-
Anonymous users2024-02-15The Tamron A16 is still good in terms of color performance and sharpness, but because there is no ultrasonic motor, the dark part is very difficult to diagonal, hesitant or not right.
Matching another one mainly depends on what you do with it and your budget.,There's too much room for choice.,Sigma Xiaohei is not recommended.,Serious focusing,If you go to Canon70-200, if you don't think it's too heavy, go to XB or ISXB If you don't pursue the aperture, ISXXB is enough,XXB is not recommended,Telephoto on IShe stabilization is very important,It can greatly improve your film yield。
-
Anonymous users2024-02-14Oh, yes. Canon is 50d....
What is the purpose of the landlord buying a mirror? The characters are directly on the header Canon Genuine or Sigma's 50 which is also great.
Shooting landscapes It is recommended that the original Canon 17 40L is used in small format or standard bull heads, but you have 17-50, so it seems to be useless, hehe.
Telephoto birds, flowers, all good, Sigma 70-200, go pick one, or Xiaoxiaobai without anti-shake. Or the original 70-300 little green
Tamron's shot is good.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-13Landlord, Canon doesn't have a d50 Nikon's is a d50, Canon's should be 50d! What is the other lens of the landlord for, if you like to shoot flowers, birds, fish or something, Sigma's 70-200 is cost-effective, about 5k price, or there is original cleaning can buy 70-200 f4** is also more than 5k.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-12I've used 40d, and the current equipment in my hand is exactly 450d+17-50, if you simply talk about the effect, it's definitely 50d
First of all, the 50D is equipped with a relatively high practical ISO (ISO
Noise at 1600 is slightly less than at ISO 800 at 450D), secondly, for shooting dynamic portraits, especially for models with natural and fleeting expressions, the success rate is very high, and secondly, 50
In color and sharpness than 17-50
It should be slightly better, and the color is slightly reddish.
However, in most cases (unless you're shooting privately, one-on-one with the model), the 17-50 zoom is definitely easy to move, it is equivalent to the very common focal length of 27-80 on the 50d and 450d, and the constant aperture is not as good as the 50
But it's basically enough. And 17-50
The closest focusing distance is only, and you can get closer when shooting small objects.
Although it is not equipped with an ultrasonic motor, the focusing speed is still a cut faster than that of the 17-50.
So, if you plan to upgrade in the future, then the first 50D+50 is more suitable, if you rely on this configuration for a long time, then 450D+ is obviously more suitable for you, if the budget is sufficient, you can consider upgrading to the VC version (i.e. B005), with image stabilization, in the case of insufficient lighting, the success rate of shooting is higher (of course, if you shoot portraits indoors, it is recommended that you at least consider configuring a flash, whether it is domestic with TTL or the original factory).
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11The correct solution is:
Learning photography can give you the most significant improvement in image quality. Including how to shoot in the early stage, and how to deal with the software in the later stage**.
Comparatively speaking, the difference between the best and worst lenses is not one-tenth as much as the former.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10In addition, all prime lenses will have a significant improvement in image quality in this focal length, and there are 17-40mm f-4 (5100 yuan), 17-55 F yuan -35 F yuan and a little more than 35 F yuan in zoom lenses).
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09The equivalent focal length of the Canon SLR 650D with the Tamron 18-200 lens is about 29-320mm, and the 18-200mm is one of the lenses with the largest zoom ratio at present.
But this lens is not satisfactory in many aspects, such as large distortion at the corner of the wide slag Liang Town, low edge resolution, poor background blur effect, slow focusing speed, and average overall workmanship.
The reason for the existence of the 18-200 lens is that the focal length is practical, and it is useless to say that the good point is to go all over the world with one lens, and the bad point is useless.
If you want to be convenient and cheap, you can pay attention to the Canon 18-135mm STM, and the image quality is better than 18-200mm. This lens uses a new type of stepping motor, and the autofocus will not be noisy when shooting, and the focusing speed is very fast, and the focus is accurate when shooting movies. Also, there is a lens lock on the bottom of the lens to prevent the lens from automatically slipping out.
Pay attention to image quality and budget is not an issue, you can also pay attention to the EF-S 15-85mm, this lens is used on the 650D with an equivalent focal length of 24-136mm, the imaging effect has obvious advantages over the previous two lenses, and it is one of the best hanging heads for Canon C-format SLR cameras.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08In addition, jade hangers or something, it's best to get on a macro lens. And then with the effect of lighting.
Portrait of a person, recommended portrait king 50
Different needs and different lenses can give full play to the best film effect. If the requirements are not so high, the A16 is sufficient. Or, if you go to the A16 first, you think it's not enough to meet your needs, so you go on other shots.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-071.Choosing 17-50 is definitely better than the set head, 3 points, 1 is that the constant aperture of this lens is much larger than the set head; 2 is that the focal length of this head is exactly less than 3, and the internal distortion control is much better than that of the sleeve; 3 is that the image of this head is sharper than the head of the set, and the biggest indicator of shooting still life commodities is sharpness, how to look at a blur?
2.Choosing 17-50 can basically meet your shooting needs, but it is not the most suitable for this price point; When it comes to portraits, this lens is nothing special, and the depth of field for the longest 50mm is not particularly ideal, of course, this head is used everywhere to use more, the so-called compatible with more compatible functions are definitely not as good as specialization.
For things like jade, you need good lighting and lens imaging to show the details.
You can try Tamron's 90 micro, a lens that can take care of both portraits and macros, and shooting jewelry with a macro lens is the best choice.
The aperture of this lens is not small, it has a macro function, and you can see it by looking at the name, the prime head is better than the zoom lens in any way.
It's just that because of the fixed focus, it may be inconvenient to go out and play something, but this head out portrait is much better than 17-50.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-061.Right.
2.Jade pendant portraits require a proper shooting environment.
D90 + Tamron 17-50 is a cost-effective classic match.
I once had an old 17-50 with the D70S which was extremely sharp, and then there was obvious out-of-focus on the D90 and D300 bodies. I had to go out with the original D70S. >>>More
Next time, when you ask someone to introduce you to the lens, give you what you can bear**, otherwise you can't recommend it. The best way to shoot portraits is the fixed-focus large-aperture lens 135 2. 2 of them are red circles, and they are also more expensive, but Japanese photographic equipment is in line with the rule that "the more expensive, the better". >>>More
Look at your own needs first and then consider what lens to buy, otherwise it's just a matter of falling into the dust. If it's just a landscape or something, the sleeve is enough, if it's indoors, often encounter insufficient light, and the flash is not very ideal, it is recommended to buy 35, this lens can be stretched out indoors, 50 is too long, and the house is not big to lean against the wall. If you want to bokeh the effect when shooting portraits outdoors, you should buy the 85, this bokeh ability is much better than the 50, which is not long or short, but the application range of this medium and telephoto lens is relatively narrow. >>>More
50 is not a header on the 550 Suitable for portraits If you want to buy this lens, you don't need to think much about it It's cheaper than a filter It's actually okay how big the aperture is anyway, you have to receive more than 4 shots Besides, the aperture is a little closer, you can shoot people except for the tip of the nose and the face There is no place to focus 50 The key is the difference in imaging, not the bokeh effect Don't believe in any low-light shooting 80mm shutter is generally 1 80 1 100 This head is light 1 60 can generally be received and the aperture 4 receives 8 It is not a step behind If you want to shoot low light well, you have to use a tripod flash If it's just this one lens, it's a bit limited: 50 and a 50 macro that head is also very good There are 28 and 35 prime for the 550 as a header.
As a mid-range product of Canon, 50D was released in 2008, and compared with the previous 40D, it mainly has millions more pixels and the maximum size has been increased. In addition, the more practical LCD display has been increased to 920,000 pixels, and the effect of retrospective is much better. Although it has been discontinued, there are still stocks on the market for sale, **5800 or so. >>>More