I bought a nikond 3000 set last year, and now I want to buy a new one, but I only have a budget of a

The Nikon D700 is currently the most cost-effective full-frame SLR, but despite this, Wan can almost only buy the body of the D700.

And the D700 pixels are also relatively low and do not support the camera function.

The D300S is also currently available as a mid-range SLR, which can also play a stable role in extremely harsh environments, such as desert terrain and the Antarctic Arctic.

If it's a budget, you can upgrade a D7000 with a body + a better lens.

Or the body of the D5100 + a good lens.

Or they are directly invested in the lens (the lens is very valuable compared to the body).

You can buy a small bamboo cannon to play with: AFS VR70-200 (guaranteed not to depreciate in value within 3 years).

Wait for the D800 to be launched and then replace the D800 body.

2.If you are really optimistic about the D300S, you can choose the lens of the Nikon 18-200 and go all over the world in one shot.

Avoid the hassle and damage caused by changing lenses in harsh environments.

After the body +50, it will be equipped with 24-70 (10,000+) and other lenses to play.

D300S Gross D700 will be more than 1W5 The budget is less than D300S is now 9K with a 16-85 4600 or so (telephoto, fixed focus is still recommended to be a good point) Pretty much the same.

If your budget is less than 5000 and you prefer a more convenient zoom, then 16-85mm should be the best choice (**4300 or so). Because other original Nikon lenses of the same grade as it: 24-120mm, 24-85mm, 18-200mm are not as good as it.

First of all, the 16-85mm focal length rough grip segment is suitable after multiplying the coefficient on the APS-C frame, and there is a wide angle and a little telephoto, and landscape portraits are no problem, and wide angle is still essential for people who like to shoot landscapes. Compared with 18-200 (one lens to go all over the world), the imaging can be more guaranteed, and I am really not satisfied with the imaging effect that has gone all over the world. People who believe in professional points will separate the wide-angle Qing Brigade from the telephoto.

The only disadvantage of this lens is that the aperture is smaller, and the background bokeh is more difficult

Head use,His large aperture just makes up for the lack of 16-85,And this head is only 700 yuan,Don't look at it cheap,The imaging quality is still quite good,It can be said that it is a cost-effective lens,It is definitely worth having in the case of a small budget。

If you plan to upgrade the lens in the future, don't buy a zoom lens with a budget of 5000. If you have high requirements for image quality, you may not be able to accept a mid-range or lower zoom head. After all, like a 16-85mm lens and a 17-55mm lens

f
-70mm

There is still a big gap in the picture quality.

You can consider playing with the prime (35mm) first

Left and right, 50mm

Left and right, 50mm

left and right). Among them, I recommend the AF-S first

dx35mm

This one, because it happens to be a header on the APS-C format, is very easy to use. These fixed foci can be said to be cheap and good, and the imaging effect can be comparable to tens of thousands of yuan of zoom. Of course, the disadvantage of fixed focus is that it is not very convenient and is not conducive to composition.

If you plan to upgrade the lens in the future, I recommend 17-55mm if the economy allows

Definitely preferred, of course I don't exclude 24-70mm

However, I feel that it is better with D700, and there is no wide angle on the D300, and it is too expensive. However, the ** of 17-55mm has also risen a lot recently, nearly 1000 yuan higher than the lowest in history of about 8700, and you can save money while watching and watching.

If you have any questions, please feel free to discuss!

You choose 18-200.

Nikon. Nicole.

af-sdx

vrzoom-nikkor

ed18-200mm

if) lenses.

Key features: AF-SDXVR

Zoom Nikkrel.

18-200mm

F IF-ED lenses are lightweight, and zoom lenses are ideal for everyday photography. Premium features include Nikon's ultra-low dispersion glass, Quiet Wave Motor (SWM), an improved Vibration Reduction System (VR), and a lens optical design optimized for Nikon digital SLR cameras. This lens is convenient and easy to use, with zoom blocks up to 18-200

Millimeters (the angle of which is equivalent to a 27-300 mm lens in a 35 mm format) can be seen in everything from wide landscapes to narrow portraits. Nikon's advanced engineering technology makes the design lighter and provides excellent handling characteristics.

Technical characteristics: Lens structure (composition).

I use にイコン

Camera angle in DX format.

76 degrees. 8 degrees.

Minimum f stop

Minimum focusing distance (macro setting).

m ft. Maximum double-opening sail ratio (macro setting).

Filter size.

72 mm. Diameter x length (extension from the lens mount) in mm.

Weight (approximately).

560 grams. Yes Sedan: Yes or no support for D40: Yes.

In terms of picture quality, maybe the D5100 is a little better. However, I think it's better to buy a second-hand D90, both of which are better than these two.

The Nikon D5100 is a good choice for the Standard Mirror 50

Judging from the ** you buy these two machines, I recommend choosing 3200

First, your purchase budget is not much, and buying a DSR in this case should focus on cost performance. Therefore, I think it is far more affordable to buy a double hood than to buy a 5100. And the 3200 is a brand new machine, both in terms of reliability and cost performance.

Second, from the perspective of the product itself, there is no essential difference between 5100 and 3200, and 5100 is negligible except that it is half a circle larger than 3200. Buying a camera is not buying a car, the A6 and A8 in the car are completely two levels, whether it is space, power, or workmanship, they are not the same.

Therefore, from the perspective of use, there is no need to worry about 5100 is a machine with a 5 start, and 3200 is a low-end machine that starts with 3.

Actually, in addition to Nikon, I would be more than happy to recommend you to buy Pentax K50, I just bought one for a friend two days ago, which is great! I'm a Nikon Pentax double major, but Nikon's colors don't suit portraits, yellowish, and gray. Pentax colors are different, transparent, and intense, especially for entry-level enthusiasts like you, and the lens quality is good!

Those who say that Pentax can't do it are basically keyboard photography enthusiasts, and those who have used it will definitely like it! ）

In addition, don't be obsessed with pixels, pixels are **size, 6 million pixels is a 3000*2000 size**, the improvement of picture quality is almost negligible, and it is completely hyped. The most important thing is the quality of the lens, but also the shooting technique!

Don't buy a double sleeve, especially the one in the back to save a waste of money. Choose D5100 reliable point, 3200 pixels are too high, but with a dog's head, the lens resolution is seriously insufficient, and the film is still relatively pitiful.

Personally, I think you should start with 3200, after all, it's a little newer (time).

Get your hands on the D7000 and promise no regrets.

The lens of the Nikon D700 is a full pair.

Although 24-70 can be used in the frame cutter (D3100, 5100, 7100), it is a bit of a meaning to buy Xiali with 1 million. It doesn't work as well as it should.

The AF-S24-70, one of the big three elements, has a quiet wave motor, and the D3100 5100 can autofocus.

If you are tight, choose the D3200 body.

Absolutely! It's a pity that the 24-70 lens is used in entry-level SLR cameras!

Yes, AFS lenses can be used in almost all digital bodies; AF is the same, but only those with a body motor can autofocus; AFC can also be used, but it can only be metered automatically and set the aperture through the body, and the focus is all manual regardless of the body.

Lenses generally work. Recommend D90, my roommate bought a D3200 and used it for more than a month to sell it.

OK. It's just a bit of a Ferrari engine mounted on a noodle car.