Are subjective initiative and materialism contradictory?

First of all, we are dialectical materialism, and we recognize the agency of consciousness on the basis of the firm primacy of matter.

The two are not contradictory, the law is objective, such as the law of nature, mathematical theorems, but the objective existence of the law must rely on human subjective initiative to grasp and understand, such as designing experiments, proving theorems, only a comprehensive understanding of the law, in order to better act according to the law.

The law is like a tool, but it is still people who pick up tools to do things, how to do things completely according to the law itself needs to exert subjective initiative, of course, whether the subjective initiative is fully exerted in many times can not affect the development of things, even if people have to obey the law.

The so-called Cultural Revolution was subjective and contrary to objective reality.

1. You may not have learned the lesson of correctly using people's subjective initiative.

Human agency includes: thinking, doing, and the mental state of thinking and doing.

Think: It is to understand the subjective and objective worlds.

Do: It is to transform the objective world.

Mental state: lazy, strong. Energetic.

Thinking correctly will guide you to do it right, and mental state plays an important role in this process. Wrong on the contrary.

2. Materialism: The essence of the world is matter, matter determines consciousness, consciousness reacts to matter, and right promotes the obstacle of error. Therefore, we are required to proceed from reality in everything we do and act according to objective laws.

3. In addition, due to the constraints of the objective environment and laws, as well as subjective factors (outlook on life, world view, knowledge composition, depth and breadth of stance, participation in practice, etc.) and the times, people cannot always correctly develop their subjective initiative. A person with low quality, low level of education, and a very selfish person will not be able to grasp the inner laws of things and use the laws as a guide to correctly display his initiative.

4 Materialism is the primacy of conformity to matter. If we know the objective law, and do not shine the subjective initiative in thinking, doing, and a good mental state, then understanding can only be understanding, and we cannot do homework.

5. The dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law

1. People should fully develop their subjective initiative to understand the law.

2. The correct exertion of subjective initiative should be guided by laws.

3. Only by combining law with subjective initiative can we transform the world well.

Forgive me.

Initiativeand objective lawsDialectical unity

1. Following objective laws is the premise of correctly giving full play to subjective initiative. In order to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and successfully transforming the early realm of the gods, human activities must conform to objective laws and must act in accordance with objective laws. Otherwise, we will not be able to achieve the goal of correctly understanding the world and effectively transforming it.

2. Giving full play to subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding and utilizing objective laws.

Only by giving full play to the role of subjective initiative in practice can we correctly understand the world and successfully transform the world.

In short, respecting objective laws and giving full play to subjective initiative is a process of dialectical unity, and only by respecting objective laws can we correctly exert subjective initiative. Only by giving full play to subjective initiative can we better follow the objective law.

The objectivity of the law is the main manifestation

First, since we are powerless to change, that is, we cannot create and destroy the law, we must respect its existence and not flout the law. This is the first manifestation of the objectivity of the law, that is, the two "cannot be destroyed": the law cannot be flouted, and the law cannot be created and destroyed.

Second, since laws exist objectively, and because there are no unknowable things or unknowable things, we can recognize and discover laws and use our understanding of such laws to guide practice. This point is relatively speaking, and more emphasis is placed on how to do it under certain conditions.

Further, it is also possible to change the conditions and forms in which the law works, and this article emphasizes more on creating conditions for the law to serve mankind. But both can serve the same purpose: for the benefit of humanity.

In short, the objectivity of the law is manifested in the following aspects: two "can't" and two "can't".

Laws refer to the essential connections and inevitable tendencies inherent in the process of the movement of things. Subjective initiative of consciousness refers to people's practical ability and role in actively understanding the world and actively transforming the world.

A correct understanding of the relationship between subjective initiative and objective regularity is an important issue in both theory and practice. First of all, objective laws must be respected. To give full play to people's subjective initiative, it must be premised on the recognition of the objectivity of the law.

Second, on the basis of respecting objective laws, we should give full play to our subjective initiative.

Through conscious activity, people are able to recognize and use the laws. Conscious agency is an important difference between humans and animals. Respecting the law of the development of things and giving play to people's subjective initiative are dialectically unified. Practice is the basis for the unity of objective regularity and subjective initiative.

Principle-aware activities are purposeful and planned. When people reflect the objective world, they always have a certain purpose and motivation, and they must formulate blueprints, goals, action methods, and action steps in advance before implementing actions. Honey bees nesting, spider webs, etc., on the surface, it may seem that there is some kind of predetermined goal and plan, but in fact, it is not.

They don't know what they're doing or why they're doing it. Their operation is purely an instinctive activity without a purpose.

1.Objective laws refer to the essential connections and inevitable tendencies inherent in the process of the movement of things. The law is objective, not subject to human will, it can neither be created nor destroyed.

Initiative

It refers to the practical ability and role of people to actively understand the world and actively transform the world. Man is not powerless in the face of the law, and man can give full play to his subjective initiative to use the law according to the conditions and forms in which the law takes effect, so as to transform the objective world and benefit mankind on the basis of understanding and grasping the law.

2.Respecting objective laws is the premise and basis for giving play to subjective initiative, and only by respecting objective laws can we give better play to people's subjective initiative. The more profound and comprehensive people's understanding of objective laws is, the more fully their subjective initiative can be brought into play.

If you violate the objective law, you will be punished by it.

Bringing into play people's subjective initiative is a necessary condition for understanding, mastering, and utilizing objective laws.

Because objective laws are hidden inside things. In order to correctly understand the world, it is necessary to transform the world through practice, rely on the exertion of subjective initiative, and use objective laws.

Respecting objective laws and giving play to people's subjective initiative are complementary and dialectically unified.

Target. It is necessary not only to respect objective laws, but also to bring into play people's subjective initiative and uphold materialism.

and dialectics are organically unified.

3.The principle of the dialectical relationship between subjective initiative and objective law tells us that when thinking about problems and doing things, we should not only respect the objective law and act according to the law, but also give full play to our subjective initiative and organically combine respect for objective law with subjective initiative.

In addition, we must oppose one-sided exaggeration of people's subjective initiative, denial of the objectivity of laws, and idealism of blind and brutal action.

Mistake; It is also necessary to oppose one-sided exaggeration of the objectivity of laws, ignoring people's subjective initiative, and mechanical materialism of inaction.

Mistake; <>

Subjective initiative has two meanings: one is that people actively understand the objective world; Second, under the guidance of understanding, we should actively transform the objective world. On the basis of practice, the two are unified, that is, the subjective initiative of people is different from things.

Giving full play to subjective initiative is of decisive significance for people to understand and transform the world successfully and unsuccessfully under certain conditions. On the premise of respecting objective laws, the more people grasp objective laws, the more they will be able to give full play to their subjective initiative.

Discernment question: Emphasizing subjective initiative will inevitably lead to idealism.

Answer: (1) This view is one-sided (1 point).

2) Dialectical materialism believes that matter determines consciousness, and consciousness has an implicit and active effect on matter. To understand and apply the law, we must bring into play people's subjective initiative, and to give play to our subjective initiative, we must respect the objective law as the premise. (2 points).

3) Give full play to subjective initiative and act according to objective laws. On the basis of respecting objective laws, emphasizing the exertion of subjective initiative will not lead to idealism, but is the inherent requirement of dialectical materialism. (3 points).

4) If we violate the objective law and one-sidedly emphasize the role of subjective initiative, the exertion of subjective initiative may become a kind of arbitrary behavior, and we will encounter failure in understanding and transforming the world. At this time, it fell into the nuclear bridge idealistic stove shedism. (3 points).

Subjective initiative refers to people's active influence on the external environment and the realization of their goals based on their own understanding, judgment and action. It emphasizes the subjective status of people, that is, people can change the external environment through their will. Subjective idealism, on the other hand, emphasizes that inner feelings have a decisive effect on objective things, and regards them as an insurmountable limit.

That is, everything is determined by our inner feelings, and we cannot change the external environment.