Why is the China Academy of Art Freshman Handbook controversial?

Every university will have its own freshman handbook, which will contain some information about the rules of student conduct and the causes of some of the harms. However, on September 24, some netizens issued a page on the factors of harm in the 2020 freshman safety manual of the China Academy of Art, and the content of it caused controversy among netizens.

The main reason for the controversy in the handbook of the China Academy of Art about the factors that cause harm is that in the first article, the victim is blamed on the victim himself, and it targets women. In the manual, among the factors that cause harm, it is believed that girls pay attention to dressing up, pursue materialism, look beautiful, have no self-defense ability, have less interaction with the outside world, and have poor self-defense awareness, etc., which are the main reasons for their own harm.

The girl was originally a victim of the victim, but it is really unacceptable that the manual of the China Academy of Art attributes the main cause of the victim to the victim. Therefore, many netizens questioned why the factors that caused the incident were mainly attributed to the victim rather than the person who inflicted the harm, and whether there was a suspicion of discrimination against women in schools. Some netizens commented that this ** is still a student handbook, which can be said to be a women's moral handbook.

In response to the doubts of netizens, the school also made corresponding explanations. It is said that this is what the school has concluded in dealing with relevant incidents, and there is no so-called discrimination against women, but it is not considered comprehensively in the process of compilation. The relevant personnel of the school security department said that this content in the manual was a dissuasive content and a kind reminder, and that this incident was caused by insufficient consideration when it was written.

It is very sensitive about the harm of the first time, and it is also very concerned by everyone, and it is inevitable that the student handbook will have heated discussions due to the insufficient compilation of the factors. In the case of harm, it is not only necessary to remind the victim to protect himself, but also to strengthen the education and punishment of the perpetrator.

Because of the question about women's safety knowledge in the freshman handbook, it has raised questions. Blame the problem on the victim himself.

Because in the freshman handbook, they mentioned that the reason why girls were ** was dressed up was because of their own dress, which caused a lot of dissatisfaction among netizens, but in reality, many situations are like this, and everyone must understand the school's intentions.

On September 24, some netizens broke the news that the 2020 "Safety Knowledge Handbook for Freshmen" of the China Academy of Art wrote, "The factors that cause harm are ...... the internal factors of the girls themselves."In this regard, the relevant person in charge of the security department of the China Academy of Art respondedThe handbook was compiled by the Campus Security Department of the China Academy of Art, and was summarized in the process of handling related cases, and is not discriminatory against women, and may not have been underconsidered in the preparation process

For example, the second point "beautiful appearance, frivolous behavior", does not mean that there is a problem with beautiful appearance, but to look at the latter sentence "acting frivolously", that is, you can't be too frivolous in handling things, and it is easy for others to take advantage of loopholes. "It's not that once you encounter this thing (** harm), it must be these factors, but these factors are more common. The relevant person in charge said.

Regarding the netizens' questioning of "why it is all the internal factors of girls, and not the factors of men or perpetrators", the relevant person in charge said that this is our shortcoming, maybe we did not take this into account in the book, and the follow-up will be explained in the freshman safety prevention course, and explained in combination with relevant cases, its content is not discriminatory, and it cannot be taken out of context just by looking at the text.

Flies don't bite seamless eggs, that's the truth.

These are a bit of a victim guilt theory, and the ** charming outfits that girls can wear do not mean that they can be casually light. Everything is found in girls, but they don't fight criminals, and the priorities are reversed.

If some problems arise, the controversial and the divided must work out corresponding measures to solve them.

In fact, there is some truth in the analysis, and there must be a very serious material phenomenon at present, but we cannot generalize from one side to the other, and if there are problems, we must also rely on education to solve them reasonably.

As an institution of higher learning, you should be rigorous in doing things!

It's a bit inappropriate. At the very least, it's like speaking for criminals.

It still feels like there is some truth, but you can't kill everyone with a stick.

Effectton, in Hangzhou, one of my favorite cities.

The six that may be listed are very realistic, they are not strong, and they have no strength at all, right?

I feel that there is nothing wrong with these points, and there are some of the reasons for this.

The school only issued a response, but did not make a remedy, only said that there was no so-called female discrimination, the content was taken out of context, but there was no comprehensive consideration in the process of compilation, and the content in the manual was also some dissuasive and kind reminders.

At present, the school has responded: **The part of the revelation is taken out of context, and the screenshot of** the previous text is conditional, and it is not discriminatory against women, but the school said that it will adjust the content of the manual.

The relevant person in charge of the security office of the China Academy of Art responded that the manual was compiled by the campus security department of the China Academy of Art, and was summarized in the process of handling relevant cases, and did not discriminate against women, and may not have been considered enough in the preparation process. It is understood that this part of the "Safety Knowledge Manual for Freshmen" comes from the safety education textbook "Safety Knowledge Reader for College Students" (10th Edition) organized by the University Security Branch of Zhejiang Higher Education Society. In response, Yang Xiaoming, secretary general of the University Security Branch of the Zhejiang Higher Education Association, responded, "The starting point is to remind female students that the above factors are more likely to become the target of criminals, not to blame the victims."

During our review, we found that some of the expressions were indeed not rigorous enough and will be revised next year. ”

The school has issued a response, the content is taken out of context, there is no discrimination against women at all, and it has been revised, which is also a reminder and advice to women, I personally think it's okay, maybe some people think it's inappropriate.

The Propaganda Department of the school has taken note of this public opinion and will respond to it in a unified manner. However, the reporter contacted the school's propaganda department several times, but did not receive a response by press time, that is, the school has not taken remedial measures so far.