How to tactfully point out the shortcomings of others?

Pointing out the shortcomings of others, the risk of this thing itself is extremely high, you have to think about it:

What kind of words and attitudes to use to point out the shortcomings of others;

How they will respond to you;

These two points are difficult to think about, and they will involve the point of "whether the party can be a person, whether he can speak, whether he is educated, whether his emotional intelligence is high enough" and so on. In addition, it will also involve the respondent's "whether it has the ability to introspect, whether it is tolerant enough, whether it is open-minded, whether it knows whether it knows how to change if there is one, and if there is none, it will be encouraged" and so on.

So, what exactly is your relationship with the other person?

If you point out their shortcomings very bluntly, will they accept it? If so, then if you adjust the wording a little, it can be considered a "tact", and it will not cause damage to your relationship by pointing out their shortcomings.

If you have ever had a quarrel over something like this, I believe that no matter how careful you are and how tactful you are, they will not think that you are "pointing out their shortcomings", but that you are attacking them.

Then, considering that the desire to "tactfully point out" may turn into a slurred or incomprehensible word, it will cause unnecessary misunderstandings.

Considering that if you say it bluntly, the possibility of others not being able to accept it is extremely high, and it is likely to eventually turn into a fierce quarrel, pointing out the shortcomings of others, whether it is tactful or not, I will weigh it again and again until I am completely sure, otherwise I will choose to swallow this word for the time being.

Tactfully point out the shortcomings of others, then you can praise them for what they have done well, and then talk about their shortcomings, then the other party will be more receptive to your correction.

There is no need to take the initiative to say the other person's shortcomings, unless the other person asks you what his own shortcomings are, and you can use yourself as an example to express it tactfully.

Let's take someone else's story, who can say who has what kind of shortcomings, and what bad things have happened as a result? Then you can't. A side reminder.

Don't use evil words, use clever words. When we point out the shortcomings of others, others will definitely be unhappy, at least embarrassed, so don't use bad words, such as "you see what's wrong with you", "it's not right for you to do this", "can you do anything" are more hurtful words, should be clever words, at least tactful, say "what should we do", "how to do this", "I'll help you", these are more acceptable.

Put yourself in the shoes of others. It was already embarrassing to be pointed out as a shortcoming. If you still use very sharp language, it will be even more unacceptable, and maybe it will get worse, which requires us to think about whether we can accept what we are going to say when we point out the shortcomings of others, that is, what will happen to you when someone points out your shortcomings like this, and then modify your own language according to reality.

Sit quietly and think about your own mistakes, and don't talk about others in your spare time. Don't always point out the shortcomings of others under the banner that I am for his good, know that we are also imperfect, although the shortcomings of others have reached the point where we can no longer bear them, we still have to think about the consequences of saying it, and whether you can pay others, if not, it is best to ask them to correct themselves through other means.

Counteract the good with the inferior, and persuade with good words. When talking about the shortcomings of others, first talk about the advantages of others, and tell him that you **** is good, but it will be better if you change ****. I think others will slowly correct it in private.

Get along with each other, subtly. Don't shout and point out the shortcomings of others at the beginning, but when you find the shortcomings of others, first see if you are like this, if you are not like this, then subtly make others find their own shortcomings and correct themselves.

How to euphemistically point out the shortcomings? You can only say it in a joke, not in a serious way.

Here's how to describe your shortcomings subtly and tactfully:

1. Treat the work not proactive enough, only satisfied with completing the tasks assigned by the leader, encounter problems in the work, not good at thinking, use your brain, often wait for the leader's instructions, and say step by step. Lack of a sense of professionalism, thinking that some of the business knowledge I have can adapt to the current work, although I feel potential pressure and urgency, but lack of self-confidence, lack of courage to climb up and perseverance in studying hard and perseverance in the spirit and attitude of learning.

2. Execution ability: the implementation of the work is lacking, the exception is to encounter cumbersome and complex things in the work, with the mentality of being able to procrastinate, not today, just wait for tomorrow to say, to take the method of avoiding the problem, not to seek solutions to the self, but to wait for the way to appear.

3. Lack of work experience, too impatient to deal with problems, bent on doing something and making some achievements, but lack of overall planning, not careful and thorough work, and the ways and means of work also need to be further guided and improved by leading colleagues.

4. For the tasks assigned by the leader, he is anxious, not capable enough, not comprehensive enough, not profound enough, although he can basically complete the tasks assigned by his superiors, but he also feels powerless to deal with difficulties and pressure in his work, and lacks motivation to work.

5. The overall awareness is not strong enough. Sometimes doing things and doing work only from oneself, some of the major decisions made by the company and the workshop do not understand thoroughly, although the work to be done according to the requirements of the leader, there are still some other ideas in the psychology. There are still situations where you see, hear, think, but have not yet done it, and you need to further enhance your dedication and sense of responsibility.

6. Business learning: the learning momentum is not enough. I am used to learning what I use, learning a little today and learning that tomorrow, and as a result, I understand everything, I am not good at anything, and the knowledge I have learned is not systematic and thorough.

The importance and awareness of learning is not put into action. The perseverance and perseverance to learn one line and one line of fine work are not enough.

7. Sometimes the idea of dealing with problems is not clear enough, which makes the work more passive; There is also a lack of enterprising and innovative work in the work, and the ability to coordinate needs to be strengthened.

Euphemisms for evaluating people's shortcomings.

Euphemisms for evaluating people's shortcomings. People are not saints, they will make mistakes in their work, and it is normal to have shortcomings, I believe that everyone has had the experience of doing something wrong, when criticizing others, pay attention to the tone and retain the self-esteem of others. Let's talk about euphemisms for evaluating people's shortcomings.

Sentences to evaluate a person's shortcomings:

1. The thinking is not mature enough, and the ability to link theory with practice is weak.

2. If you pay too much attention to the details in your daily work, you may neglect the grasp of the whole.

3. Lack of experience in dealing with people.

4. Less work experience and further training is needed.

5. Sometimes I think too much about some things.

6. Do not have a deep understanding of the basic knowledge of the profession and need further study.

7. The work style is too restrained and not bold enough.

Criticism is not a party, and it is best to keep it to a minimum. Being criticized is not a glorious thing, and no one wants to have a "press conference" when they are criticized. Therefore, for the sake of the "face" of the critic, when criticizing, it is necessary to avoid the presence of a third party as much as possible.

Don't leave the door wide open, don't shout loudly, as if the whole world knows. At such times, the more "gentle" your tone is, the more acceptable it will be.

Euphemism about someone else's shortcomings can be done in the following ways:

1.Take your own experience as an example: When pointing out the shortcomings of others, you can cite your own experience or examples, which will allow you to express your own opinions more vividly and at the same time make the other person understand better.

2.To put it another way: when expressing someone else's shortcomings, you can use more euphemistic expressions such as "I think this can be handled better", "I think it can be improved here", etc.

3.Use interrogative sentences: You can use interrogative sentences to express your opinions, such as "Do I think there is something that can be improved here?" This allows the other person to think on their own and express their opinions more tactfully.

4.Prepare answers in advance: When pointing out the shortcomings of others, you can think about the other person's reaction and prepared plan in advance to avoid embarrassing situations.

Either way, you need to pay attention to your tone and attitude, and be objective and respectful, so that the other person can better accept your point of view.

Personally, I think that this kind of thing still refers to filial piety only to look at people's dishes, rather than blindly saying that the shortcomings of others are simplified, only the other party is very shrewd, even if you say it euphemistically? It's not that he doesn't understand? Who wants to hear that?

Question 1: When you talk about other people's shortcomings, is it a joke or a mockery? Laughing, of course.

Question 2: How to euphemistically say the shortcomings of others, 100 words If it is a boss to a subordinate, praise it first and then point it out;

If it is a colleague, I usually do not point out his shortcomings, after all, this shortcoming is not formed in a day or two, and he carries this shortcoming with him.

After living and working for so long, who can be without some shortcomings!

If it's a friend, I'll point it out when he makes a mistake.

Hope Question 3: What are the more euphemistic words to describe people's shortcomings? Seeing profit and forgetting righteousness, selfishness, valuing color and ignoring friends, having a high eye and a low hand, being too ambitious, and having a strong sense of vanity.

Question 4: How to be tactful when someone says about their own shortcomings If the shortcomings are real, to avoid embarrassment, you can laugh at yourself and say that you know this, but you can't change it, and ask him for advice on how to correct it. If the flaw is false, and he spreads rumors, you can sarcastically mock him, I don't know what I'm like, you know, you're really a roundworm in my stomach, and so on.

Question 5: Describe shortcomings Euphemism If you hate someone very much, how to express it tactfully Our heads are quite pointy.

So... Don't fall in love.

We are the two poles.

So repel each other ...

Question 6: How to tactfully evaluate a person's shortcomings Don't talk about his shortcomings directly, you can say that he is good in other aspects to contrast his bad in some aspects, and the most common thing to use is to say that his advantages in opposition to that shortcoming are not outstanding.

For example, he is too lazy, and the advantage of the opposite is diligence, you can Zhao Peixin to say, "XX people are good in all aspects, if they are more industrious, it will be perfect......”

That's pretty much it.

Question 7: I am poor in eloquence, not good at getting along with others, poor in communication skills, how to euphemistically express these shortcomings? Isn't it bad to say bluntly? There are three forms of general euphemism:

Euphemism: Don't use plain words such as "poor ability", "bad", "lacking", etc. Moderate words such as "not particularly prominent", "there is still room for improvement", and "can be further improved" are used.

Kill two birds with one stone: Don't just say what is bad, but say what is better. In terms of diluting the bad side, there is also a bonus effect. Such as:

a I am stronger in independent thinking, receptivity, and efficiency, while interpersonal communication is more tender.

killing two birds with one stone, not only praising himself, but also euphemistically expressing his own shortcomings. ）

b I think your seniors are much better than me in many aspects, especially in dealing with the world.

kills two birds with one stone, not only praising each other, but also euphemistically expressing their own shortcomings. ）

Question 8: Euphemistically write at least four of other people's shortcomings, 50 words each The injuries of both parties have not healed yet, she has decided to break up, no matter how much you care about it now, it is just an interruption to her, let time go **, maybe after a long time, the two of you can sit down to eat and chat together like friends.