The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and going with the flow

On the one hand, subjective initiative can change the natural environment and carry out active creation and transformation. This is the active act of human consciousness to transform matter.

On the other hand, the development of nature can react with consciousness and thus act on subjective initiative. Because consciousness is also the objective reaction of human beings to matter, that is, nature.

That's basically the case with dialectical relations.

A thing is waiting for you to solve, in the case of uncertainty, knowing that it is possible to fail after actively working hard, but never give up to strive for it, just do your best, this is your subjective initiative; As for the final result, let it be

Subjectivity has an active nature.

Go with the flow, manifesting as a phenomenon in which an individual subjectively knows something, but does not want to think deeply.

Go with the flow and roughly divide into:

1) The individual found the problem.

2) The individual is unwilling to solve the problem.

3) Use objectivity to "run in" to this problem.

4) God bless Amen

Obviously, the subjective agency is already reflected in the first question, but it is not followed up in the following questions.

Finally, question 4, I may have written a bit funny, but here it can reflect the idealistic idea of "going with the flow".

The above is my opinion.

Work hard as you can.

For example, sometimes a dynasty has run out of energy, and it is not simply planted in the hands of a certain person or the last emperor, and then the subjective initiative seems to be useless, but you can do your best to save it.

Another example is that man will conquer heaven is obviously a fallacy, but it is also not advisable to completely surrender to nature.

In life, sometimes we just need to fight for it, to change the necessities of life, to do as much as we can, to improve as much as we can.

Initiativeand objective lawsDialectical unity

1. Following objective laws is the premise of correctly giving full play to subjective initiative. In order to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and successfully transforming the early realm of the gods, human activities must conform to objective laws and must act in accordance with objective laws. Otherwise, we will not be able to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and effectively transforming it.

2. Giving full play to subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding and utilizing objective laws.

Only by giving full play to the role of subjective initiative in practice can we correctly understand the world and successfully transform the world.

In short, respecting objective laws and giving full play to subjective initiative is a process of dialectical unity, and only by respecting objective laws can we correctly exert subjective initiative. Only by giving full play to subjective initiative can we better follow the objective law.

The objectivity of the law is the main manifestation

First, since we are powerless to change, that is, we cannot create and destroy the law, we must respect its existence and not flout the law. This is the first manifestation of the objectivity of the law, that is, the two "cannot be destroyed": the law cannot be flouted, and the law cannot be created and destroyed.

Second, since laws exist objectively, and because there are no unknowable things or unknowable things, we can recognize and discover laws and use our understanding of such laws to guide practice. This point is relatively speaking, and more emphasis is placed on how to do it under certain conditions.

Further, it is also possible to change the conditions and forms in which the law works, and this article emphasizes more on creating conditions for the law to serve mankind. But both can serve the same purpose: for the benefit of humanity.

In short, the objectivity of the law is manifested in the following aspects: two "can't" and two "can't".

Laws refer to the essential connections and inevitable tendencies inherent in the process of the movement of things. Subjective initiative of consciousness refers to people's practical ability and role in actively understanding the world and actively transforming the world.

A correct understanding of the relationship between subjective initiative and objective regularity is an important issue in both theory and practice. First of all, objective laws must be respected. To give full play to people's subjective initiative, it must be premised on the recognition of the objectivity of the law.

Second, on the basis of respecting objective laws, we should give full play to our subjective initiative.

Through conscious activity, people are able to recognize and use the laws. Conscious agency is an important difference between humans and animals. Respecting the law of the development of things and giving play to people's subjective initiative are dialectically unified. Practice is the basis for the unity of objective regularity and subjective initiative.

Principle-aware activities are purposeful and planned. When people reflect the objective world, they always have a certain purpose and motivation, and they must formulate blueprints, goals, action methods, and action steps in advance before implementing actions. Honey bees nesting, spider webs, etc., on the surface, it may seem that there is some kind of predetermined goal and plan, but in fact, it is not.

They don't know what they're doing or why they're doing it. Their operation is purely an instinctive activity without a purpose.

1. Definition of scope.

Objective regularity refers to the fact that the movement of matter has an objective law that is not subject to human will. Laws are the essential, inevitable, and stable connections inherent in things themselves. Laws are objective, mandatory, intrinsic and conditional.

Subjective initiative is the agency of consciousness.

It refers to the ability of human consciousness to actively understand the world and actively transform the world through guided practice.

2. Dialectical relationship.

The relationship between respecting objective laws and giving play to subjective initiative is dialectical unity.

Target. Respect for objective laws is the objective basis for bringing into play subjective initiative. Because the law is objective, it does not depend on the will of man; Laws are mandatory, and violating objective laws will lead to failure.

Giving play to subjective initiative is the main condition for understanding and applying objective laws. Because the law is intrinsic, only by giving full play to the subjective initiative can we see the essence and grasp the law through the phenomenon; Laws are conditional, and only by giving full play to subjective initiative can we create conditions and make use of laws.

The basis of the dialectical unity of subjective initiative and objective regularity is practice.

Laws are objective and do not depend on people's will, and people can neither create laws nor eliminate laws, but people have subjective initiative in the face of objective laws, and people can recognize and use laws.

1. The exertion of subjective initiative needs to follow objective laws.

2. To follow the objective law, we must pay attention to the play of subjective initiative.

1. To give full play to the subjective initiative should be based on respecting the objective law, everything should be based on reality, and only by starting from the objective reality, grasping the law of the development of things, and following the law of thinking when analyzing and thinking about the first question of the late limbs, can we form a correct consciousness; Only under the guidance of correct consciousness and consciously carrying out actions that conform to objective laws can we take correct actions, and can we achieve the expected goal of transforming the objective world. If anyone completely ignores the objective existence of the material world and its inherent objective laws, he will not only be unable to correctly play the active role of consciousness, but will also be doomed to be punished by the objective laws and achieve nothing. If we do not respect objective laws, for individuals, small ones will suffer setbacks, and big ones will ruin our future.

2. It is necessary to base on the practical activities of materiality, which is the bridge and way for the transformation of matter into consciousness and consciousness into matter, and the material activities that lead to the subjective from the objective and make the subjective visible to the objective. To put it in theoretical language, without practice, people can neither understand objective laws, nor can they make consciousness react on objective things; To put it in plain and layman's terms, if you don't do it, you can't know what things look like, and no matter how many great ideas you have in your head, they are just utopian dreams and will never change reality.

3. On the premise of affirming that matter determines consciousness, we should recognize and give full play to the active role of consciousness in matter.

Summary. Hello, The realization of the harmonious coexistence of man and nature requires the help of the dialectical unity relationship between subjective initiative and objective law. First of all, it is necessary to grasp the objective law, and on this basis, grasp the connection between man and nature, and grasp the relationship between man and nature, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature.

Secondly, it is necessary to give full play to the subjective initiative, so as to grasp the relationship between man and nature, and grasp the connection between man and nature, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. Finally, it is necessary to combine objective regularity and subjective initiative to grasp the relationship between man and nature, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature.

According to the dialectical unity between subjective initiative and objective law, please talk about how to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature.

Hello, The realization of the harmonious coexistence of man and nature requires the help of the dialectical unity relationship between subjective initiative and objective law. First of all, it is necessary to grasp the objective law, and on this basis, grasp the connection between man and nature, and grasp the relationship between man and self-finger blindness, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. Secondly, it is necessary to give full play to the subjective initiative, so as to grasp the relationship between man and nature, and grasp the connection between man and nature, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature.

Finally, it is necessary to combine objective regularity and subjective initiative to grasp the relationship between man and nature, so as to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature.

In order to realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature, we need to take the following measures: 1. Strengthen the protection of natural resources and strengthen the effective use of natural resources to reduce the damage to nature; 2. Strengthen environmental protection and strengthen the control of environmental pollution to reduce the damage to nature; 3. Strengthen the construction of ecological civilization and strengthen the construction of ecological culture to reduce the damage to nature; 4. Strengthen the conservation of biodiversity and strengthen the protection of biodiversity to reduce the damage to nature; 5. Strengthen resource conservation and strengthen the implementation of resource conservation to reduce the damage to nature.

The dialectical relationship.

1.Respecting objective laws is the prerequisite for giving full and effective play to subjective initiative. The law is objective, it is not subject to human will, it can neither be created nor destroyed.

The existence and functioning of laws are not subject to human will. The objectivity of the law is the first nature, and the subjective initiative is the second nature.

Target. The objectivity of laws restricts people's subjective initiative.

2.Giving play to subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding and mastering objective laws.

In the face of objective laws, man is not powerless. On the basis of understanding and grasping the laws, people can use the laws according to the conditions and forms in which the laws take effect, transform the objective world, and benefit mankind. Understanding the law is inseparable from the exertion of people's subjective initiative.

In the same way, the use of laws to transform the objective world is also inseparable from the exertion of people's subjective initiative.

In the process of practice, people will inevitably encounter the relationship between objective laws and subjective initiative. Objective regularity is the essential, inevitable, and stable connection in the development of the movement of things, that is, the law is objective, and its existence does not depend on human consciousness. It is not subject to human will.

Subjective initiative, also known as conscious initiative, refers to the unique ability of human beings to understand purposeful, planned, and active activities in the world.

First of all, it is necessary to respect the objective law, and to give play to people's subjective initiative, it must be premised on acknowledging the objectivity of the law.

Second, on the basis of respecting the objective regularity of divination, it is necessary to give full play to subjective initiative.

In the process of following and transforming things, if people want to achieve the desired results, they must properly handle the relationship between the two, that is, the relationship between the dialectical unity of objective law and subjective initiative. Only by respecting the law can people give better play to their subjective initiative. The more profound and comprehensive people's understanding of objective laws is, the more fully their subjective initiative will be brought into play.

If you violate the objective law, you will be punished by it. This is the principle of the idiom, which is what the seedlings are talking about. The anxious Song people pulled them out of the land in order to make the rice grow faster, but these violated the law of development of things themselves, and the rush to achieve results finally outweighed the losses.

The correct approach should be to follow the laws of nature, water and fertilize the rice during the natural production cycle, and take good care of it and care for its growth, so that a good harvest can be achieved.

In the final analysis, Marxist philosophy is a philosophy of struggle between man and things. Objective regularity and subjective initiative are a kind of manifestation. Objective regularity is the end of things to people, and subjective initiative is the breakthrough of people to things.

Let's take an example from an economic point of view: Suppose A wants to start a company. In this, a must follow the end of economic laws, such as the law of value, which is called objective law.

The subjective initiative of A lies in the premise of abiding by the law of value, more important and leaky, balance management, efficiency, product quality, service level, etc. All of this requires subjective initiative. It should be noted that people can rebel against the constraints of material laws through the exertion of initiative, which is only a rebellion, and cannot truly break through and subvert.

In fact, only by fully understanding the law and respecting the objective law can we give better play to people's initiative. If you play casually, you will either hit a wall or be punished by the law. This is the relationship between objective regularity and subjective initiative.

In the process of practice, people's conscious activities are governed by laws, and whether people recognize it or not, admit it or not, it objectively exists and works in a certain way. Man is not powerless in the face of the law, and man can give full play to his subjective initiative, and on the basis of understanding and grasping the law, he can use the law according to the conditions and forms in which the law takes effect, so as to transform the objective world and benefit mankind.