money to earn in the future.

2.Economic poverty alleviation. Some poor households have thoughts and brains, resulting in poverty is caused by illness, disasters, lack of development and other reasons, so that you only need financial support, to tide over the difficulties will have the function of self-hematopoiesis, backward poor households, can only economic poverty alleviation, take the civil affairs to make up for the shortcomings, and be well-off together.

For poor households with serious illnesses, economic help is particularly important, but now there are many preferential policies for the treatment of serious illnesses in national policies, such as: first first and then pay, low outpatient threshold payment line, increased reimbursement ratio, and one-stop service.

Wait. It is particularly important to provide financial assistance to poor households that have suddenly changed their families due to disasters, so as to help them regain hope and confidence.

At a deeper level, whether it is knowledge poverty alleviation or economic poverty alleviation, the purpose is the same, all of which are to help more people get rid of poverty and become rich. Knowledge poverty alleviation and economic poverty alleviation are actually complementary to each other, there is no need to oppose the two, there is no need to argue about who is more important, knowledge poverty alleviation is the foundation, economic poverty alleviation is the leading.

Poverty alleviation through the economy is very important. Because people's lives are inseparable from the economy, only when a good life is guaranteed, everyone will learn.

Knowledge for poverty alleviation is even more important. Because knowledge can change destiny and change the future, knowledge can make us work, it can make us rich.

It must be that knowledge poverty alleviation is more important, because if we do a good job in knowledge poverty alleviation, it is very likely that after all employees have this opportunity to receive education, our economy will get better and better.

Knowledge for poverty alleviation is even more important. Knowledge can change the future, and knowledge lasts a lifetime.

I think economic poverty alleviation is even more important. Because without the environment and conditions, we will not be able to create good results in poverty alleviation. This is the same as "if you want to get rich, you must first build roads".

1. Economic poverty alleviation.

The so-called economic poverty alleviation is to achieve the role of poverty alleviation by injecting funds into a region, dispatching talents, and providing technical assistance. I think this is equivalent to "build roads first" in "if you want to get rich, build roads first". It's like a poor village, and no amount of knowledge we inject into it is useless, because objective living conditions will tell them that this knowledge may not be useful at the moment.

But if we build a road for this village, then there will be outside money, and the people in the village will be able to go out and see the world, then a lot of their perceptions will naturally change. The talents provided in the process of economic poverty alleviation can play an effective role, and the technical assistance to the peasants in all aspects will be supported by the peasants, so as to achieve the effect of poverty alleviation.

2. Poverty alleviation through knowledge.

Knowledge poverty alleviation is equivalent to injecting knowledge into this impoverished village. For example, providing free education and free lunch for children from poor families, only when the children of this generation change, they will change the entire hometown and their next generation. Poverty alleviation through knowledge is the improvement of the quality of the entire group of people, and is a long-term benefit, and knowledge can not only achieve the benefits of getting rich in the future, but also play a major role in promoting the development of an individual's life.

3. Complementary roles.

Knowledge poverty alleviation and economic poverty alleviation are mutually reinforcing. Economic poverty alleviation is to achieve all-round and precise poverty alleviation in material aspects, first fill everyone's stomachs, so that they have time to think about how to get more money and materials. Knowledge can empower people to create wealth, of course, provided that we survive first, and then have countless knowledge that can help us change our lives for the better.

That is why knowledge poverty alleviation and economic poverty alleviation are mutually reinforcing. <>

I think knowledge is more important for poverty alleviation, because people's attitude towards life and a person's pattern are created through knowledge. Poverty alleviation in terms of knowledge can increase the quality of the population. Let people face the world with a better eye.

I think that poverty alleviation through knowledge is more important, and economic poverty alleviation can only play a role after understanding poverty alleviation.

I think knowledge is more important for poverty alleviation. Because knowledge can change destiny, if the problem of knowledge poverty can be solved, this can lead to economic development.

I think the people who ask this question still don't see the concrete social reality. The answer to this question is not good, and I think that in today's society, it is not something that can be solved by simply choosing one of the two paths of "economic poverty alleviation" or "knowledge poverty alleviation". It's not that these two paths are bad, but we should choose according to the reality of each place, "economic poverty alleviation" or "knowledge poverty alleviation" first, not simply generalizing and telling you which answer is more important.

Why do I say that, I want to popularize Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory first. In Maslow's view, physiological needs, which we often call material needs, are the most basic needs, followed by the needs of security, socialization, personal respect and the realization of personal self-worth. It is not difficult to understand that a person has not yet solved his stomach problem, solved the problem of dressing, talked about other needs, hunger and warmth are the most primitive instinctive needs.

Therefore, in some remote rural areas or western regions, many people are still in the stage of struggling for food and clothing, so it is obviously inappropriate for you to talk to them about poverty alleviation through knowledge. Therefore, for these places, the first thing should be economic poverty alleviation, so that they can first achieve economic self-sufficiency and solve their own food and clothing problems, and then they can have the spare energy to talk about the relief and realization of cultural knowledge.

However, for some other places, economic development has reached a level, and their own physiological and material needs have been realized, and then they will move to a higher level of demand, and at this time, what they need may be knowledge poverty alleviation. In fact, there are still such places in China. For example, some mining areas, due to their abundant resources, achieved economic self-sufficiency very early.

However, due to the lack of knowledge, people in these places often only focus on immediate economic interests and ignore long-term development, and many people give up education prematurely to work in mines.

Therefore, in order to truly achieve the balanced development of a region, it is necessary to provide targeted policy support in light of the actual local situation, so as to achieve twice the result with half the effort. Therefore, do not jump to conclusions, whether it is "economic poverty alleviation" or "knowledge poverty alleviation" still needs on-the-spot investigation to prescribe the right medicine.

I think economic poverty alleviation is even more important. Because without the environment and conditions, we will not be able to create good results in poverty alleviation. This is the same as "if you want to get rich, you must first build roads".

Economic Poverty Alleviation The so-called economic poverty alleviation is to achieve the role of poverty alleviation by injecting funds into a region, dispatching talents, and providing technical assistance.

Knowledge for poverty alleviation. Economic poverty alleviation can only bring some economic growth to certain impoverished areas, but after the knowledge poverty alleviation is done well, it can greatly improve the economic level.

In today's society, knowledge poverty alleviation will be more important than economic poverty alleviation, because social competition is fierce, and it is difficult to get out of poverty if you do not have knowledge.

I think it is more important to alleviate poverty through knowledge, because with knowledge we can create wealth and develop the economy, and knowledge is the most important.

Examples: 1. Economic poverty alleviation has greater results in a short period of time.

For example, if you are a poverty alleviation primary school, you have to wait for all students to complete their studies and become talents in the future, and then gain the ability to survive, work hard to complete the primitive accumulation of capital, and then start to invest, and then produce tangible and intangible benefits; And if you directly invest in a factory or do something, in a relatively short period of time, you can change the objective conditions, change the old appearance, and change the living conditions and results.

2. The scope of application of economic poverty alleviation is wider.

If a 20-year-old person starts to go to Hope Primary School, and let him do something directly, what do you say? Besides, while obtaining economic poverty alleviation, he does not exclude the absorption of knowledge, which is not necessarily to be improved through knowledge poverty alleviation, but also learning in the accumulation of time, and can also learn in economic poverty alleviation.

Economic poverty alleviation is like a quick-acting pill, although it cannot be the first lesion, but it can indeed save people in danger; However, knowledge poverty alleviation has a long cycle, large investment, and slow results, and when the knowledge is learned well, it is too late to come to poverty alleviation, and you can only sweep the graves of those who have starved to death.

In the final analysis, poverty alleviation depends on policies!

Knowledge creates wealth.

Knowledge is money.

Knowledge enriches lives.

Can be strong. Knowledge is the most important thing.

Poverty alleviation through knowledge requires a slow process.

And economic poverty alleviation is coming faster.

When you have money, you will figure out how to make money.

When you think about how to make money, you will gradually understand.

Knowledge! The benefits of making money with money.

Poverty alleviation through knowledge requires a slow process.

And economic poverty alleviation is coming faster.

When you have money, you will figure out how to make money.

When you think about how to make money, you will gradually understand.

Knowledge! The benefits of making money with money.

Most people end up complaining about how well they are doing and how much money they have in their pockets, rather than how much culture they have.

Poverty alleviation means being still in poverty. It is necessary to define the reputation of poverty and the poor.

The end result of economic poverty alleviation and knowledge poverty alleviation is to stay away from poverty. Since this topic has appeared, it proves that both the economy and knowledge are in a state of hypocrisy, and the question of which priority is discussed. Economic issues come first.

For man must first live. Knowledge is an enhancement, an aspect of economic development, but not the whole story. At this time, the concept of knowledge is narrowly defined.

Don't let the other party say that economic construction is also a manifestation of knowledge. Knowledge is the support of the economy and the condition for economic growth. It is a condition for "growth", not something that should be talked about in the first place when the economy still needs to be poor.

Economic poverty alleviation is not just a blind donation of money and food, which is not called poverty alleviation, but charity. Rather, it is to lead the local government to do a good job in the economy. First of all, the hall attendant should let people make their own food. The second is to improve.

First, judging the importance of things by their order is a mistake in the Logos Chronicles. It's like when I wake up in the morning and brush my teeth before washing my face, but it doesn't prove that brushing my teeth is more important than washing my face.

Second, confusing concepts. Emergency relief is the solution of sudden injuries or crises. Of course, it is necessary to ensure the lives of those who are about to starve to death, but emergency relief is not the same as poverty alleviation referred to in today's debate, and the opponent's debaters do not have a deep understanding of the debate.

Third, change the concept. The other side has repeatedly secretly replaced knowledge poverty alleviation and economic poverty alleviation with knowledge and economy, and then compared them, ignoring the imminent issue of poverty alleviation, and once again deviating from the topic of debate.

Fourth, the other side subjectively attributes knowledge poverty alleviation to the category of economic poverty alleviation, and one-sidedly emphasizes the economy. It's like asking us which is sweeter, fruit or watermelon.