The review steps of the project review and the five necessary steps of the review process

Pre-standing stage. Research phase.

Planning phase. Material aspects assessment phase.

Project Review: As the name suggests, it is about reviewing and approving the project plan.

A step in the evaluation of project changes and work progress. The inputs, steps, and outputs of a project review depend on different scoring types. Different scoring types have different inputs, outputs, processes, and steps. Throughout the project management lifecycle.

, there are usually multiple project reviews.

Working procedures. 1. Registration of the project.

Received from the construction unit.

After the submitted review project information, the data clerk of the evaluation center will classify and register according to the nature of the project, and conduct a preliminary review of the project data.

2. Arrange the review of the project.

According to the specific situation, the director of the investment review center will arrange personnel to review the project. (1) Arrange for the personnel of the Investment Review Center to conduct the review. (2) Entrust an intermediary agency to conduct an audit, and the conclusion of the audit shall be reviewed by the Investment Review Center, and then a report on the audit conclusion shall be issued.

3. The investment reviewers should conduct the review in a serious and responsible manner.

The investment reviewers should carefully read the drawings and materials, and on the basis of full familiarity, go to the construction site where the drawings and materials are not clear.

Field survey, the audit process should focus on the review of the changes and visas, engineering quantities, quota application, and whether the fee standards are true, reasonable and accurate, and the main materials are obtained by inquiry, and the opinions of both parties should be obtained before the audit conclusion is issued, and then the audit conclusion should be issued.

4. The issuance of the project review budget (settlement) account.

According to the audit conclusion issued by the investment reviewers, after the professional auditors of the review center review each other, the director of the center will carefully check and review, sign after confirmation, and report to the bureau leaders for issuance, and finally the review center will seal it. This conclusion serves as the basis for the allocation of funds by the relevant departments.

There are five necessary steps in the review process: the first step, submit the information, the second step, wait for the announcement after the preliminary review of the review agency, the third step, the review agency conducts the review, the fourth step, the review results of the review agency are publicized in the relevant **, and the fifth part receives the title review.

Through documents or certificates.

Management Reviews. It is the top management for the evaluation management system.

The appropriateness of the branch filial piety, adequacy and effectiveness of the activities carried out.

The main content of the management review is that the top management of the organization conducts a formal evaluation of the current situation, suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the management system, as well as the implementation and realization of policies and objectives, and its purpose is to summarize the performance of the management system through this evaluation activity, and to find out the gap with the expected goals from the current performance.

At the same time, any possible opportunities for improvement should be considered, and on the basis of research and analysis, the organization's position in the market and the performance of competitors should be evaluated, so as to find out the direction of their own improvement.

A project review is an important part of managing a project, helping the project team identify and resolve issues in a timely manner to ensure that the project is on schedule. The following is an introduction to the content of the project review.

Project Scope Review.

The project scope review is the first step in the project review, which mainly evaluates and reviews the scope of the project to ensure that the objectives and scope of the project meet the requirements. In the project scope review, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the objectives, needs, feasibility, resource requirements and other aspects of the project to determine whether the feasibility of the project and the feasibility analysis report are true and effective.

Project plan review.

A project plan review is an evaluation and review of the project implementation plan to ensure that the design and implementation of the plan meet the requirements. In the project plan review, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the timeline, milestones, schedule, resource allocation and other aspects of the project to determine whether the plan is reasonable and whether the project objectives can be achieved.

Risk assessment. Risk assessment is the assessment and review of project risks to ensure that the project is able to respond to various risks. In risk assessment, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the risks of the project and formulate coping strategies to reduce the impact of risks on the project.

Quality assessment. Quality assessment is the evaluation and review of the quality of the products or services of the project to ensure that the quality of the products or services meets the requirements. In the quality assessment, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the products or services of the project to determine whether they meet the quality standards and whether they can meet the needs of users.

Cost assessment. Cost assessment is the evaluation and review of project costs to ensure that the cost of the project is controlled within an affordable range. In cost evaluation, the cost of the project needs to be analyzed and evaluated to determine whether it meets the budget and whether it can achieve the expected results.

Project organization evaluation.

The project organization assessment is the evaluation and review of the project team to ensure that the project team has the appropriate competencies and qualities. In the project organization evaluation, it is necessary to analyze and evaluate the ability, quality, communication and collaboration of the project team to determine whether the team has the ability to complete the project.

In conclusion, a project review is an important part of managing a project, which includes the evaluation and review of the project scope, plan, risk, quality, cost, organization, etc., to ensure that the project can proceed as planned and achieve the desired results.

The content of the project review includes the following aspects:

1. Scientificity: Evaluate whether the research methods and theories of the project are scientific and feasible, whether the research content is realistic, and whether the research objectives are original and forward-looking.

2. Feasibility: Evaluate whether the conditions for project implementation are met, whether the research team has the corresponding capabilities and resources, and whether the budget is reasonable and feasible. Leaks.

3. Expected effect: Evaluate whether the project can achieve the expected effect after implementation, and whether it has a promoting effect on academic, technical and other fields.

4. Research plan and time arrangement: Evaluate whether the research plan and time arrangement of the project are reasonable and feasible, and whether there are sufficient resources and manpower support.

5. Staffing and research conditions: Assess whether the staffing and research conditions of the project are in place, and whether further support and help are needed.

6. Budget and use plan: Evaluate whether the budget and use plan of the project are reasonable and feasible, and whether there are sufficient funds to support the implementation of the project.

In the project review, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the above aspects to ensure the quality and implementation of the project.

** Procurement review experts in the review process of illegal interference, shall be reported to the finance, supervision and other departments in a timely manner. Article 41 members of the bid evaluation committee, competitive negotiation team or inquiry team shall, in accordance with the principles of objectivity, impartiality and prudence, conduct independent evaluation in accordance with the evaluation procedures, evaluation methods and evaluation standards specified in the procurement documents. At present, the Ministry of Finance has carried out the follow-up audit of investment projects, as a new thing, and lacks systematic and complete theoretical support.

In the process of practice, exploration, summarization, improvement, development, and improvement, there are different understandings and practices across the country. **There are still many problems in the practice of investment project tracking and auditing, which need to be continuously explored, studied and solved.

Legal basis: Provisions of the People's Republic of China on the Audit of ** Investment Projects

Article 1 In order to further strengthen the audit of investment projects, standardize the audit behavior of investment projects, improve the quality and effectiveness of investment audits, and give full play to the "immune system" function of auditing to ensure the healthy operation of the country's economy and society, these provisions are formulated in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations such as the Audit Law of the People's Republic of China, the Regulations on the Implementation of the Audit Law of the People's Republic of China and the National Auditing Standards of the People's Republic of China.

Article 2 audit institutions on the implementation of the audit and special audit investigation of the first investment and the first investment-based project shall apply to these provisions.

Article 3 audit institutions in accordance with the People's Republic of China Audit Law and the People's Republic of China Audit Law Implementation Regulations and the people's regulations at the same level, to determine the object, scope and content of the audit of investment projects.

Fourth audit institutions shall, in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations, rules and the requirements of the people at the same level and the work arrangements of the higher audit institutions, in accordance with the principle of comprehensive audit, highlight the key points, reasonable arrangements, and ensure quality, determine the annual investment audit project plan. The key investment projects approved by the government at all levels and their development and reform departments shall be used as the key audit institutions for investment audit to carry out the audit of investment projects in accordance with the determined audit jurisdiction to prevent unnecessary duplication of audits.

Fifth audit institutions on the first key investment projects and involving public interests and people's livelihood of urban infrastructure, affordable housing, schools, hospitals and other projects, should focus on the implementation of follow-up audit of its construction and management.

It is not a foundation pit enclosure, of course, the foundation pit construction area must be enclosed, and the enclosure does not need to be demonstrated by experts to be a deep foundation pit support.

It is not a plan review, but a demonstration of a special construction plan for safety, and a demonstration of a 'special plan' that has reached the content scope of Annex II of the construction quality [2009] 87 document "sub-projects with greater risk than a certain scale".

The process of demonstration is clearly stipulated in the article [2009] 87: first, the spirit of the document is thoroughly understood, and according to the content and order specified in the document, the technical person in charge of the project department shall prepare a special safety construction plan according to the actual situation on site, and submit it to the enterprise (company) technology, quality, safety and equipment department for approval, and shall be approved and signed by the chief engineer of the enterprise; Then, according to the provisions of the document, more than five experts from the expert database are invited to demonstrate, and the relevant personnel participating in the meeting shall comply with the provisions of the local housing and urban-rural development commission; After the demonstration is passed, the "plan" shall be revised and improved and then submitted to the enterprise for approval, and after being submitted to the construction party and the director for review and signature, it can be disclosed for implementation, and reported to the safety supervisor for the record before implementation. The expert argumentation is also in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the article [2009] 87.

I am a member of the expert pool, and I have conducted it nearly 200 times, if you have specific questions that you don't understand, please call and answer by name!