Under what circumstances can the assessment of public institutions be set as indefinite?

1) For those who are in probation or have not completed the probationary period, they should be assessed and written comments, and the results of the assessment should be used as the basis for regular grading, identification and appointment of professional and technical positions or assignments, but the grade is uncertain.

2) Persons who received a punishment of demerit or higher in the current year should generally be designated as unqualified. 3) Persons who are currently undergoing organizational case filing and review but have not closed the case are to be evaluated annually, and the level is not fixed for the time being, and it is to be determined after the issue is clarified.

4) Persons who have accumulated more than half a year of leave due to illness or personal leave, or who have gone abroad to visit relatives for more than half a year of the current year, shall be of varying ranks.

1. Newly hired personnel who have not participated in the work, participate in the assessment, only write comments, indefinite grades, and the assessment situation is used as the basis for job grading.

2. Personnel who have not yet completed the case for review will only be evaluated, and will not write comments for the time being, and the order will not be determined. After the case is concluded, where no party discipline or government discipline sanctions are given, the evaluation level is to be supplemented; Where party discipline or government discipline sanctions are given, it is to be handled in accordance with provisions.

3. Personnel who have received administrative demerits, major demerits, demotion, or dismissal are only to write comments in the annual evaluation during the period when the punishment has not been lifted, and the evaluation situation is to be the basis for their dismissal.

4. The year in which he received a serious warning from the Party for a mistake unrelated to his or her official conduct; the second year of Party probation for one year; the second and third years of Party probation for two years; In the second and third years of being expelled from the party, they will participate in the assessment and only write comments, with an indefinite grade.

It means that the assessment level is not determined.

Public institutions do not conduct year-end assessments during the first year of probationary periods, and the year-end assessment grades refer to incompetent, basically competent, competent, and excellent, but the number of probationary periods in the first year is uncertain, and only qualified and unqualified.

The person in charge of the public institution is responsible for the assessment. When necessary, the responsible person of a public institution may authorize the deputy at the same level or the responsible person of a relevant institution to be responsible for the evaluation. The assessment is divided into ordinary assessment and annual assessment.

The usual assessment is carried out at any time, and the assessee regularly records the facts according to the work task, and the leader in charge is responsible for the verification. The annual appraisal is generally conducted at the end of each year or the beginning of the following year. The annual assessment is based on the usual assessment.

The annual evaluation grades of personnel of public institutions are excellent, qualified, basically qualified, and unqualified.

The content of the assessment includes four aspects: morality, ability, diligence and performance.

The assessment method is to combine the leadership with the masses, the combination of time-to-prepare and regular, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative.

The assessment procedures include assessment preparation, personal summary, democratic evaluation, chief examiner evaluation, review, publicity, submission for review and filing, feedback, archiving, etc.

The basic standards for the assessment of professional and technical personnel at all levels

Excellent, support the line, principles and policies of the party and the state, and abide by the laws, regulations and rules and regulations of the country in an exemplary manner.

and professional ethics, strong sense of responsibility, diligence and dedication, strong professional and technical ability or fast improvement, innovative work, outstanding achievements in scientific research, teaching, business and technical work.

Qualified, support the line, principles and policies of the party and the state, consciously abide by the laws, regulations and various rules and regulations and professional ethics of the state, work responsibly, be proficient in business, have strong professional and technical ability or improve quickly, be able to perform job responsibilities and complete work tasks, and have no liability accidents.

Unqualified, low political and professional quality, organizational discipline.

Poor, difficult to adapt to the requirements of the job, or the sense of responsibility is not strong, poor performance of job responsibilities, unable to complete the work task, causing serious mistakes or liability accidents in the work.

Those who are rated as excellent and qualified can receive 13 salaries for the current year.

You can receive performance awards and be promoted normally.

Those who are rated as basically qualified and unqualified will not be able to enjoy the above-mentioned or balanced treatment, and it will also affect future promotions.

The annual assessment of public institutions is graded and divided into excellent, qualified, basically qualified, and unqualified.

The content of the assessment mainly includes the four aspects of the employee's morality, ability, diligence and performance. The method of assessment is mainly the method of combining the leadership with the masses. The process of assessment includes preparation, summary, evaluation, evaluation, review, publicity, filing, feedback, archiving, etc.

Assessment methods for public institutions:

1. Excellent: Abide by the laws and regulations of the country.

There are also rules and regulations.

And a sense of responsibility for work.

To be strong, diligent and dedicated, be able to innovate in the work, and have outstanding business performance.

2. Qualified: clarify the basic policy of the country, abide by laws, regulations and various rules and regulations, be conscientious and responsible in the face of work, proficient in business, be able to perform job responsibilities, complete work tasks excellently, and have no liability accidents.

3. Unqualified: It is the high political quality of employees.

Relatively low, poor discipline, no way to adapt to work, weak sense of responsibility, unable to perform job responsibilities, unable to complete tasks, resulting in Qi Xiang's serious mistakes or liability accidents.

Hello, the impact is as follows: because the assessment is uncertain for two years, the incentive mechanism of employees will be affected, and they will feel that there is no clear goal, and they will not be motivated to complete the work. 2. Impact performance evaluation:

Without a definite appraisal level, it will be difficult for agency supervisors and managers to accurately assess the performance of each employee, which will have a negative impact on the performance management of the organization. 3. Affect promotion opportunities: The uncertain grade of the assessment for two years will affect the promotion opportunities of employees, because there is no clear assessment grade, and employees may encounter many difficulties and challenges in promotion.

Fourth, affect the development of the institution: the assessment of two years of uncertainty will affect the development of the institution, because there is no clear assessment level, the institution can not accurately assess the ability of employees, and it is impossible to correctly guide and guide the development direction of the institution.