The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law Postgraduate examinatio

The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law is complementary, and people with strong subjective initiative will also be stronger in abiding by objective laws.

The relationship between subjective initiative and objective law, we should be based on the law of deduction, then at the same time respect the objective law, give full play to our subjective initiative, this is one of the philosophies. Dialectical relationship, that is, matter determines consciousness, and consciousness has an active effect on matter.

There is a dialectical relationship between my agency and objective laws, and there are many differences between subjective initiative and objective laws.

Active initiative must conform to the objective law, and only by attaching can the objective law become more realistic.

The dialectical relationship between the observation agency and the objective law, the subjective initiative is to complete one thing with your subjective initiative, and the objective law between the objective laws, that is, one thing that has to be done, the relationship between them, one is to take the initiative to complete, and the other is to have to go.

This ancient city must be carried out step by step, in this way, uh, the development of uh four catties is very good.

In fact, this relationship can be analyzed from both subjective and objective perspectives, and it is a dialectical thinking relationship.

Subjective initiative refers to the basic reaction of human beings, which is also the instinctive and natural reaction of human beings. Outcome.

Respecting objective laws is the premise and basis for giving play to subjective initiative, and giving play to subjective initiative is the condition for correctly understanding and utilizing laws.

Only with the help of objective laws can people exert their subjective initiative.

The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective regularity, this can definitely be hated, and the subjective two things need the objective law from whose subjectivity.

The dialectical relationship between active subjective initiative and objective initiative is mainly subjective and supplemented by objectivity.

The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law, then there is a law for me to choose such a person as subjective initiative.

The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law seizure. It's okay to see you go to graduate school like this. Everything has a name. You go.

1. Definition of scope.

Objective regularity refers to the fact that the movement of matter has an objective law that is not subject to human will. Laws are the essential, inevitable, and stable connections inherent in things themselves. Laws are objective, mandatory, intrinsic and conditional.

Subjective initiative is the agency of consciousness.

It refers to the ability of human consciousness to actively understand the world and actively transform the world through guided practice.

2. Dialectical relationship.

The relationship between respecting objective laws and giving play to subjective initiative is dialectical unity.

Target. Respect for objective laws is the objective basis for bringing into play subjective initiative. Because the law is objective, it does not depend on the will of man; Laws are mandatory, and violating objective laws will lead to failure.

Giving play to subjective initiative is the main condition for understanding and applying objective laws. Because the law is intrinsic, only by giving full play to the subjective initiative can we see the essence and grasp the law through the phenomenon; Laws are conditional, and only by giving full play to subjective initiative can we create conditions and make use of laws.

The basis of the dialectical unity of subjective initiative and objective regularity is practice.

Laws are objective and do not depend on people's will, and people can neither create laws nor eliminate laws, but people have subjective initiative in the face of objective laws, and people can recognize and use laws.

1. The exertion of subjective initiative needs to follow objective laws.

2. To follow the objective law, we must pay attention to the play of subjective initiative.

The dialectical relationship between objective regularity and subjective initiative can be regarded as a basic contradiction in philosophy. Objective regularity means that all objective things that exist and develop are governed by certain laws and rules. Over time, these laws and rules undergo different changes and evolutions, and eventually lead to the development and change of the physical world.

Subjective initiative refers to the ability of human beings to change and influence the material world, and to change the objective world through independent will and creativity, especially the development and transformation of human society. Compared with objective regularity, subjective initiative is a more subjective and active factor, which plays a vital role in the progress and development of human society.

The relationship between objective regularity and subjective initiative is a relationship of interaction. To a certain extent, objective regularity affects the exertion of subjective initiative, and the subjective initiative of human beings operates on the basis of objective regularity to a large extent. For example, the development of human society needs to follow some objective laws, such as the continuity of history, the struggle of social contradictions, the development of productive forces and social systems, and so on, all of which exist objectively and are not affected by human will.

However, human beings can accelerate or delay the occurrence of these laws through their own subjective initiative, such as revolutions, wars, wars, reforms, scientific and technological innovations, and so on.

On the other hand, subjective initiative will also have a certain impact on the objective law, Li Shan through human creativity and innovation ability, human beings can discover, create and change the objective law, thereby influencing the development and change of the material world. For example, in the field of science, human beings have discovered many previously unknown natural laws through innovative research methods and science and technology, thus promoting the progress and development of human society.

Generally speaking, objective regularity and subjective initiative are a dialectical relationship, and the two are interdependent and interact, jointly determining and promoting the development and evolution of human society. Objective regularity is the foundation and premise of social development, while subjective initiative is the driving force and guarantee of social change and development. In practice, people need to give full play to their subjective initiative on the basis of clarifying objective laws, and actively promote the progress and development of human society.

The dialectical unity of subjective initiative and objective regulation and unbridled law:

1. Following objective laws is the premise of correctly giving full play to subjective initiative. In order to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and successfully transforming the world, human activities must conform to and act in accordance with objective laws. Otherwise, we will not be able to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and effectively transforming it.

2. Giving full play to subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding and utilizing objective laws. Only by giving full play to the role of subjective initiative in practice can we correctly understand the world and successfully transform the world.

In short, respecting the objective law of fighting and giving full play to the subjective initiative is a process of dialectical unity, and only by respecting the objective law can the subjective initiative be correctly exerted; Only the hand sedan car can give full play to the subjective initiative in order to better follow the objective law.

The objectivity of the law is the main manifestation

First, since we are powerless to change, that is, we cannot create and destroy laws, we must respect its existence and not flout it. This is the first manifestation of the objectivity of the law, that is, the two "cannots": we cannot flout the law, and we cannot create and destroy the law.

Second, since laws exist objectively, and because there are no unknowable things or unknowable things, we can recognize and discover laws and use our understanding of such laws to guide practice. This point is relatively speaking, and more emphasis is placed on how to do it under certain conditions.

Further, it is also possible to change the conditions and forms in which the law works, and this article emphasizes more on creating conditions for the law to serve mankind. But both can serve the same purpose: for the benefit of humanity.

In short, the objectivity of the law is manifested in the following aspects: two "can't" and two "can't".

Correctly understanding the relationship between subjective initiative and objective regularity is an important issue in theory and practice. First of all, it is necessary to respect the objective law, and to give play to people's subjective initiative, it must be premised on acknowledging the objectivity of the law. Second, on the basis of respecting objective laws, we should give full play to our subjective initiative.

Through conscious activities, people can recognize and use the rules. Conscious initiative is an important difference between humans and animals, and respecting the law of the development of things and giving full play to people's subjective initiative are dialectically unified. Practice is the basis for the unity of objective law and subjective initiative.

To correctly bring into play the role of subjective initiative, first of all, proceed from reality and strive to understand and grasp the law of development of things. Second, practice is the basic way to bring into play people's subjective initiative. Finally, the exertion of subjective initiative also depends on certain material conditions and material means.