I heard from a friend that the Sony camera is bad for shooting night scenes Will the Sony F3K be bad

Many people's impression of the Sony NEX is still the first generation 3 and 5, at that time there were indeed a lot of problems, and the high feeling was not good, but when it came to the NEX-5N, the progress was amazing, and it was very good to shoot night scenes.

This is the same as many people's impression of Canon and Nikon is still stuck in the era of film machines, saying that Nikon is sharp and Canon is soft, in fact, it is reversed in the digital age, but it cannot be generalized, D800E is very sharp, very different from other models, D800 is softer. The key is the internal filters and processing, which affect more than the lens.

J1 is not available, poor imaging, if you like Nijia, you have to wait for its new model, not now, but it will definitely improve in the future. So the question of whether you buy a set or not doesn't have to be.

Orribus's E410,510 entry SLR is particularly poor,Some people say that Olympus is not effective at all,But now there is no bad micro mirror,OM-D is even more amazing。 The world is changing.

The opposite change is Panasonic, in the past Panasonic's small numbers were the best, and now some of the new models have become very bad.

It is not possible to generalize whether the night view is bad or not.

F3 is the bottom of the 5N, the high sense is very good, with a large aperture lens, the night scene will be very good.

Nikon J1 does not seem to be a good choice for mirrorless at the moment, the image quality is very average, not as good as RX100, and the volume is much larger.

The recommended answer is very correct, the F3 night view ability is very good.

Sony's mirrorless image quality is currently incomparable to other homes, and the sensor size can also be illustrated. The score given by foreign evaluation stations Sony F3 is the same as that of Nikon SLR D90, which is comparable to the mid-range SLR, which is enough to show the strength of this mirrorless. The Sony's high sense is also quite good, and the handheld night scene is not bad.

Of course, it's best to have a prime lens with a large aperture, or use a tripod.

Although the image quality of Nikon 1 is not as good as that of Sony, it is also directly related to the size of the sensor. However, the positioning of Nikon 1 and Sony is different, and there is a lot of difference, not that there is not much comparability between competing products. The Nikon 1 is the smallest mirrorless and has the fastest focusing speed, and the unique 60 frames per second continuous shooting and slow-motion photography are all advantages of the Nikon 1.

Nikon 1 person feels that there is no need for a long lens, and after matching it, it loses the advantage of being compact.

1. All the landlords because you don't know how to use the reason, if you don't know how to shoot skills, even if you give you a SLR, it's useless, my own card machine can still shoot night scenes, the effect is brighter than the naked eye.

Shooting static night scenes requires a high ** (i.e., a long shutter speed), which is generally fixed (such as with a tripod). (1 sec-8 sec).

If it is a dynamic night scene, you can only sacrifice the quality as much as possible and adjust it to a high ISO mode.

However, no matter how high the ISO is, if there is no good light source, there is no good light source at a shutter speed of 1 16 seconds or less.

If you don't consider the portability to buy a SLR, you will buy a SLR, and the portability that the mirrorless focuses on will definitely reduce the performance. Girls, if you don't plan to play all the time, just for daily use, about 4000 to buy Pentax K-R or K-X, 18 55mm lens set about 4200 or so is very affordable.

SLR is good, Canon 500d4000-8000 yuan depends on what lens you have with, sister, it is equipped with an 18-55mm EX lens of more than 400 grams light.

I bought an Ixus machine that Karen Mok advertises on, and I feel good about it. Less than 3000

In F3K, "K" refers to the E18-55 OSS lens kit that comes standard on the fuselage, which means that the lens is already included.

For ordinary household use, the E18-55 lens is sufficient.

The lenses that come with the set are generally sufficient.

I wanted to buy a milkshake 5, but the milkshake 6 might be coming out soon, I'm waiting, and now boycott Japanese products, suggestion, etc.

It must be a special lens for Sony, buy a telephoto, buy a wide angle, buy a fixed focus, it's enough.

Boycott Japanese products! Please don't buy a small Japanese camera!

It's definitely not as good as the 5N, let alone the NEX6 and NEX7.

5N or NEX6 is recommended

Basically, 1855 is the most entry-level lens, don't expect too much from it for the best shooting effect, if you want a better effect, you still have to change to a higher high-end one. For example, the 18-200 is good, and it is a universal lens.

The texture of the fuselage is not strong, and the machine feels a little bigger. It is recommended to buy 5R directly.

Mirrorless, to be honest: the biggest point is that it is lightweight, fast, the imaging is acceptable, and the scenery is more brilliant at a small aperture.

If you use portraits or large landscapes, the gap between the DSLR and the DSLR is still not small.

The micro-orders with a price difference of more than 1,000 yuan are almost the same, and some micro-orders are expensive, mainly with some gimmicks.

DSLR and mirrorless, I am currently using both.

It's not so old.

Not as good as the 5N, let alone the NEX6 and NEX7

Let's talk about Samsung's machine first,Let's talk about the advantages of this machine itself is more entertaining,,This machine is good in appearance, there are more color choices,The pixels are higher,Disadvantages,Samsung's own SLR or optics are not very good,There is also a gap between the sensor and Sony (Nikon sensor is provided by Sony),The lens peripheral product line of mirrorless is not as complete as Sony。

Samsung is now more of a new concept experimenter in the camera (it can be understood that he can't squeeze in the old system), wifi, touch screen, including the recently released Android system camera, you can try it out, not necessarily the photo effect is excellent.

The F3 is a very good machine, the sensor used is the same as the 5N 5R, and it is said that the imaging effect of the F3 is slightly stronger than that of the 5N 5R.

F3 doesn't seem to be worthy of a 16-50 head, it should be because of the early listing time, and now it's all 5R with 16-50In comparison, 18-55 is only slightly larger, and I personally feel that the effect can be slightly stronger than that of 16-50.

The problem of external flash, F3 comes with flash, but the 5R of the same door is an external flash, and they are all sent.

This can't be said to be externally connected,It can only be said that the fuselage can no longer be installed before flashing outside,And the effect of the flash that is distributed by the general production is almost the same,It can't be said that the external one is better。 And from a practical point of view, the external one is easy to lose (I just saw an NX1000 saying that it was lost in the external flash, and it should be equipped with a sub-factory.) How can this thing be two or three hundred from the original factory), two will be one more piece on it, uncoordinated, three, the socket is used too much into the ash is also a problem, you say yes.

Moreover, the F3 also has a smart interface (above the fuselage), which is also expandable.

In fact, if it's really true,We're all amateur level,The film is really not so serious,If it's home,Entertainment,Samsung is not bad,If you think you like photography,Study technology,Make a good film,Maybe you will invest some money in photography in the future,It is recommended to F3,After all, the lens product line is much richer。

The best picture quality of about 3,000 mirrorless is PentaxK01,There is no dispute,But there are some problems with focusing,It's not very suitable to shoot children who love to move.。

Sony NEX series mirrorless except for the first generation of NEX-3 and NEX-5 is not good, everything else is good, in other words, the Sony mirrorless that is still on sale is a good thing, as long as you choose the most suitable one, although the more expensive the better.

Samsung's mirrorless imaging has improved a lot, but the high sensitivity (high ISO) is very poor, and if you want to take photos indoors without flash, Samsung will not be able to complete the task successfully.

The best Olympus mirrorless is OM-D EM5, the high-sensitivity photography effect exceeds all low-end SLRs, close to the full frame, but unfortunately**too high. EPL-5 is a simplified version of it, which should be good, but ** is still high. The most cost-effective of all mirrorless devices is the Olympus EPL-1, which is of high quality and low price, and has now been discontinued.

Panasonic's micro-single camera effect is good, and the photo is not effective.

So, realistically speaking, you still buy Sony NEX and pay attention to choosing a new 16-50 head, beautiful and pocket-sized, the original 18-55 is too long and top-heavy.

First of all, I recommend the Sony NEX 5N 18-55 set, now about 3300, the same level of image quality is outstanding, the function is good, and it is also very lightweight, the image sensor of APS-C ISO3200 JPG is directly available, and the set also sends a flash.

The F3 is also an APS-C component, and the image quality is slightly worse than the 5N, and it is much thicker and heavier, so it is better to buy the 5N

In the case of the Samsung NX1000, the color depth, latitude and high sensitivity noise control are not as good as the Sony 5N F3, and the difference between 16 million pixels and 21 million pixels is not much in the case of home use.

X10 is not very recommended, one is that the frame and mirrorless ratio is too small, and RAW is only more than 6 million with other software, and the excess may be Fuji interpolation.

EPL3 and GF5 are similar, they are both machines of the M4 3 camp, the image quality is also half a catty, and the noise control is not as good as that of NX1000 and NEX 5N and NEX F3, but better than X10. If it's EPL5, the image quality is much better. EPL3 and GF5If you want to choose, just choose one that you like, and if you have a lot of portraits, you can also buy a 20 This lens shoots portraits, the background blur highlights the subject very well, and it is very tasteful, but according to the actual use, the focus is slower than Sony's mirrorless.

For details of image quality, you can refer to the camera sensor inside, and you can see the evaluation scores and reference total scores for the performance of each camera sensor.

In addition, it is best not to use flash when shooting children under the age of three, which is very damaging to the child's eyesight, in this case, it is necessary to focus on high ISO performance or buy a large aperture prime lens.

Micro is a new species, just three or four years of appearance, update and eliminate soon It is recommended that the landlord do not have to worry about the so-called technical parameters, just like it, the product is bought to increase our interest in life, not to increase troubles

Specific to the model to buy to see what you like, the lens is recommended to go 18-200 one shot around the world If you are still entangled, see the link below

Good luck

Or Sony's nex series,Sony's strength is in electronics,Reflected in the camera, it is multi-functional, easy to operate,Suitable for home use,For example, night scene and panoramic function,You don't need to have any foundation.,Think of it.,You can't use it yourself when you buy the machine.,It's more obvious when your wife uses it.。 There is also the machine that everyone chooses, indicating that there are no serious defects, and in the future, if you want to change the machine after playing deeply, it is easy to sell second-hand.

In terms of pixels, the NX1000 is more powerful (unless the flush is large** useful) but in terms of high sensitivity, the F3 wins, especially pay attention to one point: the NX1000 set of lenses has no image stabilization (20-50), the F3 set of 18-55 optical image stabilization, the wide angle is larger, and the lens is also magnesium aluminum alloy. Although the power of the so-called external flash is slightly larger, it has not fundamentally changed, and the 180-degree flip screen of F3 is convenient for multi-angle shooting and videography.

Finally, the core is in terms of color reproduction and accuracy, Sony's independent photosensitive vitality + processor is incomparable with Samsung, and it is also impossible for a layman to do so. Panasonic's GF5 is a 4 3 system, the size of the photosensitive components is slightly smaller, and the CMOS color reproduction of Panasonic's photosensitive components is also not good, you can consider Olympus EPM1, in summary, it is still 3 The strength is the strongest. ps:

Fujifilm X10 is a very good machine,Whether it's high sensitivity or lens quality,If you don't change the lens in the future, choose X10,There are not many people who understand it.

Let's talk about the picture quality. Carefully consider the functions you need and then slowly eliminate the machines you don't need, this kind of selective problem is very personal, and you still have to rely on your own consideration. Flash, I think it's very necessary for me personally.

It is used in many cases, but it is not very good for freebies. However, if you have a budget of about 3000 yuan, I personally recommend Canon 1100D, SLR, there is also an automatic semi-automatic mode, the reputation is good, the landlord will not feel anything when he first starts to play photography, and you will find that you need a SLR very much later. Although it is entry-level, the picture quality is definitely not inferior to that of mirrorless and single batteries at the same price.

This matter needs to be considered by the landlord, and it will be too hasty to spend the money in vain.

It's also all APS format, Samsung NX1000 pixels are higher, Samsung NX1000 is better than Sony NEX-F3K I don't know how many times more cost-effective.

J1 can be ignored, the bottom is too small, and the lens is also less. I prefer the EPL5, and the focus and high-sensitivity improvements are still quite obvious, but ** exceeds the budget a lot. Pentax's K01 has a large bottom, and is compatible with Pentax SLR lenses, focusing is not slow, and now it is very cost-effective, with a set of less than 3000, which is enough for daily use.